Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

The Integral Concepts article series

This article series explores essential concepts and methods for deploying Statistical Process Control (SPC) and Design of Experiments (DOE) effectively in your production operation.  The articles focus on essential concepts as well as important topics that often not covered in basic SPC or DOE training programs.  Some related statistical methods are also covered in a few of the articles

by Steven Wachs 3 Comments

What is a CUSUM Chart and When Should I Use One?

What is a CUSUM Chart and When Should I Use One?

Introduction

In previous articles, we discussed the advantages that Xbar charts have over Individuals charts in detecting process shifts.  (See “How Should the Subgroup Size be Selected for an Xbar Chart (Part I)”)  We saw that charts of Individuals are ineffective at quickly detecting small process shifts (and detecting these small process changes may be critical!).

Charts of averages (Xbar) are superior because averaging the subgroup data gives us greater certainty as to where the process is actually running at a point in time.  Selecting an appropriate sample size on an Xbar chart allows us to align the statistical performance of the control chart with the desired practical process changes we’d like to detect.  That is, the sensitivity (ability to detect change) may be adjusted based on the sample size utilized.   [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

by Steven Wachs 2 Comments

Analyzing the Experiment (Part 2) – Determining Significant Effects

Analyzing the Experiment (Part 2) – Determining Significant Effects

In the last article, we learned how to compute and graphically interpret both main effects and interaction effects.  Eventually, the statistically significant effects will be used to develop a predictive model.  But how do we determine which effects are statistically significant?

Conceptually, we first develop an “error” distribution that represents the distribution of Insignificant Effects.  If we have an idea of what the Insignificant Effects look like, we can determine which of the effects we compute look significant by comparison.   [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

Pre-Control: No Substitute for Statistical Process Control

Pre-Control:  No Substitute for Statistical Process Control

Statistical Process Control (SPC) charts allow timely detection of assignable causes of process changes (e.g. shifts, trends, variation) so that root causes may be determined and corrective actions taken before product performance is adversely impacted.  Proper use of SPC identifies and eliminates “special cause” sources of variation.  To achieve desired process capability, sources of “common cause” variation may need to be identified as well, using tools such as Design of Experiments to develop process understanding and predictive models that explain the source of the unwanted variability.   [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

Analyzing the Experiment (Part I) – Main & Interaction Effects

Analyzing the Experiment (Part I) – Main & Interaction Effects

We are ready to learn how to analyze the data collected during the experiment.  This is the most exciting part of DOE!  We will cover the analysis in this article as well as the next several articles.

The following are the main steps to perform during the analysis:

  • Calculate the Main Effects and Interaction Effects
  • Test the Effects for Statistical Significance
  • Interpret the Significant Effects (Often with Plots)
  • Develop Predictive Model(s)
  • Perform Model Validation (Residual Analysis)
  • Find Solutions and Perform Optimization to find Best Solution(s)
  • Validate the Solutions
  • Determine if Follow-up Experimentation is Necessary

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

How can an OC Curve be Used to Manage the Risk of Undetected Special Causes?

How can an OC Curve be Used to Manage the Risk of Undetected Special Causes?

When applied properly, SPC provides manufacturers a proven method to increase profitability and achieve a deeper understanding of their processes..  Additionally, SPC can prevent problems—saving companies money that would have been lost in scrap, rework, warranty, litigation, and market share decline.  A key factor in obtaining these SPC benefits is the proper deployment of control charts.  Correctly designed control charts identify significant changes to a process.  These can be changes that are still within specification, but are statistically different than where the process was previously running.  By identifying the changes, personnel can determine what caused the change and potentially improve the process or prevent the production of inferior products.   [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

Conducting the Experiment

Conducting the Experiment

In this week’s article entry, we discuss some guidelines for conducting an experiment.  As we discussed in an earlier post, planning the study is critical for a successful outcome.  A good plan makes the conduct of the study straightforward.

Below are some key aspects of conducting the study: [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

Important DOE Techniques

Important DOE Techniques

In this article post, we discuss several important techniques to consider when conducting and analyzing an experiment.  They are summarized in the table below and next we discuss each one in a bit more detail.  Some of these techniques are bit more advanced (e.g. Blocking, Covariates), but they are introduced here.    [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

How Should the Sample Size be Selected for an X-bar Chart? (Part II)

How Should the Sample Size be Selected for an X-bar Chart? (Part II)

An earlier article focused on the conceptual application of appropriate sample sizes for X-bar charts.  As we discussed, the purpose of control charts is to detect significant process changes when they occur.  When the proper sample size is selected, X-bar charts will detect process shifts (that have practical significance) in a timely manner. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

Planning for a DOE

Planning for a DOE

In this article post, we discuss the suggested steps for planning a Designed Experiment.

Step #1 – Clearly Define the Problem and Objectives

It is critical to clearly define the problem before beginning experimentation.  When the problem is not clearly defined and described, there will be confusion in designing and executing effective studies.  To define appropriate responses to measure requires that the problem be understood and agreed on.  Also, it is key to define the objectives of the actual experiment.  If the problem is to reduce scrap rate, how much of a reduction is targeted? [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

How Should the Sample Size be Selected for an X-bar Chart? (Part I)

How Should the Sample Size be Selected for an X-bar Chart? (Part I)

The purpose of control charts is to detect significant process changes when they occur.  In general, charts that display averages of data/measurements (X-bar charts) are more useful than charts of individual data points or measurements.  Charts of individuals are not nearly as sensitive as charts of averages at detecting process changes quickly.  X-bar charts are far superior at detecting process shifts in a timely manner, and the sample size is a crucial element in ensuring that appropriate chart signals are produced. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

How do I know what product or process characteristics to control?

How do I know what product or process characteristics to control?

While the construction of control charts is relatively straight-forward, often a more difficult question is “how do I know what process characteristic to control in the first place?”  Clearly, controlling “everything” is not feasible or a smart use of limited resources.   [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

Basic DOE Terminology

Basic DOE Terminology

In this article post, we formally define or describe the basic terminology that is commonly used in Design of Experiments.  Some of the terms we have already been using in prior posts, but they will also be presented here for completeness.  This is Part I of a two part article covering DOE Terminology.  [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

How is Formal Experimentation different from Simplistic Approaches? (Part II)

How is Formal Experimentation different from Simplistic Approaches? (Part II)

Statistically based DOE provides several advantages over more simplistic approaches such “one-factor-at-a-time” experimentation.  These advantages include:

  • The use of statistical methodology to determine which factors are actually (statistically) significant
  • Balanced experimental designs to allow stronger conclusions with respect to cause and effect relationships (as opposed to just finding correlations)
  • The ability to understand and estimate interactions between factors
  • The development of predictive models that are used to find optimal solutions for one or more responses

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

How do I Choose the Appropriate Type of Control Chart?

How do I Choose the Appropriate Type of Control Chart?

Proper control chart selection is critical to realizing the benefits of Statistical Process Control.  Many factors should be considered when choosing a control chart for a given application.  These include:

  • The type of data being charted (continuous or attribute)
  • The required sensitivity (size of the change to be detected) of the chart
  • Whether the chart includes data from multiple locations or not
  • The ease and cost of sampling
  • Production volumes

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

How is Formal Experimentation different from Simplistic Approaches (Part I)

How is Formal Experimentation different from Simplistic Approaches (Part I)

Statistically based DOE provides several advantages over more simplistic approaches such “one-factor-at-a-time” experimentation.  These advantages include:

  • The use of statistical methodology to determine which factors are actually (statistically) significant
  • Balanced experimental designs to allow stronger conclusions with respect to cause and effect relationships (as opposed to just finding correlations)
  • The ability to understand and estimate interactions between factors
  • The development of predictive models that are used to find optimal solutions for one or more responses

This article will explore the first two advantages in a bit more detail.  The second two advantages will be discussed in the next article post.  [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

« Previous Page
Next Page »
Articles by Steven Wachs, Integral Concepts
in the Integral Concepts article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • So, What’s Still Wrong with Maintenance
  • Foundation of Great Project Outcomes – Structures
  • What is the Difference Between Quality Assurance and Quality Control?
  • Covariance of the Kaplan-Meier Estimators?
  • Use Of RFID In Process Safety: Track Hazardous Chemicals And Track Personnel

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.