Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Doug Lehr Leave a Comment

The Plug and Perf Process

The Plug and Perf Process

Multi-stage horizontal wells have been drilled and completed in shale formations in North America for two decades, and now account for nearly 90% of new wells drilled in the U.S. The Plug and Perf process (PnP) is used for completing most of these wells.

Simplified Plug and Perf Schematic

The PnP process inputs are electric line, perforating systems, ballistic setting tools, frac plug with ball, and pressure pumping (frac pumps). The process is to run the perforating guns, setting tool, and frac plug in one trip on electric line into the well. In the horizontal section (“the lateral”), frac pumps assist by “pumping” the tools to the target location. Flow rates are typically 10 barrels per minute (BPM), or 420 GPM. Run-in speeds can reach 400 fpm, or 4 ½ mph. At the target location, pumping stops, and the ballistic setting tool is actuated which sets and releases from the frac plug. The perforating guns are then moved up-hole a short distance and the first of multiple clusters of perforating charges are fired, creating perforation tunnels which connect the casing to the adjacent shale rock. The perforating gun, setting tool, and electric line are then removed from the well. After removal, the ball is pumped with the fracturing fluids to the frac plug. When the ball seats on the frac plug, those fluids are diverted at high rates and pressures into the perforations to fracture the shale, creating pathways for oil or gas to flow to the well.

The PnP process is executed dozens of times in one well with expectations for the highest mechanical reliability. But in many well completions the frac plug, setting tool, frac ball, and power charge are provided by different OEMs. For example, in a 5 ½” 20 ppf casing application, a service company could run a frac plug sourced from one of twelve OEMs, with a frac ball sourced from at least four sources, on a running tool purchased or rented from at least five other OEMs, using a power charge sourced from either of two other OEMs. This means that 480 unique combinations of frac plug, frac ball, setting tool, and power charge are possible for this application. Can a frac plug OEM vet every possible combination for system reliability? No. But each frac plug OEM must establish compatibility and system reliability through the laboratory testing of their frac plugs with preferred setting tools, power charges, and frac balls, and develop recommended combinations.

TRUTH: The system reliability of PnP tools must be established prior to installation.

This is the 1st in a series of five articles on why Frac Plugs fail in Plug and Perf applications.

  1. The Plug and Perf Process
  2. Frac Plug Reliability
  3. Ballistic Setting Tools
  4. The Pump-In Process
  5. Well Tortuosity

Filed Under: Articles, Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications, on Risk & Safety

« Is Making Assumptions Similar to Making Mistakes
Human Factors in Design Error? »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Doug Lehr, P.E., Founder and Principal, Integris Technology
in the Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Risk Prioritization in FMEA – a Summary
  • What Are Best Practices for Facilitating Qualitative Assessments?
  • So, What’s Still Wrong with Maintenance
  • Foundation of Great Project Outcomes – Structures
  • What is the Difference Between Quality Assurance and Quality Control?

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.