Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • CMMSradio
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Asset Performance
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Hero
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Breaking Bad for Reliability
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • The RCA
      • Communicating with FINESSE
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Hardware Product Develoment Lifecycle
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Special Offers
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
      • FMEA Introduction
      • AIAG & VDA FMEA Methodology
    • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction
      • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Home » Archives for Kerina Epperly

Kerina Epperly — New Contributor

Kerina is the author of the article series The Reliability Crime Lab. The author's archive lists contributions to articles and episodes.

About Kerina Epperly

Kerina Epperly is a Failure Forensic Specialist, RCM2, TPM transformation leader, and the creator of FRAME-D an advanced diagnostic command center that makes reliability visual, simple, and teachable. With over 25 years of cross-industry experience, she brings a practical, investigative approach to solving equipment failures and elevating maintenance culture.

by Kerina Epperly Leave a Comment

The Curious Case of “Normal” Bearing Failure

The Curious Case of “Normal” Bearing Failure

When Poor Habits Become the Norm

Opening Scene

Imagine an intricate and lengthy production line, where every minute of inactivity costs thousands of dollars. The constant buzz of motors and conveyors conceals a profound tension: production goals are approaching, supervisors are vigilant, and the pressure remains unyielding. 

In a constrained environment with a limited maintenance budget and sparse spare parts, your inexperienced and stretched-thin team constantly reacts to urgent breakdowns, prioritizing speed over thoroughness. Shortcuts become necessary for survival, leading to misaligned work and temporary fixes. While immediate repairs may succeed, small defects accumulate, resulting in entrenched bad habits and hidden failures. Eventually, a critical breakdown occurs, revealing the underlying issues, marking the start of a necessary investigation. 

Understanding Failure

Every failure has a signature; Bearings show internal and external evidence. Internal evidence includes scoring, pitting, or spalling on the raceways and rollers, which tell a story of stress and neglect. Externally, you might notice abnormal vibration or noise, subtle whispers of distress that often go unheard in the cacophony of the production line.

Every failure has a signature; Bearings show internal and external evidence. Internal evidence includes scoring, pitting, or spalling on the raceways and rollers, which tell a story of stress and neglect. Externally, you might notice abnormal vibration or noise, subtle whispers of distress that often go unheard in the cacophony of the production line. 

Crime Scene  

In our investigation, we examine these signatures like detectives at a crime scene, piecing together the narrative of wear and tear. Each scratch and scar is a clue, a chapter in the machine’s life that speaks volumes about its treatment and care or lack thereof. 

During our investigation, we observed that the machine is not secured to the ground (unbolted). There is a slight micro-movement occurring as the production is being conveyed. The bearing exhibits typical signs of creep, including discoloration around the seal and bearing interface, as well as the presence of sludge.

Component: Deep Groove Ball Bearing 

Industry: General Manufacturing 

Observed Condition: Pitting, uneven wear, outer race scoring, discoloration, sludge. 

Machine Mounting: Free-floating, unbolted

The Failure Modes (Aggressive Agents)

  • Micro-vibrations: Unbolted machine 
  • Misalignment: Eyeballed installation 
  • Impact Loading: Machine movement during startup/shutdown 
  • Raceway Fretting: Accelerated by looseness 
  • Lubrication Stress: Micro-movement and heat 
  • Poor Sanitation Practices: Water ingress, aggressive chemicals, debris 

Individually, these symptoms seem minor. Together, the produce cumulative, compounding damage, until the machine crosses the P-F curve and operators are left in shock when it “failed without warning.” 

The Fingerprints (Clues of the Crime)

  • Bearing has polished wear marks on the raceway. 
  • Pitted surfaces showing repeated micro-movement.
  • Reddish discoloration – early fretting.
  • Uneven wear indicating dynamic misalignment
  • Cage marks showing load fluctuations.

Degrades
until
failure

Interview

During our discussions with the operators and technicians in the area, we discovered that the bearings here have a persistent history of early failure. The average meantime to failure is approximately three to six months. One technician mentioned that they lack the tools necessary to measure alignment during installation, as they are responsible for purchasing their own equipment. Consequently, they rely on visual estimation. This reliance on guesswork has unfortunately become the norm, leading to a cycle of repeated mistakes and costly downtime. The operators expressed frustration, not only with the lack of proper tools but also with the insufficient training on how to recognize early warning signs of machine distress. 

One veteran technician lamented, “We’re set up to fail before we even start.” This sentiment underscores the critical need for systemic change.  

Technician’s Statements

“We’re run machines unbolted for years.”

“I’ve seen worse and they still ran fine.”

This is classic EXPERIENCE BIAS.  

When ineffective practices do not lead to instant failure, they often become justified, normalized, and ultimately defended. The issue? Machine health does not COMPROMISE with our BIASES.

The Culprit (Who Did It):

  • Lack of proper anchoring: Foundation instability 
  • Poor Installation practices: Misalignment
  • Absence of torque specification: Improper preload
  • Preventative maintenance gap: No vibration trending
  • Cultural acceptance of deviations: Normalized defects 

Forensic Assessment

The inquiry extends beyond merely identifying what went awry; it delves into why it was permitted to occur. 

  • Did the pressure to achieve targets prompt a quick fix instead of a thorough repair? 
  • Was there insufficient training that left team members oblivious to the subtle indicators of looming failure? 
  • Is there an over-reliance on technicians to acquire and maintain their own equipment? 
  • Or was it merely the normalization of shortcuts that became the accepted practice? 

The Real Culprit: Normalization of Deviance 

This case isn’t about bearing failure. It’s about the mindset. When organizations accept:  “We’ve always doesn’t it this way.”  “It’s still running, so it’s fine.” “We don’t need precision for this machine.”  They inadvertently allow defects to mature into failures. The enemy is not ignorant, its complacency cloaked as experience.  

The Fix is Simple

  • Bolt and anchor assemblies per OEM
  • Laser alignment, not eyeballing
  • Torque tools with documented values
  • Condition monitoring baseline
  • Technician training that closes experience gaps
  • Program to improve sanitation practices 

By investing in the right tools and thorough training, the team can transition from a reactive firefighting approach to a proactive maintenance strategy. This change not only enhances machine reliability but also elevates team morale, as members develop confidence and competence in their responsibilities. 

As we move forward, it is crucial to cultivate an environment that prioritizes open communication and continuous learning. By addressing these foundational aspects, the production line can transform into a model of efficiency and resilience, where every team member feels appreciated and empowered to thrive. 

Grasping these subtleties is essential. It goes beyond merely repairing machines; it involves shifting mindsets, breaking free from complacency, and nurturing a culture of proactive maintenance. In doing so, we not only prevent future breakdowns but also inspire the team to take pride in their work, ensuring the line operates smoothly day in and day out. 

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, The Reliability Crime Lab

Get Weekly Email Updates
The Accendo Reliablity logo of a sun face in circuit

Please login to have full access.




Lost Password? Click here to have it emailed to you.

Not already a member? It's free and takes only a moment to create an account with your email only.

Join

Your membership brings you all these free resources:

  • Live, monthly reliability webinars & recordings
  • eBooks: Finding Value and Reliability Maturity
  • How To articles & insights
  • Podcasts & additional information within podcast show notes
  • Podcast suggestion box to send us a question or topic for a future episode
  • Course (some with a fee)
  • Largest reliability events calendar
  • Course on a range of topics - coming soon
  • Master reliability classes - coming soon
  • Basic tutorial articles - coming soon
  • With more in the works just for members

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

Book the Course with John
  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.
This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.