Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • CMMSradio
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Asset Performance
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Hero
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Breaking Bad for Reliability
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • The RCA
      • Communicating with FINESSE
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Hardware Product Develoment Lifecycle
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
      • FMEA Introduction
      • AIAG & VDA FMEA Methodology
    • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction
      • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Home » Articles » on Tools & Techniques » Institute of Quality & Reliability » B10 Life for Weibull and Lognormal Distributions

by Hemant Urdhwareshe Leave a Comment

B10 Life for Weibull and Lognormal Distributions

B10 Life for Weibull and Lognormal Distributions

Dear friends, we are happy to upload this video on how to estimate B10 life when failure data follows Weibull or Lognormal Distribution. Your feedback on the video is welcome!

This video from the Institute of Quality and Reliability explains how to determine BX life for products that follow Weibull and log-normal distributions. BX life is defined as the time by which X percent of items are expected to fail. For example, B10 life means that 10% of items are expected to fail, which implies a 90% reliability.

We recommend watching following videos before watching this video for better learning experience:

Weibull Distribution Part-1

B10 Life for Exponential Distribution

Normal Distribution and Z-Score

Lognormal Distribution

Weibull Distribution

The Weibull distribution is used when the failure rate (λ) varies with time. Its reliability function is given by:

$$ R\left(T\right)=e^{-\left(\frac{T}{\eta}\right)^{\beta}} $$

Where:

  • T is time.
  • η (eta) is the characteristic life or scale parameter.
  • β (beta) is the shape parameter.

To calculate B10 life (where R(T)=0.9):

  1. Start with the reliability function:
$$ 0.9=e^{-\left(\frac{T}{\eta}\right)^{\beta}} $$
  1. Take the natural logarithm of both sides: ln(0.9)=−(T/η)β
$$ \ln(0.9)=-{\left(\frac{T}{\eta}\right)^{\beta}} $$
  1. Solve for T: T=η⋅(−ln(0.9))1/β
$$ T=\eta\centerdot\left(-\ln\left(0.9\right)\right)^{\frac{1}{\beta}} $$

Example: An oil seal with a characteristic life (η) of 6,000 hours and a shape parameter (β) of 2.5 has a B10 life calculated as approximately 2,439 hours.


Log-Normal Distribution

The log-normal distribution is often used for failures caused by fatigue or wear-out. To determine BX life for this distribution, the failure times are transformed into their natural logarithms, which then follow a normal distribution.

The calculation uses the Z-score formula:

Z=(x−μ)/σ

Where:

  • x is the natural logarithm of the time (ln(T)) you want to find.
  • μ (mu) is the log mean of the distribution.
  • σ (sigma) is the log standard deviation of the distribution.

For B10 life, you need the Z-score corresponding to a cumulative failure probability of 0.10 (10%). From a standard normal distribution table, this Z-score is approximately -1.28.

Example: Refrigerator door handles experience fatigue failures following a log-normal distribution with a log mean (μ) of 11 and a log standard deviation (σ) of 0.7. The doors open 40 times per day.

  1. Using the Z-score for B10 life (-1.28): −1.28=(ln(T)−11) / 0.7
  2. Solve for ln(T): ln(T)=−1.28×0.7+11=10.104
  3. Solve for T (Cycles): T=e10.104≈24,440 cycles.
  4. Convert cycles to days (40 cycles/day): 24,440 cycles/40 cycles/day=611 days.

This indicates that 10% of the door handles are expected to fail by 611 days, suggesting a potential need for design improvement.

Filed Under: Articles, Institute of Quality & Reliability, on Tools & Techniques

About Hemant Urdhwareshe

He is the first Six Sigma Master Black Belt in India certified by American Society for Quality (ASQ) and is one of the most qualified, knowledgeable and experienced quality professionals in India.

« 3: Concept & Feasibility Phase – Part 2: Feasibility
Is Your Greatest Reliability Asset Underutilized? »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Institute for Quality & Reliability logo Photo of Hemant UrdhwaresheArticles by Hemant Urdhwareshe

in the Institute for Quality & Reliability article series

Recent Posts

  • The Rivian Paradox
  • You Don’t Need (More) Reliability Engineers
  • Listening with Intent: The Missing Skill in Design Thinking
  • 10 Reasons to Avoid MTBF
  • MTBF, who are you?

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

Book the Course with John
  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.
This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.