Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • CMMSradio
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Asset Performance
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Hero
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • The RCA
      • Communicating with FINESSE
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Hardware Product Develoment Lifecycle
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
      • FMEA Introduction
      • AIAG & VDA FMEA Methodology
    • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction
      • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Home » Articles » NoMTBF » How to Judge a Reliability Book

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

How to Judge a Reliability Book

How to Judge a Reliability Book

By it’s cover no doubt. The title and cover are important, this is true. When you judge a reliability book we often first see and evaluate the cover.

The author? Do you buy the book based on who wrote or edited it?

Do you have a quick scan or check for key features before you add the book to your library? I’m curious how you select a book to use a reference for your work. The books we read and use for work shape our work, thus it’s important to have the right works at our disposal.

Different Kinds of Reliability Books

We use professional books for different purposes thus that may change how you judge the book.

  • Reference books such as dictionaries or glossaries are for quick checks or research.
  • Text books provide explanations, develop concepts, provide examples, and include end of chapter problem sets.
  • Business story book are part fictional novel and part concept development. These may include explanation of processes, success stories, overcoming obstacles, and procedures.
  • How to books show us step by step how to accomplish something. 10 steps to perform FMEA, 5 step planning for an ALT, etc.
  • Edited collections are books written by various authors. Often each chapter is by a different author. The editor organizes the chapters and works to provide some continuity between chapters.

Of course some books mix the above elements. For example a text book may include how to elements. In part the way we judge a book is by how we expect to use the book. If we’re taking a class then reference and text books may be particularly helpful. If trying to brush up on sample size determination (just need the formula) then a how to or text book may have what we need.

How I Judge a Reliability Book

Here’s what I do when I discover a reliability book. I have hundreds of books in my library so have enjoyed judging plenty of books over the years. Also, I suppose my criteria is aimed more at understanding what the book is about rather than to inform a purchase decision.

First, I scan the table of contents. How is the book organized? Does it have topics of interest?

Is the book slanted one way or another concerning treatment of the topic.  For example, some are more a statistics book that has reliability topics, while others are a reliability engineering book that happens to include statistics. Is the book theoretical or practical?

Second, skim the first few pages (the forward or first chapter). This often is where an author explicitly describes what the book is about and who it for. They may layout the purpose and organization of the book as well.

Third, flip through the book. Get a sense of the layout. Masses of dense mathematical derivations or complex charts and graphs or blocks of dense text.

Fourth, scan the appendices and index. A text book and some others will include pure gold in the appendix section. The index is a quick way to determine the range of topics, plus a sense of how you quickly you could find something in particular.

Finally, how does the author talk about reliability? Do they use the definition that includes function, environment, duration and probability? Do they use MTBF? As you suspect, the work diminishes in value if they use MTBF instead of the reliability function. If they use MTBF is it describe a concept then quickly move on to a useful discussion while not using MTBF?

If a book uses MTBF I don’t use the book for work. Such books are not helpful for the practical world of reliability engineering.

How Do you Judge the Reliability Books You Run Across

What do you look for in a book? What would you add to my list of checks of a book?

Leave a comment with your thoughts.

Filed Under: Articles, NoMTBF

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Deciding When to Do a Reliability Failure Study
Why Weibull is so popular? »

Comments

  1. Dave Robson says

    June 21, 2017 at 9:52 AM

    I’ve been very lucky with the books I’ve bought over the years, based on Table of Contents (buying online).

    Many ‘reliability’ books provide you with the basics of reliability and go no further. If you’re looking for some really meaty reliability, a bit of research is required. I was reading a paper which quoted a Bayesian book, (I looked for over a year for a good Bayesian Reliability before buying one from Springer Yellow Books.

    Reply
    • Fred says

      June 21, 2017 at 10:11 AM

      Yes, to find the really good book does take a bit more work.

      What is the Bayesian book you found? Would you recommend it? Maybe write a review that we could post here on NoMTBF.

      Cheers,

      Fred

      Reply
      • Greg Watson says

        June 26, 2017 at 11:15 PM

        My approach is similar although I look to understand ideas behind managing for reliability and not just the analytical or testing sides. What are the requirements set for reliability – test to failure to really understand what are the risks or is it just a Delphi-like approach with people guessing in a classroom? That is as bad as using MTBF as a decision aid!

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The NoMTBF logo

Devoted to the eradication of the misuse of MTBF.

Photo of Fred SchenkelbergArticles by Fred Schenkelberg and guest authors

in the NoMTBF article series

Recent Posts

  • Quality Objective 7: HIGH-RISK FAILURES IDENTIFIED
  • Robust Design Introduction
  • KPIs and Maintenance Planning
  • 7 Proven Strategies to Protect Your Supply Chain
  • Progress in USAF Engine Logistics?

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

Book the Course with John
  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.
This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.