Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site
Striving to be best in class is perhaps the ultimate goal of every organization. But what exactly does it take to get there? In the first part of this podcast, we talked about the changes seen in maintenance, reliability, and failure analysis over the years and what makes these practices successful in best in class organizations.
ᐅ Play Episode
The leap towards becoming a best-in-class company is challenging. If you’re like most people, you might have wondered the difference between best in class companies and typical companies as far as reliability practices are concerned. While it’s true that there are other elements that are at play that make for a best-in-class company, one can’t deny that maintenance and reliability is one differentiating factor and a critical element at that.
ᐅ Play Episode
The organizations often tend to ignore some simple things when they are mitigating a machinery failure. Some of the important things being; why did the failure occur? Who should be asked about it? What kind of measures can be taken so that it doesn’t occur again? Most of the time, it is just changing parts without doing the proper analysis or troubleshooting for that matter. What you should be doing as a professional organization is, train your technicians about step by step problem solving by giving them test examples. The technicians should be able to contribute to the solutions and they should be encouraged to do so.
In this episode, we covered:
Ask a question or send along a comment.
Please login to view and use the contact form.
In a previous episode with our guest speaker Heinz Bloch, we covered how certain organizations were able to achieve best-in-class reliability programs. In this podcast episode, we’ll dig into what makes for a world-class lubrication program. Truth be told, only a very few organizations achieved and are implementing world-class lubrication programs. Obviously, there are certain best practices that they do that others don’t.
ᐅ Play Episode
Reliability and test planning takes time and it’s easy to use the plan worked out for the last program.
Yet this doesn’t consider the new risks or technology or use conditions that impact product reliability.
If you find resistance as you propose improvements to the reliability plan or to the test plan, what can you do to gain acceptance?
If the source of resistance that what we did last time worked, why change, then what steps can you take to secure support for the needed changes?
ᐅ Play Episode