Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • CMMSradio
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Asset Performance
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Gang
    • Reliability Hero
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
      • Reliability Bites
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Crime Lab
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Beyond the Numbers
      • Breaking Bad for Reliability
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • The RCA
      • Communicating with FINESSE
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Hardware Product Develoment Lifecycle
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Special Offers
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
      • FMEA Introduction
      • AIAG & VDA FMEA Methodology
    • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction
      • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Home » Articles » on Tools & Techniques » The Manufacturing Academy » Defining TEEP, OOE, and OEE

by Ray Harkins Leave a Comment

Defining TEEP, OOE, and OEE

Defining TEEP, OOE, and OEE

This article is adapted from Chapter 3 of my book titled Measuring Manufacturing Effectiveness.

The book is organized as a structured, multi-chapter exploration of how manufacturing organizations define, measure, and interpret “effectiveness.” Rather than focusing on isolated metrics or tools, it examines measurement as a system; one that shapes decisions, priorities, and behavior across operations, quality, reliability, and management.

Each chapter is written to stand on its own, while also contributing to a larger, integrated framework for understanding manufacturing performance.

Chapter 3 focuses on three of the most commonly used, and most frequently misunderstood, manufacturing effectiveness metrics:

  • Total Effective Equipment Performance (TEEP)
  • Overall Operations Effectiveness (OOE)
  • Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)

Although these measures are often treated as variations of the same idea, they differ in important and meaningful ways. This chapter clarifies what each metric is designed to measure, the assumptions embedded in each definition, and the types of questions each metric is and is not capable of answering.

Chapter 3: Defining TEEP, OOE, and OEE

This chapter formally defines Total Effective Equipment Performance (TEEP), Overall Operations Effectiveness (OOE), and Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE).

These effectiveness metrics differ only in scope. They are applied to the same production system and share a common structure.

Generalized Formula

All three metrics express the ratio of usable output time to a defined time base.

$$ \displaystyle \text{Effectiveness}=\frac{\text{Good Ouput Time}}{\text{Reference Time}} $$

The numerator remains constant. The denominator defines the scope of the metric.

Total Effective Equipment Performance (TEEP)

TEEP measures how effectively calendar time is converted into usable output.

$$ \displaystyle \text{TEEP}=\frac{\text{Good Output Time}}{\text{Calendar Time}} $$

Calendar time includes all time within the reference period, regardless of staffing, scheduling, or production intent.

TEEP reflects utilization decisions as well as system behavior. It is sensitive to staffing models, shift patterns, and production strategy.

Overall Operations Effectiveness (OOE)

OOE measures how effectively operating time is converted into usable output.

$$ \displaystyle \text{OOE}=\frac{\text{Good Output Time}}{\text{Operating Time}} $$

Operating time includes time during which the system is staffed and intended for production activity. It excludes non-operating calendar time (typically holidays, weekends, etc.) but includes both planned and unplanned losses.

Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)

OEE measures how effectively scheduled production time is converted into usable output.

$$ \displaystyle \text{OEE}=\frac{\text{Good Output Time}}{\text{Scheduled Production Time}} $$

Scheduled production time excludes planned downtime but includes unplanned downtime. Planned downtime includes preventive maintenance activities, training and team meetings, and changeovers.  

OEE therefore incorporates availability, performance, and quality losses within a single measure of effectiveness.

Relationship Between Metrics

TEEP, OOE, and OEE are related as follows:

$$ \displaystyle \text{TEEP}\leq\text{OOE}\leq\text{OEE} $$

The inequality reflects scope, not performance. A lower value does not imply inferior operation.

Decomposition of OEE

OEE is commonly decomposed into three multiplicative components:

$$ \displaystyle \text{OEE}=\text{Availability}\times\text{Performance}\times\text{Quality} $$

Where:

$$ \displaystyle \text{Availability}=\frac{\text{Available Production Time}}{\text{Scheduled Production Time}} $$ $$ \displaystyle \text{Performance}=\frac{\text{Effective Production Time}}{\text{Available Production Time}} $$ $$ \displaystyle \text{Quality}=\frac{\text{Good Output Time}}{\text{Effective Production Time}} $$

Each component isolates a distinct loss mechanism.

Time Definitions

For consistency, the following time terms are used throughout this book:

  • Calendar Time: Total time in the reference period
  • Operating Time: Time during which production is intended
  • Scheduled Production Time: Operating time minus planned downtime
  • Available Production Time: Scheduled production time minus unplanned downtime
  • Effective Production Time: Available production time minus performance loss
  • Good Output Time: Effective production time minus quality loss

These definitions are applied consistently in all examples and calculations.

Figure 2 depicts a conceptual interaction between time, the production process, losses, and good output.

Figure 2: An illustration of how TEEP, OOE, and OEE represent different views of the same production system with its various
outputs and losses.

Scope and Neutrality

This chapter defines metrics. No guidance is offered here regarding target values, acceptable ranges, or comparative performance. Interpretation depends on context and is addressed in subsequent chapters.

Key Takeaways

  • TEEP, OOE, and OEE share a common structure.
  • The denominator defines metric scope.
  • The numerator represents usable output.
  • OEE decomposes into availability, performance, and quality.
  • Metrics differ by scope, not intent.

Formal definitions provide precision and consistency. Meaning emerges through interpretation.

This chapter is one part of a 12-chapter framework presented in Measuring Manufacturing Effectiveness, which examines how manufacturing measurement systems influence operational outcomes, decision-making, and organizational behavior. If you purchase Measuring Manufacturing Effectiveness through this link, it helps support the ongoing work of Accendo Reliability, which has generously hosted this serialized release.

Ray Harkins is the General Manager of Lexington Technologies in Lexington, North Carolina. He earned his Master of Science from Rochester Institute of Technology and his Master of Business Administration from Youngstown State University. He also teaches 60+ quality, engineering, manufacturing, and business-related courses such as Quality Engineering Statistics, Reliability Engineering Statistics, Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA), and Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process through the online learning platform, Udemy.

Book cover for Measuring Manufacturing Effectivenss by Ray Harkins

Measuring Manufacturing Effectiveness

Understanding Time, Loss, and Output Using the OEE, OOE, and TEEP Metrics

by Ray Harkins

The book consolidates the complete framework into a single coherent model rather than isolated articles. If you’d like access to the full structured framework, including all chapters, diagrams, models, equations, and supporting examples, the complete book is available in hardcover and Kindle ebook.

Measuring Manufacturing Effectiveness is a concise technical handbook for manufacturing professionals who want to use data and metrics to understand what is really happening on the shop floor.

Most discussions of OEE reduce performance to “running too slow” and treat downtime as a single bucket. Those approaches produce scorekeeping, not insight. This book takes a different route: it shows how manufacturing time is progressively converted into usable output, and how common effectiveness metrics make losses visible when they are interpreted correctly.

Filed Under: Articles, on Tools & Techniques, The Manufacturing Academy

About Ray Harkins

Ray Harkins is a senior manufacturing professional with over 25 years of experience in manufacturing engineering, quality management, and business analysis.

During his career, he has toured hundreds of manufacturing facilities and worked with leading industry professionals throughout North America and Japan.

« What Makes the Best Reliability Engineer?
Boeing 737 MAX: A Reliability Perspective »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Logo for The Manufacturing Acadamey headshot of RayArticle by Ray Harkins
in the The Manufacturing Academy article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Boeing 737 MAX: A Reliability Perspective
  • Defining TEEP, OOE, and OEE
  • What Makes the Best Reliability Engineer?
  • An Accuracy Controlled SOP Protects Against Human Error
  • Agile 2 and Agility (Part 1)

© 2026 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

Book the Course with John
  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.
This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.