Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • CMMSradio
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Asset Performance
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Hero
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Breaking Bad for Reliability
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • The RCA
      • Communicating with FINESSE
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Hardware Product Develoment Lifecycle
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Special Offers
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
      • FMEA Introduction
      • AIAG & VDA FMEA Methodology
    • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction
      • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Home » Articles » on Product Reliability » Reliability Knowledge » Design Change Implementation

by Semion Gengrinovich Leave a Comment

Design Change Implementation

Design Change Implementation

After conducting a thorough root cause analysis and identifying the underlying issues behind a problem, the next critical step is developing and implementing effective solutions. However, this process requires careful planning and consideration of various factors to ensure the solution addresses the root cause and can be successfully deployed. This article explores key considerations when implementing solutions, particularly for products already in the field.

Control Dependency vs. Hardware Changes.

One of the first considerations is whether the solution involves control dependency changes or hardware modifications. Control dependency refers to changes in the logical flow or decision-making processes within the system, often implemented through software updates. On the other hand, hardware changes involve physical modifications to the product’s components.

Control Dependency Solutions:

– Typically easier and less costly to implement

– Can often be deployed remotely through software updates

– May have a quicker turnaround time for implementation

– Allows for more flexibility in adjusting the solution if needed

Hardware Changes:

– Usually more complex and expensive to implement

– Require physical access to the product for modifications

– May take longer to design, test, and deploy

– Often provide more permanent or robust solutions for certain issues

The choice between control dependency and hardware changes depends on the nature of the root cause and the most effective way to address it. In some cases, a combination of both may be necessary.

Updating Products in the Field.

When dealing with a large number of units already sold and deployed (e.g., 10,000+ units), updating the solution in the field becomes a significant challenge. Consider the following approaches:

1. Remote Updates: If possible, implement solutions through remote software updates. This method is cost-effective and can reach a large number of units quickly.

2. Phased Rollout: Consider a phased approach, starting with a small subset of units to test the solution’s effectiveness before full deployment.

3. Customer Communication: Develop a clear communication plan to inform customers about the issue, the solution, and the update process.

4. Service Centers: For hardware changes or complex updates, establish service centers or partner with local technicians to perform the necessary modifications.

5. Recall Programs: In cases of critical issues, implement a recall program to ensure all affected units are updated or replaced.

6. Documentation: Provide detailed documentation and support materials to guide customers or technicians through the update process.

Time to See Improvement

The time required to see improvements after implementing a solution can vary significantly based on several factors:

1. Nature of the Problem: Some issues may show immediate improvement once addressed, while others might require time to manifest positive results

2. Scale of Deployment: With a large number of units in the field, it may take time to update all devices and gather sufficient data to confirm improvement.

3. Data Collection and Analysis: Establish a system to collect and analyze performance data from updated units to measure improvement over time.

4. User Adaptation: If the solution involves changes to user interfaces or workflows, allow time for users to adapt to the new system.

5. Environmental Factors: Consider external factors that may influence the solution’s effectiveness and how they might vary over time.

6. Continuous Monitoring: Implement ongoing monitoring to track long-term improvements and identify any unforeseen issues that may arise.

Typically, you should plan for at least a few weeks to a few months of observation and data collection to confidently assess the solution’s effectiveness. However, some immediate indicators of improvement may be visible shortly after implementation.

Conclusion

Implementing solutions after identifying root causes requires careful consideration of the type of change needed, the logistics of updating products in the field, and the timeline for seeing improvements. By thoroughly planning the implementation process and considering these factors, organizations can effectively address issues and improve product performance. Remember that solution implementation is often an iterative process, and be prepared to make adjustments based on real-world feedback and performance data.

Filed Under: Articles, on Product Reliability, Reliability Knowledge

About Semion Gengrinovich

In my current role, leveraging statistical reliability engineering and data-driven approaches to drive product improvements and meet stringent healthcare industry standards. Im passionate about sharing knowledge through webinars, podcasts and development resources to advance reliability best practices.

« How to Adopt World Class Maintenance
The Shop-Floor Guide to DPPM vs. DPMO »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Reliability Knowlege series logo Photo of Semion GengrinovichArticles & Videos by Semion Gengrinovich
in the Reliability Knowledge article & video series

Recent Posts

  • The Dirge of the MTBF Bias
  • The Shop-Floor Guide to DPPM vs. DPMO
  • Design Change Implementation
  • How to Adopt World Class Maintenance
  • Should We Outsource

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

Book the Course with John
  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.
This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.