Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
    • Reliability Engineering Management DRAFT
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Michael Pfeifer, Ph.D., P.E. Leave a Comment

Failure Mode and Mechanism

Failure Mode and Mechanism

In a previous article I discussed the degradation of materials due to exposure to stressors (use conditions) and how to identify stressors. Cracks form and grow in axles and shafts due to cyclic stress, steel screws corrode when exposed to water, some plastics become brittle when exposed to sunlight, and coatings on surfaces can wear away. When too much degradation occurs, components and joints fail, leading to product failure.

Things to consider during design

If you’re someone who likes to design reliable products, you must think about the stressors and their effects. When designing a product, we must identify the following things

  • The stressors that will be acting on the components and joints
  • Potential degradation mechanisms
  • The amount of degradation that is acceptable
  • Whether the degradation will lead to component or joint failure
  • The failure mode

This information guides decisions about the mechanical form and materials to use components and joints, the control measures to put in place to ensure that components and joints are fabricated properly, and testing to evaluate product reliability.

I already discussed stressors in a previous article. Two important terms in this list are failure mode and failure mechanism. Understanding their difference and keeping them straight is important.

Failure mechanism

Failure mechanism is the physical process of materials degradation that leads to failure. Here are some examples of failure mechanisms:

  • Cracking of a support member exposed to cyclic stress from vibration
  • Intergranular corrosion of 304 stainless steel pipe exposed to water
  • Crevice corrosion of a bolt and washer exposed to water and road salt
  • Fretting wear of a circuit board pad and contact during thermal cycling
  • Adhesive wear of two rollers moving against each other
Intergranular corrosion
Circuit board pad fretting wear

These are just a few of the many different degradation and failure mechanisms. Notice that for corrosion and wear there is more than one degradation mechanism. So, saying that a component will fail by corrosion or wear is not specific enough to understand the actual mechanism and make design decisions to prevent the degradation.

Failure mode

Failure mode is how a component or joint stops functioning. So, for the previous examples we have the following failure modes:

  • Fracture
  • Leak
  • Loss of clamping force
  • High electrical resistance
  • Change in surface profile

Identifying stressors, failure mode, and failure mechanism

A valuable engineering tool used to identify the information is Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). The tool helps focus engineering teams on the factors that influence their products’ reliability and how to address the factors through design decisions, specifications and other control measures, and testing to evaluate reliability.

Using FMEA requires discipline because the process can seem arduous, though it’s really just boring. However, the benefits are tremendous when the efforts result in products that pass reliability testing the first time and field failures don’t occur.

Attend our January 26 workshop to learn about galvanic corrosion and how to design to prevent it.

  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.

Filed Under: Articles, Metals Engineering and Product Reliability, on Product Reliability

« Is it Time to Kill Your Organization to Build a Better One?
How ADA Compliance Improves Communication for Reliability Engineers »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of Michael PfeiferArticles by Michael Pfeifer, Ph.D., P.E.
in the Metals Engineering and Product Reliability article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Why Total Productive Maintenance Is The Answer To Reliability-Centered Culture
  • 17 Powerful Insights on Effective Communication Using FINESSE
  • Surprising Insights from Simple Run Charts
  • Risk is Round
  • Why Isn’t It Working Like You Said?

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.