Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg 11 Comments

Fault Tree Analysis 8 Step Process

Fault Tree Analysis 8 Step Process

Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) provides a means to logically and graphically display the paths to failure for a system or component. One way to manage a complex system is to start with a  reliability block diagram (RBD). Then create a fault tree for each block in the RBD.

Whether a single block or a top level fault for a system the basic process to create a fault tree follows a basic pattern.

1. Define the system. This includes the scope of the analysis including defining what is considered a failure. This becomes important when a system may have an element fail or a single function fails and the remainder of the system still operates.

2. Define top-level faults. Whether for a system or single block define the starting point for the analysis by detailing the failure of interest for the analysis.

3. Identify causes for top-level fault. What events could cause the top level fault to occur? Use the logic gate symbols to organize which causes can cause the failure alone (or), or require multiple events to occur before the failure occurs (and).

4. Identify next level of events. Each event leading to the top level failure may also have precipitating events.

5. Identify root causes. For each event above continue to identify precipitating events or causes to identify the root or basic cause of the sequence of events leading to failure.

6. Add probabilities to events. When possible add the actual or relative probability of occurrence of each event.

7. Analysis the fault tree. Look for the most likely events that lead to failure, for single events the initiate multiple paths to failure, or patterns related to stresses, use, or operating conditions. Identify means to resolve or mitigate paths to failure.

8. Document the FTA. Beyond the fault tree, graphics include salient notes from the discussion and action items.

FTA is a convent means to logically think through the many ways a failure may occur. It provides insights that may lead to product improvements or process controls.


Related:

Benefits of Fault Tree Analysis (article)

Intro to Fault Tree Analysis (article)

Fault Tolerance Basics (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Reliability in Design and Development Tagged With: Fault Tree Analysis and Success Tree Analysis

« Benefits of Fault Tree Analysis
Sources of Variation »

Comments

  1. Mulyadi says

    May 1, 2015 at 1:19 AM

    Hi Fred. Thank you for the informative step-by-step revelations process of FTA. I am novice to this. I have seen FTA’s, which have the “OR”s & “AND”s. It would be great if you have an example of a complete FTA.

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      May 1, 2015 at 1:24 AM

      Hi Mulyadi, I’ll look into developing a couple full examples. In the meantime there are a few that are available online. This slideset from NASA, http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/codeq/risk/docs/ftacourse.pdf, has a couple pretty good examples.

      Cheers,

      Fred

      Reply
  2. David Olsen says

    April 3, 2020 at 2:55 PM

    Are there any companies using Artificial Analysis t to perform Fault Tree Analyses?

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      April 4, 2020 at 8:41 AM

      Hi David, if you mean artificial intelligence, I’m not sure. If it’s artificial analysis I’ve no idea what that means other than the way my roommate did homework in college, at times. cheers, Fred

      Reply
  3. Gaki Zangmo says

    October 25, 2020 at 2:32 AM

    Hi, can FTA be used to find the values of reliability indices for reliability analysis?

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      October 25, 2020 at 7:47 AM

      Hi Gaki,

      Technically yes it can, yet there are better tools to estimate reliability for an item or function. The FTA starts with a top unwanted outcome (like system failure or power supply failure) then lays out the various paths of events that may lead to the unwanted top event. Then working out the probability of each element in all the paths one can sort out the probability of the top event.

      I tend to use a reliability block diagram to organize the reliability information and conduct calculations – at least for me it’s easier.

      cheers,

      Fred

      Reply
  4. huma says

    June 7, 2022 at 7:40 AM

    helo sir how i can make the fault tree analysis diagram of event management system

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      June 7, 2022 at 7:46 AM

      Hi – not familiar with an event management system, yet the typical use of an FTA is to start with the top unwanted outcome – and work through the process to identify elements that could lead to the unwanted outcome.
      cheers,

      Fred

      Reply
      • huma says

        June 7, 2022 at 7:59 AM

        sir any help please

        Reply
        • Fred Schenkelberg says

          June 7, 2022 at 8:03 AM

          well, for the event management system, what would be an unwanted outcome, a failure of the system? That then would be the top block, then follow the remaining steps outlined in the article.

          Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.