Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by JD Solomon Leave a Comment

How Reliability Engineers Can Improve Their Communication in Information Sessions

How Reliability Engineers Can Improve Their Communication in Information Sessions

There was a lot to unpack from the 45-minute information session. After all, three different governmental units evaluated the issue for over three years. We had not had a debriefing on the issue in a year. And the issue was an emerging one, ripe with complexity and uncertainty. Effective communication can be difficult in these types of information sessions.


As a board member, I was also a little disappointed with the presentation by the staff. The presenter was a senior official who was normally very good at presenting complex, complicated information in a manner easily digestible to a broad audience. The 45-minute information session was an uninspiring B-. These are a few lessons learned.


Information Sessions Are Invitations to Wander

Technical professionals usually get three to five minutes to address decision makers. Milestone (an action or event marking a significant change or stage) information sessions are common with problems with high levels of complexity and uncertainty because resolution usually takes years. Milestone-type information sessions provide some freedom to roam for 20 to 30 minutes. However, wandering the entire time does not equate to a more effective presentation.


The Fundamentals of Structure Are Always Important

Milestone-type information sessions need a structure. The choice of a topical-based structure for the main body of the presentation is a good one. However, in this case, there was not enough attention paid to the Opening. The entire presentation suffered from early confusion on how everything tied together. More time does mean that the fundamentals of structure are less important.

I recently watched US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell provide a summary of two days of Federal Reserve Board meetings. I later analyzed it and published the findings. Powell presented two days of meetings, including all of the uncertainty and complexity of the US economy in 10 minutes and in less than 1500 concise words. Technical professionals can do that too, if we use a formal approach like FINESSE and have the proper Structure.


Provide Relevance to the Target Audience

Milestone-type information can wrongly take a research & development form where the message is ‘well, that’s the status of our activities and information to date.’ Wrong! You are presenting to decision makers because your work fits into their realm of resource allocation. Tell them how your work fits into the context of their future actions and what steps they can take in the interim to help you advise them in the future.

In most cases, a guiding graphic can be provided to show the overall progress of where the team has been and where it is going. The guiding graphic is more decorative than informational (think of it more as an atlas than as Google maps on your phone), but it does relieve the tendency that many presenters have to share too many process details that the decision makers have little interest.


Provide Your Information in Advance

In this case example, the information was properly provided in writing before the session. However, the advance information did not provide the key points and overarching linkages. This equated to one missed opportunity in the up-front material and another missed opportunity in the verbal presentation.

 

Applying It

The fundamentals of Communicating with FINESSE apply to information sessions. Good Structure, the fifth bone of FINESSE, is important in longer sessions. So is Empathy – after all, all decision makers have more than one thing on their plate. And the average attention span of civilized humans is down from 12 seconds to 8 seconds.

You have no more than 15 minutes to make your points in an information session, despite whether you are allowed 30, 45, or even 60 minutes. Strive for effective communication regardless of the session format.


Founded by JD Solomon, Communicating with FINESSE is the community of technical professionals dedicated to more effective communication of decisions with high levels of complexity and uncertainty. Learn more about our publications, webinars, and workshops. Join the community for free.

Filed Under: Articles, Communicating with FINESSE, on Systems Thinking

« FMEA Detection Risk: Insights and Advices
History Repeats Itself: Buncefield, Puerto Rico, Jaipur »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of JD SolomonArticles by JD Solomon
in the Communicating with FINESSE article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Risk Prioritization in FMEA – a Summary
  • What Are Best Practices for Facilitating Qualitative Assessments?
  • So, What’s Still Wrong with Maintenance
  • Foundation of Great Project Outcomes – Structures
  • What is the Difference Between Quality Assurance and Quality Control?

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.