Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • CMMSradio
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Asset Performance
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Hero
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • The RCA
      • Communicating with FINESSE
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Hardware Product Develoment Lifecycle
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
      • FMEA Introduction
      • AIAG & VDA FMEA Methodology
    • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction
      • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Home » Articles » on Product Reliability » Reliability Knowledge » How to Define Proper Product Reliability Goal

by Semion Gengrinovich Leave a Comment

How to Define Proper Product Reliability Goal

How to Define Proper Product Reliability Goal

Defining a proper product reliability goal is a critical step in ensuring that a product meets customer expectations and performs adequately throughout its intended lifespan. This also involves a careful balance between the required level of reliability and the associated costs and complexities of achieving that reliability.

Here’s how to approach this:

Testing Time and Design Complexity

The level of reliability required for a product will directly influence the amount of testing time and the complexity of the design process. More stringent reliability goals typically necessitate longer testing periods and more sophisticated design approaches.

  • Assess Reliability Requirements: Determine the level of reliability needed based on the product’s intended use, customer expectations, and competitive benchmarks.

As example: Let’s consider a company that designs and manufactures electric cars.

Intended Use: The car is intended for daily commuting and long-distance travel. Therefore, the reliability requirements would include a high Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF), indicating that the car can operate for a long time without breaking down. The car should also have a high availability, meaning it should be operational and ready for use whenever the customer needs it.

Customer Expectations: Customers expect the car to be reliable and safe. They would not tolerate frequent breakdowns or failures, especially during long-distance travel. The car should also have features like autopilot, which should work flawlessly. If the car fails to meet these expectations, customers might switch to a competitor.

Competitive Benchmarks: The company needs to benchmark its reliability standards against those of its competitors. If a competitor’s car has an MTBF of 100,000 hours, the company should aim for an MTBF that is at least as high, if not higher. The company can use methods like surveys, interviews, and focus groups to gather data on competitors’ reliability standards.

  • Estimate Testing Time: Calculate the time required for thorough testing, including development, validation, and accelerated life testing to simulate long-term use in a shorter time frame.

It is derived from the reliability function of the Weibull distribution and the binomial distribution for zero failures. The formula is:

$$ \displaystyle \frac{t}{t_{0}}=\left(\frac{N\cdot\textrm{ln}R}{\textrm{ln}\left(1-CL\right)}\right)^{\frac{1}{\beta}} $$

where:

$- t -$ is the test duration,

$- t_{0} -$ is the target time,

$- N-$ is the sample size,

$- R-$ is the reliability,

$- CI-$ is the confidence interval, and

$- \bets -$ is the shape parameter of the Weibull distribution.

Given that the shape parameter (beta) is 1.2, no failures are allowed, and the reliability requirement is R90C90 with a target time of 100,000 hours, you can substitute these values into the formula to calculate the test duration. However, the sample size (N) is not given in your question, so you would need to determine this value first.

  • Design for Reliability (DfR): Implement DfR practices early in the design phase to anticipate and mitigate potential failure modes.

The DFMEA process is a critical tool in the DfR methodology, helping to detect potential failures impacting reliability or safety before they occur. By identifying and mitigating these risks early in the design process, DFMEA can help to significantly reduce the costs and impacts of unreliability.

DFMEA defining failure modes by Pareto low 20% of failure modes are lead to 80% of total product failures.

Complexity vs. Cost: Evaluate the trade-offs between increased design complexity and the costs involved, including the potential need for more advanced materials or technologies.

Alignment with Warranty and Financial Support

The reliability goal should align with the warranty period and the financial resources the company is willing to allocate for warranty support and potential failure remediation.

  • Warranty Analysis: Define the warranty period and understand the implications for reliability goals. The reliability target should ensure that failures are minimized within this period to reduce warranty claims.
  • Financial Planning: Consider the financial impact of the reliability goal, including the costs of additional testing, potential warranty claims, and the investment in quality and reliability improvements.
  • Risk Management: Analyze the risks associated with not meeting the reliability goal, such as increased warranty costs, customer dissatisfaction, and potential damage to the company’s reputation.

To define a proper product reliability goal, you must consider the required testing time and design complexity to achieve the desired reliability level. This goal must be well-aligned with the warranty period and the financial resources available for warranty support. Balancing these factors will help ensure that the product meets both customer expectations and the company’s financial objectives.

Filed Under: Articles, on Product Reliability, Reliability Knowledge

About Semion Gengrinovich

In my current role, leveraging statistical reliability engineering and data-driven approaches to drive product improvements and meet stringent healthcare industry standards. Im passionate about sharing knowledge through webinars, podcasts and development resources to advance reliability best practices.

« Equipment Failure Probability Density Functions
MTBF is Not a Duration »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Reliability Knowlege series logo Photo of Semion GengrinovichArticles & Videos by Semion Gengrinovich
in the Reliability Knowledge article & video series

Recent Posts

  • Quality Objective 7: HIGH-RISK FAILURES IDENTIFIED
  • Robust Design Introduction
  • KPIs and Maintenance Planning
  • 7 Proven Strategies to Protect Your Supply Chain
  • Progress in USAF Engine Logistics?

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

Book the Course with John
  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.
This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.