Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM BlitzĀ®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERMĀ® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
    • Reliability Engineering Management DRAFT
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Greg Hutchins Leave a Comment

The Low Bid: Who’s Risk?

The Low Bid: Who’s Risk?

Guest Post byĀ Malcolm PeartĀ (first posted on CERMĀ Ā® RISK INSIGHTS – reposted here with permission)

The Low Bid: Who’s Risk?

We live in a competitive environment and business generates the money that makes the world go round, or at least should do.Ā  Money is the medium of exchange for goods and services and allows society as we know it and the global economy to function.

Those who have money engage those who want money to provide them with products or services and this is done through contracts.Ā  Contracts are awarded at a price that the person who has the money (the Client) is prepared to pay and ā€˜the winner’ is typically the lowest compliant bid.

If compliance isn’t met then there is suffering somewhere. It can be the Client, the Bidder, the end user or all three and on Government projects it’s the taxpayer who, inevitably, pays.

The Risk

The end users suffer if contracts aren’t met.Ā  As an extreme case, the astronaut John Glenn (1921 – 2016) exemplified this when he said:

As I hurtled through space, one thought kept crossing my mind – every part of this rocket was supplied by the lowest bidder…

In a more down-to-earth setting the end-user may think along similar lines when there are power cuts, water shortages, garbage pile ups, traffic disruptions, rail and airport delays and accidents.

The Cause

So, why would a bidder put in a low bid…is it:

  • a ā€˜loss lead’ to nurture a future relationship.
  • a plain mistake and a failure to price the job correctly.
  • a vane attempt to increase turnover without the sanity of profit.
  • desperation to keep the company afloat.
  • an effort to look good while underbidding and eradicating the competition

No matter what the reason, if the low bid is compliant and it’s accepted, it’s everybody’s risk.

The Consequences

For the Client, he is left with a reneging supplier and is then obliged to terminate the contract or possibly pay more.Ā  The supplier may be forced into liquidation and cease to exist as a business entity.Ā  The end-user isn’t supplied.

The consequences were summed up in an eloquent manner by John Ruskin in the 19thCentury when he said:

If you deal with the lowest bidder, it is well to add something for the risk you run, and if you do that you will have enough to pay for something better…

For the supplier who has the low bid and operates at a loss his business may fail. In the paraphrased words of Dickens’ Mr Micawber it’s a fine line between misery and happiness:

ā€œIncome $20.00, Expenditure $19.99 cents: result, happiness. Income $20.00, Expenditure $20.01: result, misery.ā€

And for the end users who may think that the low bid is a bargain we should remind ourselves of Benjamin Franklin’s sagely observation some two hundred years ago:

ā€œThe bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgottenā€.

However the consequences can reach much further when the low bidder eventually realises there is a problem and the supply chain is affected.Ā  Somebody, somewhere, may gamble on providing things cheaper and a downward spiral of undercutting develops.Ā  But, as the problem grows and people strive to keep their business afloat they will, like the proverbial drowning man, clutch at straws.

Mitigation

Clients should be prudent about the apparent bargain that lands at their feet and consider the consequences that can ensue if it is accepted.Ā  ā€œNever look a gift horse in the mouthā€ is true but the ā€˜low bid’ is business, not a gift.

The low bid may have to be accepted because of financial rules that may demand that the lowest compliant bid is acceptable.Ā  In these circumstances it’s a self imposed problem as Finance Officers do their job by rote resulting in satisfactory underperformance and plausible deniability as the ā€œrulesā€ are followed blindly.

On the other hand, there is the opportunity to accept a more realistic bid, exercise caution and then decide upon a sustainable solution.

Reality

A low bid represents a risk so why, with our risk management skills, do we choose the low bid.Ā  It should not be about the ā€˜bargain’, it should be about prudence.

For the Client it’s caveat emptor but for the low bidder it’s caveat venditor…

Bio:

MBA, MSc DIC, BSc; Chartered Engineer, Chartered Geologist, PMP

Over thirty years’ experience on large multidisciplinary infrastructure projects including rail, metro systems, airports, roads, marine works and reclamation, hydropower, tunnels and underground excavations.

Project management; design & construction management; and contract administrative in all project phases from feasibility, planning & design, procurement, implementation, execution and completion on Engineer’s Design and Design & Build schemes.

Filed Under: Articles, CERMĀ® Risk Insights, on Risk & Safety

« Are We There Yet?
Wrecking a Mature PdM Program »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CERMĀ® Risk Insights series Article by Greg Hutchins, Editor and noted guest authors

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • How to Structure Your ERM System
  • Rate of Occurrence of Failure
  • What is Six Sigma and How is it Used in Quality Engineering?
  • Terrorism Risk Insurance Act Exclusions: Gray Coverage Areas
  • Why Total Productive Maintenance Is The Answer To Reliability-Centered Culture

© 2023 FMS Reliability Ā· Privacy Policy Ā· Terms of Service Ā· Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading ourĀ Cookies Policy.