Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Old Preventive Maintenance (PM) Out, New Preventive Maintenance (PvM) In

Old Preventive Maintenance (PM) Out, New Preventive Maintenance (PvM) In

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE STRATEGY IN A PLANT WELLNESS WAY EAM SYSTEM-OF-RELIABILITY

IN A PWW EAM SYSTEM-OF-RELIABILITY, PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE STRATEGY IS TO REPLACE PARTS WHEN EXCESSIVE STRESS BUILD-UPS IN THEIR MICRO-STRUCTURE

—

Once you adopt the new Preventive Maintenance strategy, practices and timing, your operating equipment risk drops so low that you don’t need expensive condition monitoring solutions

Old Preventive Maintenance was reserved only for wearing parts renewal. The new view of Preventive Maintenance strategy is to use PvM to ensure zero parts failure from stress accumulation within component micro-structures. Without parts failure from over-stress you can get zero equipment failure. It’s a foundational concept used in Plant Wellness Way life-cycle asset management strategy.

In this article, Preventive Maintenance has the acronym ‘PvM’. It’s a simple way to differentiate the new view of thinking about Preventive Maintenance from the old paradigm of replacing worn-out parts. We relegate the old PM acronym to use for Planned Maintenance (PM).

Preventive Maintenance is no longer only for parts that wear-out. In new Preventive Maintenance thinking you replace over-stressed parts causing too much risk. As well as the parts that are worn-out, you intentionally replace parts that are tired, aged, and degraded just before they fail. The image below encapsulates the new view of Preventive Maintenance strategy—create a life cycle asset management system that eliminates the chance of component failure, and renew a part as PvM when internal stress accumulation becomes too risky.

The choice when to do PvM is wholly micro-structure stress dependent. Preventive Maintenance is used everywhere there is excessive stress accumulation! You proactively manage and reduce stress accumulation within a component to control when the part needs to be replaced. Once you know when the service duty stresses have built up too much, you know when to renew the part. Start counting and measuring stress accumulation and PvM strategy becomes a low cost and simple way to get and maintain utmost plant and equipment reliability.

TO GET ALL THE BENEFITS AND SAVINGS POSSIBLE FROM PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE, YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND WHAT PVM IS REALLY ALL ABOUT

Your aim is to intentionally create the ‘knee’ in the asset wellness curve shown in the image. You use your life cycle asset management system to give you zero chance of failure during operating life. You also use your life cycle asset management system to control where the knee is located and replicate that point over and over again. By using a faithful system that repeats the position of the bend, you no longer need to do condition monitoring. Your life cycle asset management processes ensure zero chance of parts failure until the part has built-up so much stress that the chance of failure rapidly rises.

I love using PvM everywhere it can possibly be applied. It keeps maintenance simple to plan and to do. It minimizes your spare parts inventory, since you buy parts just-in-time. You don’t need a warehouse full of spares because you replace parts before they break. Provided you have world class Precision Maintenance (PrM) capability, you’d use PvM a lot to get zero breakdowns.

You must always use parts that are in “as-new condition” for Preventive Maintenance replacement or rebuild. Old parts that have been in service contain accumulated stresses and micro-structure damage. If you use old parts, or reclaim parts and refurbish them for reuse, you have no idea how much stresses they contain and how much life remains before they fail. Only with new parts can you be certain of what internal stresses are present and how stressed the micro-structure actually is. If you decide to use old parts in your plant and machines, you’ll also need to introduce condition monitoring of them, because you have no idea when the part will fail. At least with condition monitoring, you have a good chance of spotting a coming failure early enough to prevent breakdown.

PARTS OVER-STRESS PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE STRATEGY IS FUNDAMENTAL IN PLANT WELLNESS WAY EAM

Creating zero chance of parts failure and controlling the bend in the wellness curve are achieved with Plant Wellness Way Enterprise Asset Management methodology. Plant Wellness Way EAM puts world-class reliability, maintenance, and operating strategy and practices into your organization’s processes. Stress reduction and stress prevention are key tactics that you embed into your company when Plant Wellness Way EAM is used to get maximum plant and equipment reliability. You purposely design and build your life cycle asset management processes, supply chain processes, maintenance processes, and operating processes to get zero chance of failure during a part’s service lifetime.

Moving the knee further and further along the service life axis is done through innovation. The innovations can come from anywhere and from anyone. Every improvement in operating life that extends the duration between preventive maintenance renewals is a good improvement to do. The most likely people who have useful innovations will be the operators, maintainers, maintenance engineers, and the original equipment manufacturer.

THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS ON MEANINGFUL DEFINITIONS FOR PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE

The text book definition of Preventive Maintenance depends on which text book you read. Today, Saturday 9 December 2017, there are four different definitions for Preventive Maintenance on Wikipedia. None of the explanations are completely correct, and none of the four agree with each other. In your own company you must have only one definition of Preventive Maintenance, with a meaning that is agreed by everyone across the organization, world-wide.

If you replace a part with a new part using a criterion from its service life, you are doing preventive maintenance. Look for 1) preset time period, or service duty, and 2) the part is replaced regardless of condition. Then you have found a Preventive Maintenance job. Criteria used to schedule old-style Preventive Maintenance include time-in-service; production throughput; number of cycles; age from new for degrading materials, like rubber; etc.

When a scheduled maintenance work order that people call a “PM work order” asks you to check, or inspect, or to observe, or to do a test, or take a measurement, and, depending on what you find, you replace the part or return it back to standard, you are doing condition based maintenance (CBM). CBM is also known as Predictive Maintenance (PdM). It’s easy to differentiate PvM from PdM. In PdM, the part’s observed condition determines if it is maintained. For PdM you look for 1) condition check(s), and 2) on-condition rectification.

Yes, both PdM and PvM are Planned Maintenance (PM) when they appear as scheduled maintenance work, but each is a totally different job type with completely different purposes to the other. Be sure your Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) always differentiates the type of a planned maintenance work order—clearly identify and distinguish PdM from PvM. Otherwise you confuse everyone in your company and supply chain for evermore.

The debate that often starts now is, if the condition indicates that rectification is required, is the restitution work categorized as Corrective Maintenance (CM)?

In the Maintenance Manager role, I’d ask my people to do the following. If the rectification can be done simply, safely and correctly immediately after the on-condition check indicates a problem, then do the restitution on the same PdM work order, and provide a complete and thorough job history of what was done. For example, when a drive belt needs alignment, do it immediately and record the details in the PdM work order history. If instead, the restitution requires more than what can be done at that opportunity, or the opportunity cannot be taken for production, safety, or supply chain reasons (etc.), then close the PdM work with a complete and thorough job history, and open a Corrective Maintenance work order to do the repair. Be sure to link the ‘child’ CM work order to the parent ‘PdM’ work order so the maintenance history records tell the repair followed the discovery of an on-condition problem.

To learn all about Plant Wellness Way EAM and what it can do for your site—simply ask an approved consultant. Our office details are noted on the Contact Us webpage.

All the very best to you,

Mike Sondalini | Plant Wellness Way EAM System-of-Reliability


A question from a Reader: “Could I have more insight of the terms and their benefits, and also, how to do the PdM and PvM as Planned Maintenance (PM)?”

I have seen PM defined as Preventive Maintenance and also as Planned Maintenance—that’s a sure way to cause confusion. To help people clarify the meaning of the acronym ‘PM’ it must be exactly defined. In an organization there must not be two different meanings for ‘PM’.

In the article, PM is set as Planned Maintenance, which is maintenance work that is reviewed and prepared for executing, i.e. a work pack for the job is completed. Once PM is first defined as Planned Maintenance it cannot again be used to specify Preventive Maintenance. In the article ‘PvM’ is made the acronym for Preventive Maintenance. Preventive Maintenance is the recurring replacement of degrading equipment items before they get to a condition that greatly increases the risk of equipment failure.

Predictive Maintenance has the acronym PdM, which fortunately is the standard used around the English-speaking world. Predictive Maintenance is the inspection of equipment items to review their in-service condition and determine their remaining service-life.

Using the words ‘Planned Maintenance’ implies the maintenance work is organized, with all the requirements to complete the job from start to finish known and specified. Preventive Maintenance jobs become Planned Maintenance when they are reviewed and prepared for execution. Similarly, Predictive Maintenance jobs become Planned Maintenance when they are reviewed and prepared for execution.

Preventive Maintenance that recurs, e.g. 3-monthly, annually, .etc., should have a work pack that was developed when the PvM job was first established. The existence of the work pack makes recurring PvM jobs Planned Maintenance. The same applies for recurring PdM jobs—when they were first established a work pack covering the condition monitoring inspection requirements was developed. If you run a forecast of future maintenance work the list will contain PvM and PdM jobs. PvM work orders will have replacement tasks and PdM work orders will have inspection tasks. Each category is a different type of maintenance work, but the work orders are still both Planned Maintenance.

Filed Under: Articles, Life Cycle Asset Management, on Maintenance Reliability

« Strategy Focused Management System Improves Performance
Utilizing CMMS/EAM for Defect Elimination »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of Mike SondaliniArticles by Mike Sondalini
in the Life Cycle Asset Management article series
articles provided with permission of Plant Wellness Way EAM and Lifetime Reliability Solutions

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Risk And Safety
  • Risk Prioritization in FMEA – a Summary
  • What Are Best Practices for Facilitating Qualitative Assessments?
  • So, What’s Still Wrong with Maintenance
  • Foundation of Great Project Outcomes – Structures

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.