Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Optimizing Maintenance

Optimizing Maintenance

One of the considerations when planning maintenance is the timing of the replacement of parts of the system. In some cases it makes sense to wait for the item to fail, sometimes, it makes sense to place it on an interval or set an amount of operating time, and yet in others, we can measure indicators that a replacement is necessary.

In order to make these decisions, we need data.

According to O’Connor and Kleyner (Practical Reliability Engineering, 5th Ed.), we need specific information for each part. The following list outlines the recommended information.

1. The time-to-failure distribution parameters for the main failure modes.

This involves keeping track of when an item is placed into service when it fails, and the nature of the failure. Additionally if possible track down and record the root cause of the failure. A focus on failure mechanisms also is useful as the item failing may not be the only place to implement an improvement or repair. The failed item may be the hero that received the damage when some other element’s failure (misbehavior) instigated the fault.

This information provides you the ability to schedule, if it makes sense, part replacement before failure occurs.

2. The effects of all failure modes.

Not all failures are the same. Some cause serious safety risks, some are barely noticeable or easily ignored. This information provides a means to prioritize inspections or replacements.

The information allows us to focus on minimizing the serious effects of failure.

3. The cost of failure.

Like effects, not all failures incur the same costs. You can use this information to prioritize replacement strategies to minimize both the cost of the parts & maintenance activity and the cost of the resulting failures.

4. The cost of scheduled replacement.

The costs include labor, parts, and associated element so doing the replacement, it also includes the cost of downtime – did you really need to shut down the line for the repair based on the schedule. It had better be worth it to avoid more costly downtime later due to failure.

5. The likely effect of maintenance on reliability.

Some maintenance restores the equipment to like-new conditions, some just keep the equipment running. Track the impact of maintenance on the subsequent failure rates to determine what is useful or not so useful

If we are able to measure indicators or an element of a replaceable item (vehicle tire tread depth, for example) we can anticipate failures shortly before they occur.

To do so, we need two more bits of information.

6. The rate at which defects propagate to cause failure.

Do we have time before the unit is likely to fail or require replacement? Can we get more value out of the existing equipment before doing repairs? We can answer these questions is tracking the rate of degradation.

7. The cost of inspection or test.

Even just looking costs money. It takes time. Sometimes the inspection is very expensive and should be considered when balancing the benefit of the measure with the ability to avoid even more costly failures.

The information provides a means to make decisions to optimize your preventative reliability program.


Related:

Field Industry and Public Failure Data (article)

Program Elements Part 1 (article)

8 Factors of Design for Maintainability (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Maintainability and Availability Tagged With: Preventive Maintenance (PM) Analysis

« When to Conduct HALT
When to Do FMEA »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.