Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by James Kovacevic Leave a Comment

Who Owns the Storeroom? Maintenance or Procurement?

Understanding who owns the storeroom processes and stocking strategy

There are two different perspectives on the maintenance storeroom.  These perspectives are on who owns the operation of the storeroom.  Some believe that Maintenance owns the storeroom and the operation of it.  Others believe it is Procurement, or potentially Logistics or Warehousing.  Some organizations require the storerooms to be operated by a consistent group, while others leave it up to the site.

Regardless of the approach, there are many different advantages and disadvantages to any of the approaches.  There is no right way; there is only the way that works for your organization.  However, some specifics must be considered when establishing who owns the storeroom, its business processes and the purchasing of the parts.

Maintenance Needs to Define the Material Needs

The goal of the maintenance department is to define the equipment strategy, including any material requirements.   Stating material requirements is not as simple as “have these in stock.”  The material requirements need to be defined in a way that states the average consumption rate, consequences if the part is not in stock, and how much lead time will be provided when the part is required.

Why is this required?  It enables procurement to make the right decisions in what to stock, what to have suppliers keep on their shelves, and how much to stock.   Remember, that just because we may need a part, it does not mean that it has to be kept in stock.  This is where Procurement’s expertise comes in.  They know how to manage stock and ensure it is available when it is required.

Quality of Spare Parts

As with the material needs, the quality specification of the part needs to be defined.  Procurement will source parts based on the information provided.  So if you provide them only a bearing number, they will source the cheapest part.   However, if you provide specifications related to quality and performance, Procurement will use that to find the cheapest part that meets the specification.

Procurement may challenge the need for the quality or performance specifications, and they should, as that is their role.  So before you provide quality and performance specifications, make sure they are justified.

Responsibilities Need to be Defined

When the storeroom has multiple functions involved (maintenance and procurement), it is vital that each group understands where their responsibility starts and ends.  This needs to be mapped out via a RACI chart.    For example, if maintenance needs to define the part requirements in the CMMS, and Procurement is responsible for reviewing the demands via a replenishment report, that needs to be defined.

Use Service Level Agreements

Again, when multiple functions are involved, there need to be clear expectations of what is involved and how long the activities should take.  Using the example above, a service level agreement may state that Maintenance needs to provide the material description, manufacturer, part number and specifications in the CMMS, while Procurement has to process any part requests in 24 business hours.

So What Approach is Best?

So who should own the storeroom?  I believe that it should be a collaborative effort leveraging the strengths of each group to accomplish the goals of the storeroom.   This means having Maintenance, Procurement, and any others involved work together, regardless of who owns the storeroom.

Who owns the storeroom in your organization? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the current setup?

If you need help in educating your staff on MRO best practices, please contact jkovacevic@eruditio.com for assistance.  Eruditio offers the unique iBL (inspired blended learning) curriculum that separates their training apart from all others.

I’m James Kovacevic
Principal Instructor at Eruditio
Where Education Meets Application

Follow @EruditioLLC
Follow @ReliableJames
Follow @EruditioLLC

References;

  • Eruditio
  • iBLTraining.com

Filed Under: Articles, Maintenance and Reliability, on Maintenance Reliability

« Change and Resistance Are Futile
How Failed Parts Work Into an RCA »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Maintenance & Reliability series


by James Kovacevic
High Performance Reliability

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Risk And Safety
  • Risk Prioritization in FMEA – a Summary
  • What Are Best Practices for Facilitating Qualitative Assessments?
  • So, What’s Still Wrong with Maintenance
  • Foundation of Great Project Outcomes – Structures

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.