Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM BlitzĀ®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERMĀ® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Greg Hutchins Leave a Comment

US Government ERM Requirement Finalized

US Government ERM Requirement Finalized

Guest Post byĀ Greg HutchinsĀ (first posted on CERMĀ Ā® RISK INSIGHTS – reposted here with permission)

We’ve been discussing how ISO 9001:2015 has adopted Risk Based Thinking that will impact 1.2 million companies. Ā ISO 14001:2015 will impact 400,000 companies. Ā Now, government agencies are adopting and putting into statute risk management.

We’ve been talking up the fact the US government is requiring Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), specifically Office of Management and Budget Circular OMB A 123, of all US departments. Ā This is a game changer for federal agencies. Ā In this article, we’ll look at some of the significant changes in ERM for Federal agencies.

WHAT’S DRIVING THE EMPHASIS ON ERM?

Government throughout the world are all facing the same challenges, specifically:

  • Need to do more with fewer resources.
  • Achieve strategic and tactical objectives more effectively and efficiently.
  • Be able to anticipate events that may disrupt operations.
  • Be able to manage operations due to increasing complexity driven by technology.

The solution is to design and deploy Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) capabilities that are coupled with strategic planning and strategic review process so the government organization can improve mission delivery, reduce costs, and focus on the approrpriate control to mitigate risks . Ā This is a tall order.

SO, WHAT DOES ERM LOOK LIKE IN A FEDERAL AGENCY?

Federal executive management is responsible for:

  • Establishing mission critical operating business objectives.
  • Ensuring compliance with laws and regulations.
  • Managing expected, unexpected, and unanticipated events.
  • Establishing risk management practices to identify, assess, respond, and report on risks.
  • Identifying previously unknown opportunities to improve effectiveness, efficiency, and economics of operations.
  • Designing and deploying internal controls to achieve operational, reporting and compliance objectives.

FEDERAL ERM FRAMEWORK

The Federal risk management framework is showed below. Ā The framework has an ISO 31000 or COSO ERM ā€˜look and feel.’ Ā The risk framework is composed of the following elements:

  • Establish the context.Ā Ā Understanding the internal and external organizational environment.
  • Risk identification.Ā Ā Using a logical approach can look at upside risk opportunities or downside consequences.
  • Analyze and evaluate risks.Ā Ā Assess the likelihood and consequence of the risk occurring.
  • Develop alternatives.Ā Ā Assess the a range of risk response options based on the organizational risk appetite.
  • Respond to risk.Ā Ā Implement the best alternative options discussed in the previous element.
  • Monitor and review.Ā Ā Evaluate risk management performance to determine if it is mitigating risks within risk appetite of the organization.
  • Continuous risk identification.Ā Ā Is an iterative process to evaluate risks and controls.

Screen Shot 2016-07-30 at 12.14.21 PM

An important element of the framework is the concept of the extended enterprise. Ā The risk environment is beyond the boundary of the enterprise. Ā This is important to understand because this means that an organization may have to extend the risk environment or boundary into the supply chain and bring interested parties into the scope of the ERM.

So, how do you get a copy of the OMB A 123? Ā Go to:Ā White House A – 123 Circular.

Tell us what you think?

Filed Under: Articles, CERMĀ® Risk Insights, on Risk & Safety Tagged With: ERM, Risk

« When is DOE Useful?
Benchmarking using Replacement Asset Value »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CERMĀ® Risk Insights series Article by Greg Hutchins, Editor and noted guest authors

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Risk Prioritization in FMEA – a Summary
  • What Are Best Practices for Facilitating Qualitative Assessments?
  • So, What’s Still Wrong with Maintenance
  • Foundation of Great Project Outcomes – Structures
  • What is the Difference Between Quality Assurance and Quality Control?

© 2023 FMS Reliability Ā· Privacy Policy Ā· Terms of Service Ā· Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading ourĀ Cookies Policy.