Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg 13 Comments

4 Effective Risk Mitigation Strategies

4 Effective Risk Mitigation Strategies

Identifying risk is an important first step. It is not sufficient though.

Taking steps to deal with risk is an essential step. Knowing about and thinking about risk is not the same as doing something about risk.

Risk will occur. Some good, some bad. Some minor, some catastrophic. Your ability to mitigate risk allows you to proactively acknowledge and accommodate risks. Let’s talk about four different strategies to mitigate risk: avoid, accept, reduce/control, or transfer.

Avoidance

If a risk presents an unwanted negative consequence, you may be able to completely avoid those consequences. By stepping away from the business activities involved or designing out the causes of the risk you can successfully avoid the occurrence of the undesired events.

One way to avoid risk is to exit the business, cancel the project, close the factory, etc. This has other consequences, yet it is an option.

Another approach is to establish policies and procedures that assist the organization to foresee and avoid high-risk situations. By not starting a project that includes a high unwanted risk successfully avoids that risk.

Testing or screening of products that may have a latent defect which may lead to unwanted and unacceptably high field failures is an option. Screening is not 100% effective yet may reduce the risk of field failures sufficiently.

Design out of a product or process the elements that permit an unwanted risk to arise. A product design change to a more robust material avoids unwanted failures due to unacceptable wear of a less robust material. Implementing engineering design reviews in the product lifecycle process may help identify high-risk areas of a new product or process prior to the decision to start shipping.

Acceptance

Every product produced has a finite chance of failing in the hands of your customer. When that risk is at an acceptable level, sufficiently low estimated field failure rate, then ship the product. Accept the risk.

When the decision to accept the risk is in part based on an estimate or prediction, there is the risk the information incorrectly forecasts the future. Therefore, for high consequence related field failures, closely monitoring field performance or establishing early warning systems may be prudent.

Reduction or control

FMEA, hazard analysis, FTA, and other risk prioritization tools focus help you and your organization identify and prioritize risks. Reducing the probability of occurrence or the severity of the consequences of an unwanted risk (say product failure) is a natural outcome of risk prioritization tools.

If it is not possible to reduce the occurrence or severity, then implementing controls is an option. Controls that either detect causes of unwanted events prior to the consequence occurring during use of the product, or the detection of root causes of unwanted failures that the team can then avoid.

Controls may focus on management or decision-making processes. Improving the ability to find design flaws or to improve the accuracy of field failure rate prediction both improve the ability to make the appropriate decisions concerning risk.

Another method to reduce or control risk is to diversify. Thinking through the mix of products, technologies, markets, operations, and supply chains permit the team the ability to limit the high-risk opportunities to a manageable or acceptable level.

Finally, unwanted events or high field failure rates will occur. Think through both how you will detect the onset of the event and how to respond. It may be wise to stop production and shipping when product failures, even one, has a major consequence (starts a home on fire, for example). Have plans in place. Acting quickly and appropriately may reduce the exposure to more failures/adverse consequences.

Transference

This strategy is to shift the burden of the risk consequence to another party. This may include giving up some control, yet when something goes wrong your organization is not responsible.

This approach may not work to protect your brand image if the product is associated with your organization. Even if the power supply vendor pays for all damages due to failures in their unit, the customer only knows that your product has failed and caused damage. Use this approach with caution.

A conventional means to transfer risk to another organization is with the purchase of insurance. This may require a careful analysis of the presenting risks and probabilities, yet is a viable option in some situations.

Contract terms with suppliers, vendors, contractors, etc may provide a means to shift risk away from your organization. For example, if a power supply fails in an expensive server causing the loss of revenue for a customer, in typical situations, you might ask for and receive a replacement power supply. Or, you could require the power supply vendor to cover the cost of the entire server (which the power supply caused to fail) and the loss experienced by the customer.

Summary of Risk Mitigation Strategies

Avoid, accept, reduce/control, or transfer. For each risk you encounter, you and your organization will have to deal with it. A little forethought and work enable more options than just a major product recall or bankruptcy filing.

Within your organization’s risk management framework there should be both aware of the various strategies along with understanding the guidelines for their implementation.

Engineers and managers throughout the organization make decisions concerning risks every day. Providing a set of clear strategies along with guidance allows the entire organization to appropriately mitigate risks on a daily basis.

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Risk Management Tagged With: Mitigation

« Problems with Peristaltic (Hose) Pumps
6 Steps a Maintenance Professional Can Do to Reduce Email »

Comments

  1. Dikendra Kandel says

    April 6, 2019 at 2:15 AM

    Please send tutorials for risk mitigation

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      April 6, 2019 at 8:14 AM

      thanks for the suggestion – we do not currently have tutorials or short courses on risk mitigation, yet it makes sense to do so. In the meantime, please check out the FMEA resources page for more about one of the basic tools to identify product, process, or system risks.

      Cheers,

      Fred

      Reply
  2. Esmat Tama says

    August 7, 2020 at 5:36 PM

    May I know the published date of this article so that I can use as a reference in my assignment. Thanks in advance..

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      August 9, 2020 at 10:37 AM

      HI Esmat, Since articles on the site are routinely edited and updated and are not time-sensitive topics we do not post the first published dates – for your reference, you can use the “viewed on date” format. cheers, Fred

      Reply
      • Oluwatomi says

        March 26, 2021 at 10:43 AM

        Can you share a sample of ‘how to’ please?

        Reply
        • Fred Schenkelberg says

          March 26, 2021 at 2:36 PM

          Thanks for the request – I’ll look into preparing a set of four “how to” implement articles one for each strategy – maybe combine a few. Anyway, thanks for the request. cheers, Fred

          Reply
  3. Israel says

    November 12, 2020 at 10:56 AM

    From your experience, which one out of four risk mitigation strategy would you consider the best?

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      November 12, 2020 at 11:42 AM

      Hi Israel,

      I would always look for a way to avoid the risk when possible – Avoidance. Design out the possibility of the risk occurring or imposing unwanted consequences.

      A risk avoided is a risk conquered.

      cheers,

      Fred

      Reply
  4. Simson says

    April 13, 2021 at 9:35 PM

    Are there some more risks mitigation strategies in addition to the four strategies above?

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      April 14, 2021 at 8:52 AM

      Most likely there are – these are the ones I am familiar with. If anyone knows of other strategies, please chime in.

      cheers,

      Fred

      Reply
      • Dinesh says

        April 24, 2021 at 9:51 AM

        Other mitigation risks are hedge, risk buffer, share, find alternatives, DD etc..

        These are other risk that I am aware about.
        If you find content for any of them please email me the examples, i would be highly obliged
        Dinesh
        dv.tcs009@gmail.com

        Reply
        • Fred Schenkelberg says

          April 24, 2021 at 10:03 AM

          Thanks Dinesh – good list, and what is DD? does that stand for something?

          cheers,

          Fred

          Reply
  5. Dinesh says

    April 24, 2021 at 9:48 AM

    The content is very useful and easy to understand on risk mitigation.
    Thanks for the content.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.