Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • CMMSradio
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Asset Performance
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Hardware Product Develoment Lifecycle
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
      • FMEA Introduction
      • AIAG & VDA FMEA Methodology
    • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction
      • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Home » Articles » on Maintenance Reliability » Plant Maintenance » The Cost of Maintenance Destroys Your Capital Investment Returns

by Mike Sondalini 2 Comments

The Cost of Maintenance Destroys Your Capital Investment Returns

The Cost of Maintenance Destroys Your Capital Investment Returns

The cost of maintenance destroys your capital investment returns.

When equipment is first selected the buyer has the choice to buy for quality and long trouble-free operating life or to buy based on least cost. The least cost choice will result in high maintenance and operating expense for the life of the equipment.

When net present value cost of maintenance for cheap equipment is calculated in today’s dollars investors will discover that a large part of their capital will never earn them income but will be spent on maintenance and repair.

Keywords: replacement asset value, internal rate of return, opportunity cost 

Overview

The cost of maintenance can send your business broke. If your annual maintenance cost is higher than 5% of your asset value you are in trouble.

The total maintenance cost depends on the quality of the equipment you use and how much maintenance it requires.

The smart business owner buys equipment that needs little maintenance and ensures that the business’ design, maintenance, operating and procurement policies and practices all work toward having long-running, long-lived, never-failing plant.

Where the Losses Arise

It is clear to any long-serving maintenance manager that the only policy that should be adopted in a business is to buy equipment that does not fail.

The cost of maintaining equipment is wasted money. Unfortunately, we are forced to live within the limits of our current technologies, and for the moment, that means we only have the option of buying equipment with parts and designs that require maintenance.

That being the case, it is smart business to look at getting equipment with a design that prevents failure and that requires little and simple maintenance.

In the chemical manufacturing industry, the world best practice maintenance costs are 1.8% to 2.0% of the replacement value of the plant (the original asset value incremented annually for inflation). In the worst operations, maintenance costs more than 5% of the asset replacement value per year. 5% represents $50,000 per year for every $1,000,000 of asset replacement value.

These organizations are unnecessarily wasting $30,000 a year for every $1,000,000 of asset value.

The effect of compounding the maintenance cost

Taken as an annual $30,000 sum and compounded over a twenty-year life at the business’ average weighted cost of capital (12% for the sake of the calculation) the total opportunity cost involved is $2,162,000.

This is money not earned over 20 years because it was spent on unnecessary repairs. If the $30,000 annual cost difference between 2% and 5% over 20 years were brought back to its present worth today (at the 12% rate) it would equal $224,000. This is $224,000 out of every $1,000,000 of asset replacement value not earning a 12% return because of poor equipment, poor design, poor maintenance and poor operating practices.

It is clearly a huge penalty for a business to pay because of inadequate design, purchasing, operating and maintenance policies and practices. The figures are even more astounding when put into tabular form on Table No. 1.

For each 1% of replacement asset value spent annually on maintenance over a 20-year period, $75,000 of every $1,000,000 of original capital will not return any dividend on the investment.

The best practice to adopt

You may have come across these words of advice before –

“It is unwise to pay too much, but it is worse to pay too little. When you pay too much, you lose a little money. When you pay too little, you sometimes lose everything, because the thing you bought was incapable of doing the thing you bought it to do. The common law of business balance prohibits paying too little and getting a lot – it cannot be done! So if you deal with the lowest bidder, it is wise to add something for the risk you run. And if you do that, you will have enough to pay for something better.” John Ruskin. 1819 –1900, English author, architect, and economist.

“There is hardly anything in this world that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and the people who consider price only are this man’s lawful prey.” John Ruskin.

“You need to be rich to buy cheap products. Why? Because you eventually have to buy twice to have the job done properly.” Anon.

The best advice to every businessman is to only buy equipment that costs little or nothing to maintain. In fact, they should be demanding that original equipment manufacturers develop new technologies for their equipment to get maintenance cost down to nothing.

With less maintenance, machinery is available to operate for longer.

This translates into less spare parts, a smaller store, fewer operators, maintainers and fewer managers. The benefits gained from having reliable, long-lived plant extend well beyond just having lower maintenance costs.

If you are an investor then you may be better rewarded by putting your money into assets that require very little maintenance or into intellectual businesses that have few current assets.

If your business involves using equipment then it is critical that you buy top quality equipment requiring little maintenance.

Furthermore, you must employ able people and train them to become the best, most competent plant operators and maintainers you can possibly afford so that they can keep the plant running well and you are not wasting as much of your business’ capital money on maintenance.


 

Mike Sondalini
Editor
Feed Forward Publications
Website – trade-school.education

Annual Maintenance Cost as % of Asset Replacement ValueCurrent Replacement Value of Asset in $Annual Maintenance as Cost of Replacement Asset Value in $ without Inflation EffectLength of Asset Life in YearsWeighted Average Cost of Capital %Accumulated Value of 20 Years Maintenance Opportunity Cost at Average Weighted Cost of Capital RatePresent Value of 20 Years Maintenance Opportunity Cost at Weighted Average Cost of Capital Rate without Inflation Effect
1100000010000201272052474694
210000002000020121441049149389
310000003000020122161573224083
410000004000020122882098298778
510000005000020123602622373472
610000006000020124323147448167

Table No. 1. The Net Present Value of the Cost of Maintenance

 

If you found this interesting, you may like the ebook Centrifugal Pump Problems & Answers.

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, Plant Maintenance

About Mike Sondalini

In engineering and maintenance since 1974, Mike’s career extends across original equipment manufacturing, beverage processing and packaging, steel fabrication, chemical processing and manufacturing, quality management, project management, enterprise asset management, plant and equipment maintenance, and maintenance training. His specialty is helping companies build highly effective operational risk management processes, develop enterprise asset management systems for ultra-high reliable assets, and instil the precision maintenance skills needed for world class equipment reliability.

« Material Selection and Reliability
In a World of “Black Swans”, How Do You Know Which One to Worry About »

Comments

  1. Alex Ponomarew says

    August 26, 2021 at 5:33 AM

    Mike
    We might be on the same page when we publish or post about awareness of price vs performance.

    You have used some quotes that I would I like post to my Linkedin groups. Permission to use?

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      August 26, 2021 at 6:45 AM

      Hi Alex,

      You may excerpt quotes if you provide Mike full attribution and link back to the article

      cheers,

      Fred

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by
Mike Sondalini
in the
Plant Maintenance series.

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • How to Get from Idea to Scale
  • Two Ways to Think and Talk about Reliability
  • Reliability Allocation
  • Good Project Management Leadership Will Reduce Project Risk
  • Using Condition Monitoring as a Reliability Improvement Strategy

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

Book the Course with John
  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.
This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.