Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
    • Reliability Engineering Management DRAFT
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Robert (Bob) J. Latino Leave a Comment

Don’t Healthcare Workers Fatigue Like Anyone Else?

Don’t Healthcare Workers Fatigue Like Anyone Else?

Fatigue regulations and guidelines have been long established in aviation, transportation and the nuclear industries (just to name a few). The science is solid supporting the correlation between human fatigue, and poor decision-making/poor responsiveness.

So why aren’t such fatigue regulations required in healthcare as a matter of standard like in other industries? Is there something different about the physiology and/or anatomy of a healthcare worker versus a pilot, truck/bus driver or nuclear operator?

In the other industries where fatigue standards have been long standing, they are in industries that protect human life (passengers and communities). In healthcare, their product in essentially helping ensure ‘quality of life’ for us all. That is a pretty important responsibility…surely us patients think so!

So why isn’t this industry leading in terms of applying such science-based rules for preventing the effects of fatigue and rather lagging behind other industries with not as great a moral responsibility (i.e. – Do No Harm)?

When I have asked this question of some healthcare professionals, some have responded:

1. “medical school teaches students how to compensate for fatigue and therefore it is not as much a factor” (if that is the case, they should teach other industries how to do this. However, the error rate in healthcare would not support the fact that this strategy is working).

2. Another responded to me this way, “Would you rather have a doctor who is tired but very familiar with your case, OR depend on a rested doctor to accurately convey all about your case info to the next shift?” To me this should not be an ‘OR’ statement because as a patient, I expect a well rested doctor capable of making decisions in my best interest AND to transfer all of that information to the next shift to ensure continuity of care. I should not have to pick one or the other.

This has been a long debated issue that is just resurfacing again. It would be interesting to hear from both sides of the aisle here on this very important issue that affects us all.

I do want to end with, in my 20 years in the healthcare space, the overwhelming predominance of caregivers are exceptionally well-intentioned in their efforts on our behalf. But in many situations, their deficient organizational systems (i.e. – policies, procedures, training, communication systems, purchasing habits, etc.) fail them in their efforts to do what is right. I have the utmost respect for those in the healthcare industry…those who have chosen a profession to help others!

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2015/02/01/nurse-group-seeks-reduction-in-long-hours-to-reduce-fatigue/22103201/

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, The RCA

« One Does Not Simply Do Reliability
Beware of the Type III Error »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

logo for The RCA article series image of BobArticle by Robert (Bob) J. Latino
CEO of Reliability Center, Inc.

in the The RCA article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • History Repeats Itself: Buncefield, Puerto Rico, Jaipur
  • How Reliability Engineers Can Improve Their Communication in Information Sessions
  • FMEA Detection Risk: Insights and Advices
  • How to Structure Your ERM System
  • Rate of Occurrence of Failure

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.