Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • About
    • Adam Bahret
    • Alex Williams
    • Andre Kleyner
    • Anne Meixner
    • Arthur Hart
    • Ash Norton
    • Carl Carlson
    • Chris Jackson
    • Chris Stapelmann
    • Dennis Craggs
    • Dev Raheja
    • Doug Lehr
    • Doug Plucknette
    • Fred Schenkelberg
    • George Williams
    • Gina Tabasso
    • Greg Hutchins
    • James Kovacevic
    • James Reyes-Picknell
    • Joe Anderson
    • John Paschkewitz
    • Katie Switzer
    • Kevin Stewart
    • Kirk Gray
    • Les Warrington
    • Mike Konrad
    • Mike Sondalini
    • Nancy Regan
    • Perry Parendo
    • Philip Sage
    • Ray Harkins
    • Rob Allen
    • Robert (Bob) J. Latino
    • Robert Kalwarowsky
    • Ryan Chan
    • Shane Turcott
    • Steven Wachs
    • Tim Rodgers
    • Usman Mustafa Syed
  • Reliability.fm
    • Dare to Know
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Masterminds in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Plant Maintenance
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The RCA
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside FMEA
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
      • Reliability Reflections
  • eBooks
    • Reliability Engineering Management DRAFT
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Groups
    • Reliability Integration
    • Mastermind
    • Study Groups
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) Online Course
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • 5-day Reliability Green Belt ® Live Course
    • 5-day Reliability Black Belt ® Live Course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Don’t show this message again.

Cookies

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.

by Robert Allen Leave a Comment

Why Excellence May Not Be the Best

Why Excellence May Not Be the Best

When considering a business process improvement (or some other) initiative, we also want to communicate to motivate the right behaviors.  However, initiatives often seem to use buzzwords or use titles familiar to employees that have seen such initiatives come and go (the key word being “go”).

A few common initiative titles include:

  • Business Excellence (BusEx)
  • Operational Excellence (OpEx)
  • Technical Excellence
  • Continuous Improvement (CI)
  • Lean Sigma

How does it feel when reading this list?  Perhaps employees feel as though an initiative is required because they are not already excellent, or not good enough and therefore need to improve.  Perhaps it’s an initiative with which they are familiar that failed or was discontinued.  Is there a certain amount of cynicism associated with the initiative, or is it something employees are excited about?

Operational Excellence (for example) may, in fact, be the right fit for your organization.  However, it’s worth considering other words that might better represent leaderships strategy, vision and purpose, the organizational structure, and motivates the right behaviors.

One alternative is to emphasize productivity.   The word “productivity” is less ambiguous, simply stated and immediately recognizable in executive communications.  Productivity can be improved with a department entitled “Productivity & Performance”.  Productivity is also something all employees should want: a more productive employee is more valuable, regardless of their place of employment.  Productivity therefore ties to leaderships vision and purpose, the organizational structure, and motivates the right behaviors.

Other potential initiative titles might include:

  • Process Improvement…fits with People, Processes and Product (and a bit more specific than the never-ending continuous improvement).
  • Lean Manufacturing…most of us want to be lean 🙂
  • Lean Project Management
  • Lean Product Development
  • Tools & Methods (an opportunity to learn new tools and ways of doing things)
  • Other keywords:  high performance, agile, optimization, value, etc…

In summary, rather than simply carrying-forward a ‘traditional’ approach to an initiative, it’s worth considering employees as customers of the initiatives and using words that might work better.

Filed Under: Articles, on Leadership & Career, Product Development and Process Improvement Tagged With: agile product development, Critical to Quality, customer value, Design for Six Sigma, lean manufacturing, Lean Project Management, New Product Development, PLC process, product development, product life cycle, Project Management, six sigma

« Program Management with Perrys Solutions
The 5 ‘S’ Method of Operation  »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Rob Allen
in the Product Development and Process Improvement series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member. It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Join PD&PI

Stay in touch with Rob and improve your product and processes.

You will receive occasional emails with announcements, recent articles, and maybe a question or two.

Your email is safe and the opt-in here provides your permission to send messages concerning the PD&PI article list plus special announcements. Privacy Policy

Recent Posts

  • Establishing Fixed Time Maintenance Intervals
  • Risk-Based Analysis of Random Variables
  • The Basics of PM Programs
  • The Power of a Sample
  • Taking Care of Our Equipment Requires More than just Proactive Maintenance

© 2021 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy