Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
    • Reliability Engineering Management DRAFT
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Larry George Leave a Comment

Firestone Tire Reliability Circa Year 2000

Firestone Tire Reliability Circa Year 2000

My wife and I were in Firestone-Walker Brewery (Buellton, California) after Solvang Danish Days. (That’s me playing in the Solvang Village band.) My wife was comparing an Adam Firestone photo on the wall with a man at a table. I was admiring a woman seated near the bar with balletic posture. The balletic woman picked up a pizza and delivered it to the man and sat with him. My wife went over and asked the man if he was Adam Firestone? He was, with his sister Polly. While my wife chatted with them, I did not engage, because I was responsible for FORD recalling the Firestone tire sizes that Firestone did NOT recall.

Some History

August 2, 2000: Firestone recalled “…all ATX and ATXII tires of the P235/75R15 size (Ford Explorer) manufactured since 1991 and all Wilderness AT tires of that same size manufactured at Firestone’s Decatur, Illinois, plant.”

August 30, 2000: NHTSA recommended that Firestone expand the recall. Firestone declined. Investigation continued.

February 2, 2001: NHTSA was aware of 174 fatalities “alleged to be related to a tire failure.”

November 2000: Congress passed the TREAD Act [Public Law 106-414, HR 5164], requiring that NHTSA obtain and use insurance company reports. NHTSA asked insurance companies for “full VIN, personal identifiers, and specific crash information.” The insurance companies replied that providing such information would violate personal privacy. Stalemate.

2001: A friend survived a Firestone tire blowout in her Ford Bronco on highway 5 at 75 mph. I suspected the design defect that caused tire failures extended to other tire sizes. My tire reliability estimates showed that Firestone and Ford could have suspected tire problems in 1997. I shared my reliability estimates with a Ford statistician working on the Firestone tire problems.

May 2002: FORD recalled the other Firestone tire sizes!

What Data are Necessary?

The NHTSA Firestone complaints database included the tire failure date and the vehicle make, model, year, and personal identification (plus typos). Their database also indicated whether the tire was original equipment. Reliability analysis is easy, if you have life data.

I proposed that NHTSA provide early warning of automotive defects by using statistics that DO NOT require vehicle and personal identification. Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) require statistically sufficient data to estimate age-specific field reliability, expected complaints, and upper prediction limits. That data is vehicle counts, by year, make, model, and complaint counts by type. NHTSA’s TREAD Act insurance study found that insurance companies have such data.

Maximum likelihood and least squares nonparametric reliability estimates are available, from vehicle sales and complaints. Age-specific reliability estimates help detect exceptions, process shifts, improvements, or deteriorations attributable to calendar intervals. They help separate the effects of vehicle, make, model, tire type and size, or plant.

Broom Charts

Imagine working for Firestone in the 1990s. In 1991 you would have had data from 1991; in 1992, you would have had data from 1992; etc. Figure 1 shows Kaplan-Meier reliability estimates, computed each year through 2000, aka a “broom chart”. Ward’s supplies vehicle counts and the NHTSA published annual complaint counts, for OEM tires.

Figure 1. Broom chart of tire reliability estimates from ships and complaints shows decreasing reliability. Longer lines are from older data.

Imagine working for Ford in the 1990s. You would have known Ford sales and repairs by VIN and symptom, which yield life data for the estimates in figure 1. But suppose some repairs were tire related problems? You could have made the reliability estimates in figure 2, from Ford sales and NHTSA complaints, by model (tire size). Figure 2 shows the least squares estimator for renewal processes [Chapter 6 of “Random-Tandem Queues…”]. Ask Fred or pstlarry@yahoo.com if you want software in workbook or R-Script.

Figure 2. Age-specific reliability estimates by model from sales and complaints data in year 2001.

Manage Risk?

Estimate age-specific field reliability by calendar intervals, even if you don’t have life data: read the next Accendo Weekly Update for explanation. Make actuarial forecasts of failures and estimate upper prediction limits (UCL) as with control charts. If failures in some calendar interval exceed the UCL, take a sample, estimate reliability from age-at-failure data, search for root causes, and evaluate process improvements. Then revise forecasts, estimate risk under alternatives, act accordingly, and verify the improvements.

References

“Could Firestone and Ford Have Known?” ERI News, April 2001, Equipment Reliability Institute and SRE Lambda Notes, Vol. 34, Dec. 2001, pp 28-34

NHTSA TREAD Act Section 3(d) Insurance Study, http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/problems/studies/insurance/insreport4final.htm

Ward’s Automotive Yearbook, publication of wardcc.com

“Random-Tandem Queues and Reliability Estimation, Without Life Data,” https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxmaWVsZHJlbGlhYmlsaXR5fGd4OjU1NTQwNTJhNDkxNWJlNGM

Filed Under: Articles, on Tools & Techniques, Progress in Field Reliability?

« How do I set up my reliability engineering career?
The Biggest Problem to Your Reliability Program Is… »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Larry George
in the Progress in Field Reliability? article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • History Repeats Itself: Buncefield, Puerto Rico, Jaipur
  • How Reliability Engineers Can Improve Their Communication in Information Sessions
  • FMEA Detection Risk: Insights and Advices
  • How to Structure Your ERM System
  • Rate of Occurrence of Failure

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.