Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

First Five Questions

First Five Questions

ASQ has posted sample exams for the past 10 or so years for the certifications. The CRE one is from 2009 and has questions used on previous exams. You can find a copy here or here.

This post has the first 5 questions with the answers explained. This is how I think or work through the problem to select an answer. Please comment if you have a different approach, especially if it would save time.

1.  Which of the following methods will most improve the reliability of a product?

(A) Reducing confidence levels

(B) Reducing variation

(C) Increasing sample size

(D) Increasing test time

Answer

The key word is most, thus we should look for the most effective, most useful, etc. method. There may be more than one correct answer so use your judgment to determine the answer that provides the best or most improvement to product reliability.

A, C, and D all involve prediction or testing. Confidence levels deal with the estimate of reliability which is unknown and doesn’t change the reliability. Increasing sample size permits a better estimate of the population, yet doesn’t change the actual product reliability. And, increasing test time may increase the testing results ability to highlight either the failure modes or time to failure, yet doesn’t change the product reliability directly.

B, reducing variability, creates a product that is more robust or further from specification limits. It is the only answer that changes the product not our estimate of its reliability. Products that are weaker or closer to specifications are more likely to fail. Reducing variability creates more products that are within specification or well away from limits, thus able to survive the expected stresses longer.

B is the correct answer.

Reference: Grant, Eugene L., and Richard S. Leavenworth, Statistical Quality Control, 7th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., 1996, pp. 686-687. ISBN 0071142487


2.  Which of the following methods can be used to quantitatively identify items that are risk-critical?

(A) Design review

(B) Fault-tree analysis

(C) Concurrent engineering

(D) Human reliability analysis

Answer

I’m focused on finding a method that is quantitative (numbers) and associated with risk or probability.

D Human reliability analysis looks at one of the aspects of product reliability and does not consider hardware, software or system reliability. While the analysis can provide quantitative results is does not consider the overall product.

A is a review process and may create a list of important elements to consider or address int eh design, It is generally not quantitative. C is a method of design practice and not associated with risk assessment.

B FTA is a reliability modeling method and quantitatively permits one to determine the highest risks to product reliability.

B is the correct answer.

Reference: Gryna, Frank M., Richard C.H. Chua, and Joseph A. DeFeo, Juran’s Quality Planning and Analysis for Enterprise Quality, 5th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007, p. 338


3.  At the design stage of a product, the first safety focus should be on which of the following?

(A) Regulatory requirements

(B) Production tools

(C) Controls and equipment

(D) End-user applications

Answer

‘Design’, ‘first’, and ‘safety’ are all key terms. ‘First’ indication that more than one answer may be correct and one is held as primary.

A regulatory requirement should never dominate the design as they often provide only a baseline criteria. Some regulatory requirements are safety related and have to be met and the design stage is appropriate, yet it probably isn’t the right ‘first’ answer.

B production tools and C controls and equipment refer to variation control during the production stage. Some consideration to these items should occur during design and may not be the ‘first’ concern.

D End-user applications is correct. Safety is about the end user and the safe use of the product under design. The customer’s safety should be held as a primary safety consideration in all stages including the design stage.

D is the correct answer.

Reference: Ireson, W. Grant, Clyde F. Coombs, Jr. and Richard Y. Moss, eds., Handbook of Reliability Engineering and Management, 2nd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill Professional, 1996, p. 9.3. ISBN 0070127506


4.   Which of the following statements is true about response surface methods?

(A) They can eliminate day-to-day variations in a manufacturing environment.

(B) They are more efficient than two-level factorial design techniques.

(C) They do not require technical considerations to implement the method.

(D) They determine how an output is affected by a set of variables over a specified region.

Answer

‘Response surface’ is a type of design of experiment method.

A is incorrect as the variation in any factory is going to occur. One of the aims of DOE is to make the product or process less responsive to this expected variation (robust).

B is incorrect as response surface experiments are generally less efficient needing more levels (at least three to map a plane for example) to map the plane when compared to a two-level design.

C is incorrect as all DOEs require technical considerations to implement. Understanding the factors likely to change the output, how to construct and measure the items, and making design or process changes all take considerable technical knowledge.

D provides a basic definition of a response surface DOE.

D is the correct answer.

Reference: Breyfogle, Forrest W. III, Statistical Methods for Testing, Development, and Manufacturing, New York: Wiley, 1992, p. 250. ISBN 0471540358


5.   Which of the following assumptions is true about degradation?

(A) It is inherent and irreversible.

(B) It is inherent and reversible.

(C) It is unacceptable and irreversible.

(D) It is unacceptable and reversible.

Answer

I like this kind of answers. Really in only two questions is degradation inherent or unacceptable. Then is it irreversible or reversible?

Degradation is the deterioration of performance. It could be light output slowing fading in intensity, or the wear of a brake pad reducing braking force. Degradation is generally unacceptable at some point, yet may also have a region of performance that is acceptable and still undergoing degradation. Inherent means it is part of the product or material or process. It is what happens during normal use. For this first comparison, I would select inherent as the better answer.

The second question is about irreversible or reversible? Reversible means the product or process ‘gets better’ sometimes. By definition, degradation is irreversible which permits us to model and predict the time to failure (transition from acceptable to unacceptable performance.

A is the correct answer. BoK III. B. 2.

Reference: Nelson, Wayne, Accelerated Testing, Statistical Models, Test Plans and Data Analyses, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1990, p. 523. ISBN 0471522775

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Prep, CRE Preparation Notes Tagged With: cre prep

« Reliability Goal Story
No Feedback »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.