Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Doug Lehr Leave a Comment

Frac Plug Reliability

Frac Plug Reliability

Frac plugs create a seal with the inner diameter of the casing. With the frac ball on seat in the frac plug, a check valve is formed in the casing which resists fracturing pressures up to 15,000 psi. Composite frac plugs use substantially composite components and rubber seals. Degradable frac plugs use components manufactured from magnesium (Mg) alloys.

Frac Plug set in casing, with frac ball on seat

A frac plug (FP) has three missions. The 1st is to resist fracturing pressure, the 2nd is to stay at its setting location until removed, and the 3nd is quick removal (~15 minutes). When compared to cast iron versions, composite versions are intrinsically quicker to remove. Quick removal for degradable versions means substantial deterioration within ~14 days of installation.

Most composite and degradable versions use a permanent packer configuration to achieve missions 1 and 2. Composite materials and magnesium alloys are used to achieve the removal mission. A large variety of thermoset materials are used for structural components, and both chopped fiber and continuous fiber reinforced materials are used. Some higher temperature versions use reinforced thermoplastic materials. The magnesium materials used in degradable products tend to be “designer alloys” and are highly customized to achieve strength and degradation targets.

But configuration and materials selection are only the start. It is difficult to model the response of these materials to combinations of pressure and temperature. Also, the response of components can change when manufactured at different suppliers, or when sources of resins and powders change. Thus, further de-risking through FMEA and laboratory tests is necessary to achieve high intrinsic reliability. See The Importance of Post-delivery Feedback.

High frac plug reliability is critical to unconventional completions because they ensure that expensive fracturing fluids go into the right perforations. Purchasing a plug with a claim of high reliability is a good start, but there is more to the selection process. As mentioned in The Plug and Perf Process, a frac plug is part of a system of PnP tools, the intrinsic reliability of which must be established by the OEM prior to installation. And high frac plug reliability is also possible only when wellbore cleanliness and low tortuosity are achieved. See Equipment Risk. A frac plug OEM can add reasonable debris tolerance to its product but cannot design it with tolerance for an infinite range of damaging wellbore conditions.

TRUTH: FP reliability is influenced by companion tools and the downhole environment.

This is the 2nd in a series of five articles on why Frac Plugs fail in Plug and Perf applications.

  1. The Plug and Perf Process
  2. Frac Plug Reliability
  3. Ballistic Setting Tools
  4. The Pump-In Process
  5. Well Tortuosity

Filed Under: Articles, Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications, on Risk & Safety

« Reliability … and why always asking ‘are we there yet’ doesn’t work
Root Cause Analysis: Investment or Expense? »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Doug Lehr, P.E., Founder and Principal, Integris Technology
in the Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Risk And Safety
  • Risk Prioritization in FMEA – a Summary
  • What Are Best Practices for Facilitating Qualitative Assessments?
  • So, What’s Still Wrong with Maintenance
  • Foundation of Great Project Outcomes – Structures

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.