Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
    • Reliability Engineering Management DRAFT
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Murphy’s Law and Reliability

Murphy’s Law and Reliability

It always seems there are more red lights when I’m running late.

This comment and others similar to it caught my attention lately. Is it just Murphy’s Law or something else?

There is an element of luck or chance in many events during our daily lives. The same is true when producing products and the resulting reliability. A lot has to go right for the product to work for the customer.

When something isn’t going as expected, we have a comparison that gains attention. If the lights are red more often, in theory, when I’m running late, maybe the lights are not turning red more often, it’s just that we notice.

For product development, it’s noticing the items that are going well and failing that matter. As reliability professionals, we need to continue to practice being aware of what is expected and what actually happens.

Setting expectations

Setting clear reliability goals is like establishing how long it takes to drive across town. We frame the expectation that permits us to make an ongoing comparison. If we are finding many defects and a high failure rate, or we start late for the drive across town, we have the opportunity to learn. We may be able to adjust and reduce field failures. For the drive across town, just relax, and you will get there when you get there — and next time allow a little more time.

We frame the expectation that permits us to make an ongoing comparison. If we are finding many defects and a high failure rate, or we start late for the drive across town, we have the opportunity to learn. We may be able to adjust and reduce field failures. For the drive across town, just relax, and you will get there when you get there — and next time allow a little more time.

It is the setting of expectations that let’s use do the comparison. Without goals, we do not know if the product is reliable enough or not. Without specific goals, most of the product testing produces results that are difficult to use effectively.

From component selection to warranty accrual we have to set expectations. Adjust along the way as needed.

Blinded by expectations

Another issue of how we perceive what we expect is not seeing what we do not expect.

This issue came to life for me as a bicycle rider. Riding along the coast one day, a car drifted into a pullout, forcing me off the road into the pullout and into a planting of bushes. They never saw me. They were looking for cars in the pull out (or the view) and certainly not me on a bicycle.

I’ve heard similar stories from other cyclists including motorcycles. When driving, we look for oncoming traffic — like other cars or trucks. A thin vehicle just doesn’t register. We don’t see it.

Setting reliability goals and ignoring information that doesn’t support the expected results can be done unconsciously — you just don’t see it.

Keep in mind that during development a failure is valuable. It provides evidence to support product reliability improvement.

When evaluating prototypes plan the testing to include not only the high risk or expected failures but also the surprises. This can be difficult and very valuable.

Summary

The world is full of chance events and encounters. We all make comparisons between what we observe and expect. Sometimes it becomes memorable and others we simply don’t see. Be conscious of these filters will help us be professional reliability engineers.

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability Tagged With: goals

« Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient
How Do You Stay Current? »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Fred Schenkelberg
in the Musings series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Terrorism Risk Insurance Act Exclusions: Gray Coverage Areas
  • Why Total Productive Maintenance Is The Answer To Reliability-Centered Culture
  • 17 Powerful Insights on Effective Communication Using FINESSE
  • Surprising Insights from Simple Run Charts
  • Risk is Round

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.