Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • About
    • Adam Bahret
    • Alex Williams
    • Andre Kleyner
    • Anne Meixner
    • Arthur Hart
    • Ash Norton
    • Carl Carlson
    • Chris Jackson
    • Chris Stapelmann
    • Dennis Craggs
    • Dev Raheja
    • Doug Lehr
    • Doug Plucknette
    • Fred Schenkelberg
    • George Williams
    • Gina Tabasso
    • Greg Hutchins
    • James Kovacevic
    • James Reyes-Picknell
    • Joe Anderson
    • John Paschkewitz
    • Katie Switzer
    • Kevin Stewart
    • Kirk Gray
    • Les Warrington
    • Mike Konrad
    • Mike Sondalini
    • Nancy Regan
    • Perry Parendo
    • Philip Sage
    • Ray Harkins
    • Rob Allen
    • Robert (Bob) J. Latino
    • Robert Kalwarowsky
    • Ryan Chan
    • Shane Turcott
    • Steven Wachs
    • Tim Rodgers
    • Usman Mustafa Syed
  • Reliability.fm
    • Dare to Know
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Masterminds in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Plant Maintenance
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The RCA
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside FMEA
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
      • Reliability Reflections
  • eBooks
    • Reliability Engineering Management DRAFT
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Groups
    • Reliability Integration
    • Mastermind
    • Study Groups
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) Online Course
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • 5-day Reliability Green Belt ® Live Course
    • 5-day Reliability Black Belt ® Live Course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Don’t show this message again.

Cookies

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.

by Kevin Stewart Leave a Comment

RCA – Show Me the Money

RCA – Show Me the Money

Follow the Money

Reliability initiatives are implemented to improve a company’s bottom line, period.  

Root cause analysis is one of the fastest ways I know to achieve this improvement.  My boss used to say “show me the money” because he realized that upper management was driven by ROI (Return on Investment) or ROC (Return on Capital). 

You can argue all you want on whether that is good or bad, but it is the way things are.

With a reliability initiative, this return is generated by reducing costs or improving output, or a combination of both.  This, in turn, is done by improving reliability by eliminating repetitive problems which extend the MTBF of failures or PM requirements, etc..

This allows you to spend less or make more product at a higher margin.

failureDefect elimination is the key

The process of eliminating failures is normally included as part of the overall process of Asset Management, which involves RCM, maintenance planning, scheduling, training and other tools.

I have always found it interesting that problem-solving or Root Cause Analysis is not listed as one of these tools.

This fact that the tool is reactive and not proactive may be the reason.  For another perspective on where and how this fits into the overall plan to improve reliability, you can review the article by Jason Tranter where he talks about improving reliability, and specifically about defect elimination, which is about the 4th paragraph from the end.

It is, without a doubt, in my opinion, the single most cost-effective tool with some of the highest ROI available.

This is not to say that the other tools are not important, or that they shouldn’t be pursued.  I personally was involved in setting up an entire system with all the bells and whistles, and programs at the facility I worked for at Alcoa.

This included planning and scheduling and even running the storeroom for a time.

Cost-effectiveness

Why do I believe it is the single most cost-effective tool?  It is inexpensive and can be implemented very quickly.  An employee can go to a public seminar for less than $2,000.

Even less if it is an onsite class.

From this 2-day class, you come away with the skills to analyze a problem and offer up effective solutions.  Theoretically within a week, you can easily make back the investment in the training.  I know this because I’ve done it and clients confirm it.

A simple example

While at Alcoa I required my students to do a project after the RCA class I taught, and if they didn’t, I threatened to send their plant manager an invoice for the public class cost of $1,595.

At the time my department paid for the materials and my boss sponsored my time so they actually paid $0 for the class.  Since they didn’t want to explain an additional cost to their plant, I had plenty of projects.

One project I remember was an analysis done by a student done the day after the class.

She grabbed a couple of people that attended the same class and did the analysis and proposed an effective solution that very next day.  The solution ended up only costing some maintenance time.  The savings were calculated at $400,000 based on real numbers.

To put it in perspective of potential outside participants, if the class and time to analyze and implement were $5,000 then the ROI would be 8,000% (savings/investment).

Imagine going to your management and telling them you just saved them $400,000 with a $5,000 investment!

Having been involved in the capital side of engineering for a while I know that many times they were ecstatic if the ROI was a whopping 50%!

Most plant management personnel will be extremely happy if you can show them this kind of data and will probably start to take notice of you and perhaps any programs you are trying to implement.

Show them the money.

Filed Under: Articles, Reliability Reflections

« When Smart TV Content Delivery Fails, Who is to Blame?
Annual Apex Ridge Seminar “Balancing Reliability with Product Development Goals” »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Kevin Stewart
in the Reliability Reflections series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member. It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • The Top 11 Signs of a Shallow Cause Analysis (SCA)
  • Is SPC Part of the Reliability Toolkit?
  • Continuous Training Strengthens your Asset Reliability Program
  • The Importance of a Learning Culture
  • Common Mistakes in a Capital Equipment Justification

© 2021 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy