Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg 2 Comments

Safety Factor

Safety Factor

Products that fail may create an unsafe situation.

For catastrophic failure mechanisms, the design team may consider establishing a safety factor or margin of safety policy. This provides the design team guidance as they size structures, select components, and evaluate performance and reliability.

A safety factor or margin are measures of the separation of the stress and strength for a specific failure mechanism. If something has a 2x safety factor it implies the element is twice as strong as the expected stress.

One way to define a safety factor is with the ration of the mean strength over the mean stress.
$$ \large\displaystyle \text{Safety Factor:}=\frac{{{\mu }_{x}}}{{{\mu }_{y}}}$$

Where μx is the average strength and μy is the average stress.

In some cases, the safety factor is defined as the minimum strength and the maximum stress.

The margin of safety is a similar definition

$$ \large\displaystyle \text{Margin of Safety:}=\frac{{{\mu }_{x}}-{{\mu }_{y}}}{{{\mu }_{y}}}$$

And provides a measure of the relative separation between stress and strength.

It is common practice for an organization to establish a guideline for various elements of a system. For an aircraft for example, the wing structural attachment may have a very high safety factor requirements, where the individual overhead light switch may have a relative small safety factor.

Setting safety factors impacts the cost, weight, and durability (for example) of a specific design. Setting an appropriate safety factor is a balance of business, customer, technology, uncertainty, variability, and liability. If the cost of failure (loss of a passenger plane, for example) is only one consideration then designs would be very conservative, robust, and expensive.

Of course, the cost of failure is balanced by the cost of construction, maintenance, and operation. The safety factor is a formal way to balance the chance of failure with the various costs. Part of the process may include setting a value on human life.

Your specific situation may not have governing safety factor guidelines, therefore work with your management team to establish appropriate guidelines.


Related:

Stress Strength Normal Assumption (article)

Discovery Testing (article)

Expectation and Moment Generating Functions (article)

 

 

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Reliability in Design and Development Tagged With: Derating methods and principles

« Why do Tolerance Analysis
2 Design Approaches to Creating a Reliable Product »

Comments

  1. tony guo says

    December 25, 2014 at 6:59 PM

    Seems the safety factor is similar to STRESS-STRENGTH ANALYSIS quoted from CRE handbook.
    Any difference between them?

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      December 25, 2014 at 8:59 PM

      Not really, except the safety factor lets you set how far apart the stress/strength should be for your situation. Stress/strength is just part of the equation. what’s the limit is the other.

      Cheers,

      Fred

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.