Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

Accendo Reliability

Reliability Engineering Professional Development
  • About
    • Adam Bahret
    • Andre Kleyner
    • Anne Meixner
    • Ash Norton
    • Carl Carlson
    • Chris Jackson
    • Chris Stapelmann
    • Dennis Craggs
    • Doug Plucknette
    • Fred Schenkelberg
    • Greg Hutchins
    • James Kovacevic
    • James Reyes-Picknell
    • John Paschkewitz
    • Katie Switzer
    • Kevin Stewart
    • Kirk Gray
    • Les Warrington
    • Mike Konrad
    • Mike Sondalini
    • Perry Parendo
    • Rob Allen
    • Robert Kalwarowsky
    • Steven Wachs
    • Tim Rodgers
  • Reliability.fm
    • Dare to Know
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Rob’s Reliability Project
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Plant Maintenance
      • RCM Blitz®
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Inside FMEA
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • Reliability Reflections
  • eBooks
    • Reliability Engineering Management DRAFT
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Groups
    • Reliability Integration
    • Mastermind
    • Study Groups
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • 5-day Reliability Green Belt ® Course
    • 5-day Reliability Black Belt ® Course
    • CRE Preparation Course
    • RAMwright Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Greg Hutchins Leave a Comment

Using IOT Intelligent Things to Monitor Risk in Real-time

Using IOT Intelligent Things to Monitor Risk in Real-time

Using IOT Intelligent Things to Monitor Risk in Real-time

Although in ISO 31000 monitoring risk is another of its key tenets, I again see little monitoring in most risk management systems. Periodic review, dashboards, heat maps, and KRI reports are all Review (a different ISO 31000 tenet) not monitoring. IoT technology can deliver real-time monitoring of risk for more than just physical environmental metrics.

To monitor means to supervise and continually check and critically observe. It means to determine the current status and to assess whether or not the required or expected performance levels are actually being achieved.

This is 5th in the series on the Top 10 Disruptive Technologies that will transform Risk Management in the 2020s.  This week I look at how IoT technology can be extended to deliver real-time monitoring of risk for more than just physical environmental metrics.

In my 2013 book “Mastering 21st Century Enterprise Risk Management” I suggested “horizon scanning” as a method monitoring risk and threats. With IoT we have the opportunity to extend this from a series of discrete observations into continuous real-time monitoring.  But let’s start with basics.

What is IoT – Intelligent Things?

The IoT acronym for Internet of Things, like most IT acronyms, is meaningless, so it’s more recently being referred to as Intelligent Things, which is both more meaningful and allows for its expansion outside its original classification (I will come to that shortly).

IoT technology is about collecting and processing continuous readings from wireless sensors embedded in operational equipment.  These tiny electronics devices transmit their readings; heat, weight, counters, chemical content, flow rates, etc., to a nearby computer, referred to as at the “edge”, which does some basic classification and consolidation and then uploads the data to the “cloud” where some specialist analytic system monitors those readings for anomalies.

The benefits of IoT are already well established in the fields of equipment maintenance and material processing (see Using Predictive Analytics in Risk Management). Deloitte found that predictive maintenance can reduce the time required to plan maintenance by 20–50 percent, increase equipment uptime and availability by 10–20 percent, and reduce overall maintenance costs by 5–10 percent.

Just as the advent of streaming video finally made watching movies online a reality, so streaming of data readings has produced a real paradigm shift in traditional metrics monitoring, including being able to make operational predictions up to 20 times earlier and with greater accuracy than traditional threshold-based monitoring systems.

Think about it.  What if we could achieve these sorts of improvement in risk management?

Monitoring Risk Management in Real Time

The real innovation from IoT is not from the hardware technology but from the software architecture built to process streaming IoT data.  Traditionally, data was collected, then processed and analyzed.  Like traditional risk management, it is historic and reactive.  Traditional Analytics used historical data to forecast what is likely to happen based on the historically set targets and thresholds, e.g. when a sensor hits a critical reading, a release valve would open to prevent overload. Processing and energy has already been expended (lost) and the cause still needs to be rectified.

IoT technology continuously streams data and processes it in real-time. Streaming Analytics attempt to forecast what data is coming. Instead of initiating controls in reaction to what has happened, IoT steaming aims to alter inputs or the system to maintain optimum performance conditions.  In an IoT system, inputs and processing are continually being adjusted base on the Streaming Analytics expectations of future readings.

This technology will have its profound and transforming effect on risk management.  When it migrates from being used to measure hardware environmental factors, to software-based algorithms monitoring system processes and characteristics we will be able to assess stresses and threats, both operational and behavioral.

In the 2020’s risk management will be heavily driven by Key Risk Indicator (KRI) metrics, and as such will be a prime target for monitoring by streaming analytics. In addition to obvious environmental monitoring, streaming metrics could be used to monitor in real-time staff stress and behavior, mistake (error) rates, satisfaction/complaint levels, process delays, etc.  All change over time and can be adjusted in-process to prevent issues arising.

In addition to existing general-purpose IoT platforms, such as Microsoft Azure IoT, IBM Watson IoT, or Amazon AWS IoT, with the advent of “Serverless Apps” (this technology exists now) we will see an explosion in mobile apps available from public App Stores to monitor every conceivable data flow, to which you will be able to subscribe and plug-in to your individual data needs.  We can then finally ditch the old reactive PDCA chestnut for the ROI method of process improvement and risk mitigation (see PDCA is NOT Best Practice).

Related articles you may be interested in

The previous articles in the series on the Top 10 Disruptive Technologies that will transform Risk Management in the 2020s:

  • Scenario Analysis – to provide operational management with possible paths and outcomes for risk events
  • Big Data – to provide the collateral for analytics & risk-based decision making
  • Neural Networking – to identify and map the drivers & influences on risk events 
  • Predictive Analytics–
    • Part 1 – 5 Primary Reasons for failure of Predictive Analytics projects

Part 2 – Using Predictive Analytics in Risk Management

Bio:

Greg Carroll 
- Founder & Technical Director, Fast Track Australia Pty Ltd.  Greg Carroll has 30 years’ experience addressing risk management systems in life-and-death environments like the Australian Department of Defence and the Victorian Infectious Diseases Laboratories among others. He has also worked for decades with top-tier multinationals like Motorola, Fosters, and Serco.

In 1981 he founded Fast Track (www.fasttrack365.com) which specializes in regulatory compliance and enterprise risk management for medium and large organizations. The company deploys enterprise-wide solutions for Quality, Risk, Environmental, OHS, Supplier, and Innovation Management.

His book “Mastering 21st Century Risk Management” is available from the www.fasttrack365.com website.

Filed Under: Articles, CERM® Risk Insights, on Risk & Safety

« The 5 Whys Method of Root Cause Analysis
What’s Stopping Your Organization from Improving? »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CERM® Risk Insights series Article by Greg Hutchins, Editor and noted guest authors

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member. It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • How Risk Informed, Decision Making Change a Life
  • Dust Bag Selection for Bag-Houses
  • Benefits of Comparing DMAIC with Project Management
  • The Rover Says Good Bye! :(
  • 100% Inspection

© 2019 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service