Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • CMMSradio
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Asset Performance
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Hero
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • The RCA
      • Communicating with FINESSE
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Hardware Product Develoment Lifecycle
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
      • FMEA Introduction
      • AIAG & VDA FMEA Methodology
    • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction
      • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Home » Articles » Validation Ensures the Right Product Is Designed & Developed

by Robert Allen Leave a Comment

Validation Ensures the Right Product Is Designed & Developed

Validation Ensures the Right Product Is Designed & Developed

Recall the overall objective of product development is to develop the ‘right product’ and to develop the “product right”.  In previous articles, we defined validation as a continuous process throughout product development to establish complete and correct requirements.  Consider the following illustration: 

Valid requirements represent the voice of the customer and acceptability of the product.  Product performance represents the “voice of” the design and process.  Product performance outside of spec limits result in defects and rework (it is not the right product to meet customer needs).

Let’s start with the easiest (and arguably, most likely) scenario:  A product requirement isn’t known with good specificity.  There is pressure to deliver the product to the customer and the customer expects a ‘fully qualified” product.  Some validation doesn’t start until testing in the customers environment.

Parameters without clear specification limits result in rejects.  Specification limits are clarified and escapes are prevented, however, defects and rework at the factory is now necessary.  A redesign or process improvement is needed.  Meanwhile, engineering has moved on to new products and may leave this activity up to operations or contract manufacturers to figure-out.  This is illustrated as follows, with the diagram now showing valid specification limits:

This messy scenario can be avoided with (1) valid requirements and specification limits before the design phase and (2) statistical design methodologies.  Here, validation starts with product requirements not a post-development phase-gate.  This also enables statistical design to consider optimizing tolerances to fall within the (valid) spec limits; designed according to design targets and process capability (mean and variability).

The diagram above illustrates an optimized design, verified according to valid requirements and an acceptably small percentage of defects.  It is the right product and the product is built right (designed and manufactured) with few defects.

Consider another example involving specification limits that are unnecessarily tight: 

With over-specified limits, we can still build the product “right” but with an unnecessarily expensive design or process.  This is the product and process cost aspect of requirements validation…recall our goal is to maximize customer value and minimize cost.   

Validation is a continuous process throughout product development to establish complete and correct requirements.

There should be no pretending the product is the right product, or maximizes customer value.  Starting validation early in the product development process mitigates this risk. The goal is to verify the design and process vs. valid requirements to the maximum extent possible.

Meanwhile, not every requirement can be considered complete and correct until testing by the customer, in the customers environment (especially where the customers environment is not duplicatable internally). This subset of requirements and testing represents risk and should therefore be minimized and mitigated accordingly. The goal remains the same for this subset of testing: clarify acceptability by the customer, in the customers environment, clarify the corresponding requirements and show that the product meets these requirements. 

A suggestion for the post-development product lifecycle phases might therefore comprise of the following:

 

Here we’re acknowledging validation testing as an activity that occurs during qualification and extends into “limited availability” where the product is provided to a few external customers environments.  Of course, if full validation is achieved in qualification, then there is less risk mitigated by limiting the availability of the product. Therefore, another benefit of robust validation is a shorter limited availability phase.

Using the “Qualification” terminology for the post-development phase should help prevent a mindset whereby validation isn’t viewed continuous process starting with requirements and throughout product development.

Conversely, if the “Validation” terminology is used as post-development phase, this may normalize a design-by-test and trial and error approach to product development. At the very least, starting validation with requirements would help minimize product development risk.

 

Filed Under: Articles, Product Development and Process Improvement

About Robert Allen

Robert Allen has over 25 years of professional experience in the areas of product development, process improvement and project management. Rob was a key contributor to numerous deployments of lean sigma and project management organizations, most notably with Honeywell and TE Connectivity. Included in Rob’s experience are multiple certifications and over 25 years of practice in the development, teaching, execution, and leadership of product lifecycle, lean product development, DFSS, lean six sigma, project management, systems engineering and supply chain.

« 12: Controlled Introduction. Part 3
RCM’s Hidden Power EXPOSED in Step 7 »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Rob Allen
in the Product Development and Process Improvement series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Join PD&PI

Your email is safe and the opt-in here provides your permission to send messages concerning the PD&PI article list plus special announcements. Privacy Policy

Recent Posts

  • 7 Proven Strategies to Protect Your Supply Chain
  • Progress in USAF Engine Logistics?
  • MTBF and Mean of Wearout Data
  • The Paradox of the Invisible Discipline
  • Historical Data

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

Book the Course with John
  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.
This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.