Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

Accendo Reliability

Reliability Engineering Professional Development
  • About
    • Adam Bahret
    • Alex Williams
    • Andre Kleyner
    • Anne Meixner
    • Ash Norton
    • Carl Carlson
    • Chris Jackson
    • Chris Stapelmann
    • Dennis Craggs
    • Dev Raheja
    • Doug Plucknette
    • Fred Schenkelberg
    • George Williams
    • Greg Hutchins
    • James Kovacevic
    • James Reyes-Picknell
    • Joe Anderson
    • John Paschkewitz
    • Katie Switzer
    • Kevin Stewart
    • Kirk Gray
    • Les Warrington
    • Mike Konrad
    • Mike Sondalini
    • Nancy Regan
    • Perry Parendo
    • Rob Allen
    • Robert Kalwarowsky
    • Steven Wachs
    • Tim Rodgers
    • Usman Mustafa Syed
  • Reliability.fm
    • Dare to Know
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Rob’s Reliability Project
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Masterminds in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Plant Maintenance
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside FMEA
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • Reliability Reflections
  • eBooks
    • Reliability Engineering Management DRAFT
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Groups
    • Reliability Integration
    • Mastermind
    • Study Groups
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • SPC-Process Capability Online Course
    • Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) Online Course
    • 5-day Reliability Green Belt ® Live Course
    • 5-day Reliability Black Belt ® Live Course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • RAMwright Live Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Don’t show this message again.

Cookies

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.

by Robert Allen Leave a Comment

What is Design for Assembly?

What is Design for Assembly?

In previous articles we covered design for six sigma and design for lean.  Now let’s take a look at Design for Assembly.  We’ll do this by following the Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) thought process, and add design for assembly (DFA) subtopics as follows:

Recall the objective of DFSS/DFA is to model and improve design performance before manufacturing the part, even before creating a prototype.  DFA therefore requires assembly performance to be assessed and modeled in a way that can determine (while still in the design phase), assembly performance enhancements.

We’ll use a typical master cylinder assembly as an example.  Note the exploded parts diagram helps to ‘make the process’ (or product) visible. Of course, 3D CAD systems are applicable here (as well as 3D printers, which could enable a physical trial of an assembly sub-process to be performed).  We’ll also identify the base component and part assembly sequence:

In this example, the base component (master cylinder housing) is placed in fixtures and parts are vertically installed.  The base component re-oriented and placed into different fixtures several times throughout the assembly process.

Like any process map, the objective is to make the process visible.  Also note the map can be used to estimate total assembly time/cost and to form a basis for a design for assembly P-FMEA (using a traditional P-Map).

With an exploded parts diagram, cross-sections and the assembly sequence, a list of design-for-assembly criteria can be applied, some of which is provided as follows:

  • Assemble on a suitable base
    • During assembly, is the base component oriented horizontally and lying ‘flat’?
    • Can special fixtures to assist in assembly be eliminated?
    • Are parts stacked vertically when installed into the base component?
  • Layered assembly
    • Does the design provide for easy insertion?
    • Does the design provide for disassembly (including maintainability & service environments)?
  • Mistake-proof and reduce assembly risk
    • Can a part be improperly installed (upside-down or backwards)?
    • Can a part be partially installed?
  • Simplify and reduce the number of fasteners
    • Eliminate screws, bolts, clips, rivets were possible
    • Use snaps, interlocks, slots and press fits were possible
    • Enable automatic tools to be used
  • Limit flexible parts
    • Eliminate wires, cables and belts were possible (or plug components together were possible)
  • Modular and multi-functional parts
    • Is the design of a component suitable for multiple applications?
    • Can a component be designed for perform multiple function?
  • Limit the number of parts
    • Is there a reason for dissimilar materials to be used for mating components? If not, can they be combined into a single component?
  • Design parts for feeding and insertion
    • Is tangling of components minimized?
    • Can automated equipment pick and place the part?

Of course, cross-functional team members can contribute to the criteria, the answers to the questions and the design thinking necessary to improve design for assembly.  Cost models should show reduced cost with the improved assembly process.  Also, when prototype parts are available we can validate our cost model and ensure the appropriate controls are in place which ensure robust assembly.

Finally, recall our overall DFSS/DFA objective to maximize customer value and minimize cost.  Therefore, design and assembly process optimization should also ensure customer critical-to-quality characteristics aren’t compromised.

Are YOU ready to maximize the value of your products?


Drop your email and name below!


Filed Under: Articles, on Leadership & Career, Product Development and Process Improvement Tagged With: agile product development, Critical to Quality, customer value, Design for Assembly, Design for Six Sigma, New Product Development, PLC process, product development, product life cycle, Project Management, six sigma

« TIG review
6 Secrets of Trouble-free Lubrication Success »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Rob Allen
in the Product Development and Process Improvement series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member. It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Stay in touch with Rob and improve your product and processes.

You will receive occasional emails with announcements, recent articles, and maybe a question or two.

Recent Posts

  • Golden Rules for Becoming a Leader in Reliability
  • IQ OQ PQ – Process Development
  • The Conscious Asset Framework – 3
  • Where is the Quality Fear Factor?
  • IoT’s Impact on CMMS Software

© 2019 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy