Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Ray Harkins Leave a Comment

Where Did All These Reliability Life Models Come From?

Where Did All These Reliability Life Models Come From?

Among students beginning their examination of reliability engineering, one question pops up repeatedly: Where did all these reliability life models come from? On one hand, reliability engineering is deeply entrenched in statistical models … Weibull, exponential, etc. But these models alone, do not fully explain the product life models. There is still a missing piece: the Physics of Failure (PoF).

PoF and reliability models are closely connected concepts, as they both relate to the ability of products, processes, and systems to perform their intended function consistently over time.

PoF refers to the scientific principles that govern the behavior of materials and systems under different conditions. It involves the study of how materials and systems fail, and the identification of the root causes of failure. The goal of PoF is to understand how and why materials and systems fail, and to develop strategies to prevent or mitigate these failures.

Reliability models, on the other hand, are mathematical models that are used to predict the reliability of products, processes, and systems over time. These models are based on statistical data and engineering principles, and are used to predict the likelihood of a failure occurring and the time it will take for a failure to occur. Reliability models help users identify and address potential reliability issues, and to develop strategies to improve the overall reliability of their products, processes, and systems.

The development of reliability models was made possible by PoF, as it provided the underlying scientific principles and data that were used to develop and validate these models. For example, data on the failure rates of different materials and components, which was obtained through the study of PoF, was used to develop and validate reliability models that predicted the likelihood of a failure occurring.

PoF also helped to inform the development of reliability models by providing insights into the root causes of failure. By understanding the underlying causes of failure, engineers were able to develop reliability models that accurately predicted the likelihood of a failure occurring, and to identify strategies to prevent or mitigate these failures.

One example of how PoF lead to the development of reliability models is the study of fatigue failure in metals. Fatigue failure is a common mode of failure in metals that occurs when a material is subjected to repeated cyclic loading, resulting in the development of cracks or fractures. PoF includes the study of the factors that contribute to fatigue failure, such as the stress range, the number of cycles, and the material properties.

This fatigue-related failure data was used to develop a general reliability model that could predict the likelihood of fatigue failure occurring in metals under differing conditions. For example, the Wohler curve, more commonly called the S-N curve, is a reliability model that is used to predict the number of cycles to failure for a given stress range in metals. 

The relationship between the stress and the corresponding cycles to failure are depicted mathematically as:

NSM = A

Where N is the cycles to failure, S is the applied stress, m is the slope of the curve on log-log paper, and A is a constant. Once an S-N curve has been established using actual fatigue test data, a design curve can then be constructed that is useful for predicting product life (in terms of cycles to failure) based on the stress level that the components are expected to encounter in the field.

Effectively, the development of reliability models was a response to the findings of PoF. Reliability models are used to predict the likelihood of failure of a material or structure based on various factors such as its design, the conditions it will be subjected to, and the type of load it will bear. These models then allow engineers and designers to assess the reliability of a material or structure, and to optimize a design of a material or structure for a specific application. By understanding the factors that contribute to the failure of a material or structure, engineers can design structures that are less likely to fail and are more durable over time. This can lead to significant cost savings and improved safety for products and structures that rely on these materials.

Author’s Biography:

Ray Harkins is the Quality and Technical Manager for Ohio Star Forge in Warren, Ohio. He earned his Master of Science from Rochester Institute of Technology and his Master of Business Administration from Youngstown State University. He also teaches manufacturing and business-related skills through the online learning platform, Udemy.

Click on the following coupon codes to receive substantial discounts on his courses, or reach out to him via LinkedIn at linkedin.com/in/ray-harkins or by email at the.mfg.acad@gmail.com.

Filed Under: Articles, on Tools & Techniques, The Manufacturing Academy

« Exploding Concrete
Building A Strong Reliability Culture For Your Maintenance Department »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Logo for The Manufacturing Acadamey headshot of RayArticle by Ray Harkins
in the The Manufacturing Academy article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • Risk Prioritization in FMEA – a Summary
  • What Are Best Practices for Facilitating Qualitative Assessments?
  • So, What’s Still Wrong with Maintenance
  • Foundation of Great Project Outcomes – Structures
  • What is the Difference Between Quality Assurance and Quality Control?

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.