Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

How do I Control a Process That Trends Naturally Due to Tool Wear?

How do I Control a Process That Trends Naturally Due to Tool Wear?

When processes trend naturally due to tool wear, traditional control charting methods fail.  The trend (which is expected) results in inappropriate “out-of-control” signals.  Control charts should detect unexpected changes in the process.  If the trend is expected, we do not want to be alerted to this trend.  If no accommodation is made for this trend, the chart will incorrectly produce “out-of-control” signals.  

The chart below illustrates a traditional X-bar chart on a trending process characteristic.

Setting up charts for trending data requires that we first understand and model the trend that naturally occurs.  That is, we need understand how our measurements change naturally over “time” where “time” is the variable that correlates with the trend (such as production minutes, hours, cycles, punches, parts produced, etc.).

If the trend is linear, simple linear regression may be used to develop a simple linear model to describe and predict the mean value over “time” (i.e. the trend).  Non-linear trends will require more complex models.  The graphic below illustrates a simple linear model fitted to the data.  The process mean is predicted as a function of “time” and only values that are acceptable should be included (values spanning the range from a new tool to a tool just prior to it being replaced).

The model is:  Mean = 7.668 + 0.1020*Time and it appears to fit quite well over the range of responses included.

Once an adequate model is developed to describe the mean value, control limits may be specified that are parallel to the process average line.  If we are charting averages, then typically the control limits will be parallel to the mean trend line at a distance of +/- 3 standard deviations.

A control chart that incorporates the trend is shown below.  Only averages that deviate more than the expected trend should be considered a signal of special cause variation.

Now, although the above chart is technically correct, it may be confusing since the control limits are not horizontal.  To resolve this, a control chart may be constructed on the differences between the actual sample average and the predicted average for each sample.  Note that the predicted average depends on the model we found earlier and the control limits must still reflect the within sample variation.  This chart is shown next.

In effect, we have simply rotated the trending chart and established the centerline at zero.  As mentioned earlier, non-linear trends may be modeled if necessary, but more complex models are required.

 

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

« FMEA Improves the Bottom Line
Electric Car Hidden Risk »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Steven Wachs, Integral Concepts
in the Integral Concepts article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Risk And Safety
  • Risk Prioritization in FMEA – a Summary
  • What Are Best Practices for Facilitating Qualitative Assessments?
  • So, What’s Still Wrong with Maintenance
  • Foundation of Great Project Outcomes – Structures

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.