Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
    • Reliability Engineering Management DRAFT
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Have good valve decontamination practices

Have good valve decontamination practices

This true story could have been a lot worse. A NB100 (4”) flanged plug valve was removed from a 98% sulphuric acid tank nozzle and returned to the supplier. When the valve was opened for inspection at the supplier’s workshop acid was sprayed over the repairman’s legs.

If 98% sulphuric acid lands on skin it immediately boils out the moisture in the skin and burns it. A review of the incident was conducted to learn from the accident and to put corrective measures into place.

The plug valve was a control valve in the acid line from a storage tank at the tank terminal. It moved in a stiff, jerking motion while in service and it was to be replaced and sent to the supplier’s workshop for inspection.

The terminal supervisor had arranged with a local subcontractor to meet on site at 7am in the morning to remove the plug valve. However the subcontractor had gone there at 5.30am and removed the plug valve, hosed down the outside and put it on a pallet without opening and flushing the plug cavity.

When the terminal supervisor arrived he saw the wet valve on the pallet in a closed position. He again hosed down the valve’s body but did not open the plug thinking that the subcontractor had already done this. The valve was not marked or tagged with any warning or information notice.

The valve was transported to the supplier’s workshop where it was left in the hot sun and then moved to the bench for stripping. The repairer, thinking the valve was safe to work on, opened the valve and acid under pressure squirted out onto his legs. He was taken to a doctor for treatment and was off work for some days.

There were a number of things that went wrong, as is often the case with an accident. There was no work order, there was no contact between operations and the subcontractor, the plug valve was not correctly decontaminated by water washing the internals and there was no decontamination tag showing the valve’s status.

The valve was opened in the mistaken belief that it was safe.

Recommendations

As a result the valve supplier adopted the following practice with regards decontaminating valves.

  • If valves came in without a decontamination notice attached, they were immediately tagged with a red danger tag and the owner of the valve contacted to find out the valve’s history.
  • When a valve came in and the decontamination notice indicated that the valve internals had been flushed out with water a yellow warning tag was attached. This meant that there might still be contaminants in the stem packing or behind valve seats.
  • Only after a valve was stripped and all parts washed was a green tag put on the valve indicating it was safe to work on.

Adopt a safe decontamination procedure when equipment in dangerous goods service is removed from the process.

Mike Sondalini – Maintenance Engineer


We (Accendo Reliability) published this article with the kind permission of Feed Forward Publishing, a subsidiary of BIN95.com

Web: trade-school.education
E-mail: info@trade-school.education

If you found this interesting you may like the ebook Process Control Essentials.

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, Plant Maintenance Tagged With: Valve

« How to Calculate Reliability Given 3 Different Distributions
Cascading Effects Ripple Through Organizations Ill Prepared to Deal with Them »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by
Mike Sondalini
in the
Plant Maintenance series articles provided courtesy of Feed Forward Publications and Lifetime Reliability Solutions.

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • How Reliability Engineers Can Improve Their Communication in Information Sessions
  • FMEA Detection Risk: Insights and Advices
  • How to Structure Your ERM System
  • Rate of Occurrence of Failure
  • What is Six Sigma and How is it Used in Quality Engineering?

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.