Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

How do I Implement SPC for Short Production Runs (Part I)?

How do I Implement SPC for Short Production Runs (Part I)?

Traditional SPC methods were developed to support high volume production and long production runs.  However, with the trend toward product specialization, product diversity, and flexible manufacturing, short production runs have become more common.  Applying SPC in the traditional manner presents challenges in short production runs, because by the time enough data is collected to establish valid control charts, the production run may be over!

An approach to deploying control charts with short production runs is to utilize charts of common characteristics across different products.  The chart pertains to the characteristic of interest (e.g. diameter) rather than for the diameter of a specific design.

A single chart can monitor the characteristic even though the nominal values (and specifications) are different.  This is accomplished by standardizing the data before plotting it.  A common chart that performs this is called the Deviations from Nominal (DNOM) chart.  Essentially, the value that is plotted is the difference between the part measurement and the nominal value (Note: The nominal value refers to the value that is typically specified on an engineering drawing as the desired value and is often halfway between the lower and upper specification limits).  Once the differences are computed, the control limits may be established in the normal way.

An Example:

A machining process produces in inner diameter of a check valve.  Depending on the type of unit produced, the nominal value of the diameter is 17.400 mm, 12.700 mm, or 10.500 mm.  Here, 10 samples (of size 3) are produced and measured for each part type.

For each unit measured, a deviation from nominal is calculated by subtracting the relevant nominal value from it.  For example, for a part that measures 17.408 mm, the deviation from nominal is:

17.408 – 17.400 = 0.008

For a part that measures 17.387 mm, the deviation from nominal is:

17.387 – 17.400 = -0.013

The following table illustrates the calculations for the Deviations from Nominal Chart.  Essentially, each measured data value is transformed by subtracting off the nominal value (xi = mi – Nominal).  The deviations are then used in the usual manner to construct the desired control chart (e.g. Xbar/S Charts, Xbar/R Charts).

Xbar and S charts constructed from the “Deviation from Nominal Data” follow.

Important Assumptions and Considerations

Several important assumptions and considerations apply to the DNOM approach and example above.

  1. It is assumed that the process standard deviation for the various part types are statistically the same.  Often parts with larger nominal measurements will also have larger standard deviations.  If the standard deviations are not the same across all part types, the above approach is invalid (and Standardized DNOM charts should be used).  Since the standard deviation is used to compute control limits, a single set of control limits would not apply if the variation differed across part types.  The solution to this potential problem is to further standardize the deviations before charting to account for the differences in variation.  The standardized DNOM charts and methods to test for equal variances will be covered in next month’s newsletter.
  1. The DNOM chart assumes that the same sample size is used for each part type.
  1. The DNOM chart is most intuitive when the nominal specification is the desired target for the process and the process average is “on target.”  However, often it is desirable to center the process at a value that is closer to one specification limit for cost reasons.  Furthermore, many characteristics have only a one-sided specification (e.g. strength, hardness, roundness) so no nominal value exists.  In these cases it may be desirable to change the “deviation from nominal” to either:
    1. Deviation from Target (where there is a strong desire to keep the process at the target value)
    1. Deviation from Historical Average (where we are mainly looking to detect process changes from the historical mean for that specific product type).

Summary

This article explains the use of DNOM charts, which may be used to monitor process characteristics over time even when the units being controlled have varying nominal values.  When the process variability differs significantly by part type, Standardized DNOM charts should be utilized and these will be described in Part II of this article.

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

« Tips for Examining Rolling Element Bearings: Prepping for a Root Cause Analysis
Renewal Process Estimation, Without Life Data »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Steven Wachs, Integral Concepts
in the Integral Concepts article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Self-Discipline Part 1
  • Is Safety Training Helpful?
  • FINESSE Facilitation: What Are Best Practices for Qualitative Assessment Analysis?
  • ISO 9001 Context and in the Real World, What do we do?
  • The Galvanic Corrosion Piping Trap!

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.