Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Kevin Stewart 2 Comments

Introduction to the Essential Characteristics of an RCA Program

Introduction to the Essential Characteristics of an RCA Program

This is the first in a nine-part series of articles. This first one will lay out what I think are essential characteristics of an RCA program. The other articles will follow up on each of the items in some detail.

What does it take to implement a Root Cause Analysis program or initiative? How do you insure it continues? Who needs to be involved? These are all important questions, and over the years, I have had the opportunity to think about them and evaluate what works and what doesn’t. Each organization has its own culture, desires, drive or other personality traits which may require the adjustment of these characteristics, but I believe they are all required in some form or another. I have listed them here for you to ponder and perhaps relate to programs that you may have seen succeed or fail at your facilities. So, what are these characteristics?

Characteristics

  • A plan to provide resources that is complete with a program champion and trained investigators
  • A sponsor, or program champion, who is involved and committed in the process
  • Establishment of clear trigger mechanisms to clarify exactly what will be investigated
  • Establishment of clear protocols for the collection and preservation of information and evidence
  • Establishment of a standard reporting process to provide communication, further analysis, and the cost savings achieved
  • Establishment of a tracking system that ensures items are not lost and which drives the action items to completion
  • A process to review the investigations for common causes, possible improvement opportunities, and missed opportunities
  • A process to track and report the value to the stakeholders of the RCA program

Root Cause Analysis is one program that can be initiated through what I would call a back door. I know this because I did it. This involves someone taking a class and liking it and the value it brings, and then using it in the plant to provide value. This is almost always a good thing, but sometimes the other leg work is not done which can lead to problems down the road. These problems end up being many of the characteristics that are mentioned above.

Where did they come from?

In my job, I had the opportunity to use the Apollo Root Cause Analysis process for about 12 years. Then, I taught the same process to many organizations over the next 14 years. Over this time I have observed issues and asked why. The results of these observations and questions were the formulation of the characteristics that are listed above which I believe are necessary for success.

Cast in Concrete?

These characteristics also must be taken as guidelines. This means that the order can be adjusted, and each one needs to be thought through and integrated with the corporate/plant culture that exists. I will describe each characteristic in more detail so that readers can adopt, adapt, or ignore them based on the understanding that they get from each discussion.

Call to action

So, please join me over the next weeks as I delve deeper into each of these characteristics. I especially look forward to getting your input and comments about these and any other characteristics you may believe might be missing.
Perhaps you already see something that is missing or don’t understand in the list. If you don’t want to wait, send me a comment, and let’s get a discussion going.

  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.

Filed Under: Articles, on Tools & Techniques, Reliability Reflections Tagged With: program, Rca, Root Cause Analysis

« Quantify Your Improvements with Maintenance Planning & Scheduling
Equipment Identification Tags Save Time »

Comments

  1. Ang Chee Khang says

    August 27, 2017 at 7:26 PM

    Hello Kelvin
    Thank you for sharing the knowledge.
    I am presently developing the RCA framework for my organization.

    The key elements you mentioned are exactly the areas I am going to emphasize.

    Hoping to learn more from you new next few weeks

    Thank you

    Reply
    • Kevin stewart says

      August 27, 2017 at 9:13 PM

      Your very welcome. I will be getting the other elements out soon. Let me know if you need any clarification

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Kevin Stewart
in the Reliability Reflections series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Risk Prioritization in FMEA – a Summary
  • What Are Best Practices for Facilitating Qualitative Assessments?
  • So, What’s Still Wrong with Maintenance
  • Foundation of Great Project Outcomes – Structures
  • What is the Difference Between Quality Assurance and Quality Control?

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.