Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • About
    • Adam Bahret
    • Alex Williams
    • Andre Kleyner
    • Anne Meixner
    • Arthur Hart
    • Ash Norton
    • Carl Carlson
    • Chris Jackson
    • Chris Stapelmann
    • Dennis Craggs
    • Dev Raheja
    • Doug Lehr
    • Doug Plucknette
    • Fred Schenkelberg
    • George Williams
    • Gina Tabasso
    • Greg Hutchins
    • James Kovacevic
    • James Reyes-Picknell
    • Joe Anderson
    • John Paschkewitz
    • Katie Switzer
    • Kevin Stewart
    • Kirk Gray
    • Les Warrington
    • Mike Konrad
    • Mike Sondalini
    • Nancy Regan
    • Perry Parendo
    • Philip Sage
    • Ray Harkins
    • Rob Allen
    • Robert (Bob) J. Latino
    • Robert Kalwarowsky
    • Ryan Chan
    • Shane Turcott
    • Steven Wachs
    • Tim Rodgers
    • Usman Mustafa Syed
  • Reliability.fm
    • Dare to Know
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Masterminds in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Plant Maintenance
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The RCA
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
      • Reliability Reflections
  • eBooks
    • Reliability Engineering Management DRAFT
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Groups
    • Reliability Integration
    • Mastermind
    • Study Groups
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) Online Course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • 5-day Reliability Green Belt ® Live Course
    • 5-day Reliability Black Belt ® Live Course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Don’t show this message again.

Cookies

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.

by Ray Harkins 2 Comments

The Net Present Value Method: Measuring the True Value of an Investment

The Net Present Value Method: Measuring the True Value of an Investment

In the previous three articles, we’ve examined the Break-even Analysis and Pay-back Period methods (Part 1 and Part 2) as means of evaluating capital investments. While these back-of-the-napkin methods are excellent starting points for analyzing investments, they’re both poor ending points. Neither provide a reliable basis for comparing investments side-by-side. And neither tell you how much value an investment is adding to your organization.

Other methods such as the Internal Rate of Return and the Profitability Index also fall short of providing key insights to the value of an investment. Finance experts agree that the Net Present Value method is best for methods for delivery this type of analysis.

To see how it works, let’s consider a simple case study where an organization has an opportunity to purchase an automated assembly press for $50,000. The expected life of the assembly project is 7 years, at which time, the press will be sold in the used equipment market for $5,000. This automated press will speed up the assembly process resulting in a $10,000 per year cost savings. How much value would this project add to the organization?

To solve ROI problems, a graphical depiction of the case study like the one shown below is helpful for mapping out the various cash flows.

Project cash flow graph

The initial investment is plotted as a -$50,000 at Year 0, the start of the project. Each of the annual $10,000 labor savings are plotted as +$10,000 at the end of each year, as is the one-time +$5,000 at the end of Year 7.

Using the Payback Period Method, we can easily calculate that the payback period of 5 years. But as we discussed in past article, this method does not account for the time value of money or any events after the payback period. These limitations seriously hamper its value as an analysis tool.

One key component of the Net Present Value Method is the model’s Discount Rate. This rate helps determine the present value of future cash flows. The initial investment of $50,000 is a present cash flow, but the annual costs savings and salvage value are future cash flows. We can’t mix these flows together because future dollars are worth less than present dollars. Like language translators convert Spanish to Russian (or any other language), the discount rate translates future cash flows at their varying distances into the future into a single present cash flow. Once everything is converted into present values, we can add and subtract the values with ease.

The discount rate is very similar to an interest rate with one exception. Interest rates project the future value of a present sum, whereas discount rates project the present value of future sums.

Consider an investment that pays 5% annual interest. If you invest $1,000 today, you will have $1,050 in 12 months. If you continue to invest for another 12 months, the 5% interest applies to the $1,050 compounding your investment to $1102.59 by the end of 24 months. This is expressed formulaically as follows:

$$ \displaystyle P_{f}=P_{p}\left(1+i\right)^{t} $$

where Pf is the future value, Pp is the present value, i is the interest rate, and t is the number of time periods.

The formula for “discounting” future values to a present value based on a compounding discount rate is simply found my manipulating the above formula as follows:

$$ \displaystyle P_{p}=\frac{P_{f}}{\left(1+i\right)^{t}} $$

Unlike interest, which is usually known at the start of an investment or loan, the discount rate is estimated by considering the organization’s Cost of Capital and the perceived risk of a project. In most organizations, a project’s discount rate (also called a “hurdle rate”) is set by the CFO.

Using our previous example, let’s assume a hurdle rate 9%. By discounting the future cash flows to their present-day value, then summing the results, we find that our project adds $3,065 of value to our organization.

example npv calculation

This is far less than the $25,000 we would obtain by simply summing our cash flows without regard to the cost of our organization’s capital.

The Net Present Value Method of calculating a project’s return on investment not only considers the entire project life cycle, but also the time value of money. As a result, NPV is suitable for comparing projects with different timelines and cash flows. It’s also effective in performing “Sensitivity Analysis”- the process of running different scenarios (e.g. best, worst and expected cases) and comparing their projected effect on the organization.

For a deeper dive into capital equipment justification and all the essentials of business finance, sign up today for Return on Investment (ROI) Analysis for Manufacturing.

 

Learn Process Capability Analysis from Ray Harkins

PCA Course logoYou’ll learn how to analyze capability data for a population, for a sample drawn from a population, and from the data found on control charts. Once the foundation for PCA is laid, the course explores more advanced topics.

Instructor: Ray Harkins

See Course Details




Learn Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process from Ray Harkins

image for the Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process Course by Ray Harkins The course not only relies on the “tried and true” methods developed by the quality gurus of old but also draws upon decades of real-life experience by providing dozens of actual examples from manufacturing and engineering.

Instructor: Ray Harkins

See Course Details




Learn Return on Investment (ROI) Analysis for Manufacturing from Ray Harkins

ROI course logoThis course teaches the basics of ROI analysis such as estimating revenues, on-going expenses, and the initial investment. It also explores advanced aspects of capital investment justification such as adjusting for risk, changes to net working capital, and estimating overhead.

Instructor: Ray Harkins

See Course Details

Filed Under: Articles, on Tools & Techniques, The Manufacturing Academy

« Black Swans and the Coronavirus
Is the 5-Ys a Valid RCA Tool for Significant Events? »

Comments

  1. Bo Eriksson says

    November 22, 2020 at 11:09 PM

    Good introduction to NPV.
    To some degree this is about the fundamental reliability engineering question “How much effort shall we put into preventing failures?”. All knows that we have to invest to reduce the field problems but intiutivly we also like to take the cost later which may be perfectly fine as long as the failures are not safety related or causing urgent cost increase.
    NPV does not cover all cost aspects of reliability enineering and failures but is a good starting point.

    Reply
    • Ray Harkins says

      November 26, 2020 at 5:04 AM

      Thank you for your comment, Bo. The “trouble” with NPV is that it only works with numbers. It’s tough to apply numbers to intangibles like reputation, brand loyalty, word of mouth advertising, etc. And in fact, those items are quite valuable.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Ray Harkins
in the The Manufacturing Academy article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member. It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • The Pump-in Process
  • 5 reasons you need to do reliability allocation (and 1 reason you don’t)
  • What is RCA? Separating the Tools from the Methodologies
  • Be Prepared: Have a Plan
  • What is Maintenance Workflow?

© 2021 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy