Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg 2 Comments

Probability and Reliability Goals

Probability and Reliability Goals

Roll the dice.

It is about that simple if any one product will survive to a specific time. Every product has a chance, not a guarantee. The time to failure for each product is a function of the use, stresses, assembly, latent defects or imperfections, and many other variables.

The result is generally unknown. And, we often establish a reliability goal that includes the probability of success. Keep in mind that a probability is only meaningful when defined over a specific duration.

Give a random nature of the many factors the time to failure distribution is based on the time to failure random variable, t.

If the product has one dominant failure mechanism and we are able to accurately relate the use and stress to the time of failure, then use that relationship directly rather than the random variable and distribution. Generally, products have many possible failure mechanisms completing to cause the product’s demise.

Probability and Statistics

In school we learned the basics of probability and statistics.

We learned about the fairness of dice and the chance of specific playing cards being dealt. The same basic laws of mathematics govern the time to failure distributions used in reliability engineering.

We rarely use the normal distribution as products start at time zero and move toward plus infinity, rather than from negative to plus infinity. We can plot histograms of time to failure, determine the appropriate probability distribution function. With the life distribution, we can estimate when 1%, 10% or any percentile of products will fail. We can estimate how many will survive the warranty period or other duration of interest.

Simple Example

If we have a product goal of 99 of 100 should survive one year, that means that over that year we expect only one failure.

Any specific product has a 1 in 100 chance of failing, while 99 of the 100 should continue to operate over the entire year. The probability element comes into play as we do not know which one will fail nor exactly when it will fail.

If the product design, assembly and installation actually result in a 99% reliability (probability of success) over one year, and we have an estimate of the life distribution, we can estimate when during the year the first unit is likely to fail. For example, we may find there is a 0.5% chance of failure over the first 9 months, leaving 0.5% chance of failure the remaining 3 months of the year.

Life distributions do not have to provide constant failure rate over time.

It may be a mix of distributions as different groups of potential failures dominant. We often associate early life failures with manufacturing or transportation damage causing a subset of the total population of units to fail early. As whereat failure mechanisms become dominant the failure rate will increase over time.

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability Tagged With: statistics

« Individuals and Moving Range Charts
Recent CRE exam date »

Comments

  1. Harvinder Tomar says

    May 13, 2020 at 3:44 AM

    As Engineering or Asset Management team we can discussed this but is is difficult to convince top management, We cant predict each component life accurately

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      May 13, 2020 at 6:58 AM

      individual components no, we are not able to predict accurately, yet the entire fleet of similar components, yet we can

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Fred Schenkelberg
in the Musings series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • So, What’s Still Wrong with Maintenance
  • Foundation of Great Project Outcomes – Structures
  • What is the Difference Between Quality Assurance and Quality Control?
  • Covariance of the Kaplan-Meier Estimators?
  • Use Of RFID In Process Safety: Track Hazardous Chemicals And Track Personnel

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.