Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM BlitzĀ®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERMĀ® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
    • Reliability Engineering Management DRAFT
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Greg Hutchins 1 Comment

Risk and Poka-Yoke

Risk and Poka-Yoke

Guest Post byĀ James KlineĀ (first posted on CERMĀ Ā® RISK INSIGHTS – reposted here with permission)

On March 28, 1979, there was a cascading failure in reactor number 2 at Three Mile Island.

This failure allowed large amounts of nuclear reactor coolant to escape. The accident coalesced the anti-nuclear movement and ultimately caused the decline in nuclear plant construction in the United States.

Three Mile Island

As described by Wikipedia, the accident ā€œbegan with failures in the non-nuclear secondary system, followed by a stuck-open pilot-operated relief valve in the primary systemā€.

Analysis also showed that the valves of two backup pumps were left closed by maintenance. A warning light, which would have alerted the operator of the closed valves, was obscured by a maintenance tag.

While the problem was partly blamed on human error and a lack of training, it was also a result of the complexity of the control panel. There were over 750 lights, each with a letter code, some of which had the related flip switches nearby, while others are far away.

Because of the incident at Three Mile Island, the control panels have been modified with color codes.

The purpose of the color coding is to help operators, in a moment of extreme stress, flip the correct switches. Ā This mistake-proofing is the idea behind Poka-yoke. Color coding is a common Poka-yoke practice.

Poka-yokeĀ 

Poka-yoke is the Japanese term for mistake proofing. It is a fundamental quality tool. Poka-yoke actions are designed to: eliminate the opportunity for error; detect the potential for error and prevent the error. This is fundamentally the same objective as the Risk Analyst.

It is a fundamental quality tool. Poka-yoke actions are designed to: eliminate the opportunity for error; detect the potential for error and prevent the error. This is fundamentally the same objective as the Risk Analyst.

This is fundamentally the same objective as the Risk Analyst.

The common objective means that the Poka-yoke framework, while quality oriented, can be useful to the Risk Analyst. Under Poka-yoke mistakes are classified into four categories. These are listed below.

Poka-yoke mistakes are classified into four categories. These are listed below.

1. Information Errors

  • Information is ambiguous.
  • Information is incorrect.
  • Information is misread, misinterpreted or mismeasured.
  • Information is omitted.
  • There’s inadequate warning.

2. Misalignment

  • Parts are misaligned.
  • A part is misadjusted.
  • A machine or process is mistimed.

3. Omission or commission

  • Material or part is added.
  • Prohibited and/or harmful action is performed.
  • Operation is omitted.
  • Parts are omitted, so there’s a counting error.

4. Selection errors

  • A wrong part is used.
  • There’s a wrong operation.
  • There’s a wrong orientation.

As with all methods or schemas, application needs to be adjusted to the specific situation or circumstance. However, this schema does provide a useful framework for analyzing both quality and risk.

Poka-yoke is one example of the overlap between Risk and Quality Analysis.


 

Bio:

James Kline Ph.D. is an ASQ certified Six Sigma Green Belt and Manager of Quality/Organizational Excellence. He has over ten years supervisory and managerial experience. He has consulted on economic, quality and workforce development issues for the City of Corvallis, Benton County Oregon, the State of Oregon and the League of Oregon Cities. He has also published numerous articles related to quality in government.


Related:

Reliability Management and RiskĀ (article)

Reliability Risk Reduction ToolsĀ (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, CERMĀ® Risk Insights, on Risk & Safety

« The Next Step in Your Data Analysis
A Fault Finding a Technique that Works »

Comments

  1. Starli Brighton says

    December 14, 2022 at 5:49 PM

    How great to know that the Poka-yoke framework is useful to a risk analyst. I am starting a new business this year in the industrial field. I will find a good place for machine tool coolant pumps as well for this locally.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CERMĀ® Risk Insights series Article by Greg Hutchins, Editor and noted guest authors

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • How Reliability Engineers Can Improve Their Communication in Information Sessions
  • FMEA Detection Risk: Insights and Advices
  • How to Structure Your ERM System
  • Rate of Occurrence of Failure
  • What is Six Sigma and How is it Used in Quality Engineering?

© 2023 FMS Reliability Ā· Privacy Policy Ā· Terms of Service Ā· Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading ourĀ Cookies Policy.