Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
    • Reliability Engineering Management DRAFT
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

How Should the Sample Size be Selected for an X-bar Chart? (Part I)

How Should the Sample Size be Selected for an X-bar Chart? (Part I)

The purpose of control charts is to detect significant process changes when they occur.  In general, charts that display averages of data/measurements (X-bar charts) are more useful than charts of individual data points or measurements.  Charts of individuals are not nearly as sensitive as charts of averages at detecting process changes quickly.  X-bar charts are far superior at detecting process shifts in a timely manner, and the sample size is a crucial element in ensuring that appropriate chart signals are produced.

Often, the sample size is selected without much thought.  A sample size of 5 seems to be a common choice.  If the sample size is not large enough, then meaningful process shifts may go undetected.  On the other hand, if the sample size is too large, then chart signals may be produced from insignificant process shifts.  The key is to specify a sample size so that significant shifts (from a practical perspective) are detected with high probability and that insignificant shifts are unlikely to produce a signal.

To understand the concept, it is useful to review the impact that averaging data has on variation.  The graphic below compares the distribution of individual values with the distributions of averages of various sample sizes.

We see that as the sample size increases, the standard deviation of the distribution of averages decreases.  Specifically, the relationship below relates the standard deviation of averages to the standard deviation of individuals and the sample size:

$$ \displaystyle \sigma_{\bar{x}}=\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}} $$

On an x-bar control chart, this idea is reflected by control limits getting tighter as the sample size increases.

Now, consider a process that is stable and under statistical control.  This curve is represented by the blue curve on the graphic below.  Suppose we desire that if the process average shifts by a specified amount (such that it is represented by the red curve below), we would want to obtain a chart signal with very high probability.

The question is, how likely is it that we will detect the process shift, if in fact the process shifts from the blue curve to the red curve?  We consider this question for the 4 cases shown in the above graphic.

In the top set of distributions, we are working with individuals.  The control limits for the blue process are represented by the dashed vertical lines.  Following the process shift, we will sample from the red curve.  Note that most of the red curve still falls inside the control limits for the blue curve.  This means that we are very unlikely to see a signal on our chart for the shift indicated.

Now consider, the second set of distributions.  They represent the case where we are using an x-bar chart with sample size = 2.  A shift of the same size is shown.  Here, the process curves are tighter since they represent averages (with n = 2).  While things are better than the first case, there is still a significant overlap between these distributions and it is still not very likely that we will detect the shift quickly.

The case with n = 5 (the third case) is better yet, but still not good enough.  We want to be able to detect the shift with high probability.

Finally, with n = 12 (the last case), we see that for the same size shift, the two distributions are practically separate.  In other words, if the shift occurs, our next sample average will come from the red curve and it will almost certainly be outside of the control limits (based on the blue curve).

Although the above graphics allow us to understand how sample size affects chart sensitivity (the ability to detect desired process changes), a formula is typically used to compute the necessary sample size for a given application.  The sample size is a function of the desired sensitivity, the process standard deviation, and the willingness to tolerate type II errors (where the process shifts but the chart fails to detect the shift).

The formula and its application will be discussed in the next article.

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

« The Informative Run Chart
Nonparametric Forecasts From Left-Censored Data »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Steven Wachs, Integral Concepts
in the Integral Concepts article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Terrorism Risk Insurance Act Exclusions: Gray Coverage Areas
  • Why Total Productive Maintenance Is The Answer To Reliability-Centered Culture
  • 17 Powerful Insights on Effective Communication Using FINESSE
  • Surprising Insights from Simple Run Charts
  • Risk is Round

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.