Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

Home » Page 15

Search Results for: mtbf

by 6 Comments

Review of 2018 ASQ CRE Body of Knowledge

Review of 2018 ASQ CRE Body of Knowledge

The new CRE body of knowledge goes into effect for exams starting January 2018.

The changes include topics that has been dropped, added, or altered. There also is a new structure with 5 main groups rather than the previous seven. Overall, the BoK remained pretty much the same with a reorganization of the topics.

Reading the new BoK and comparing it to the old BoK raises a few concerns or observations. Let’s take a look at the new structure and what the changes say about the reliability engineering profession. [Read more…]

by 3 Comments

10+ Dropped Items from the ASQ CRE Body of Knowledge

10+ Dropped Items from the ASQ CRE Body of Knowledge

A Review of the 2018 ASQ CRE Body of Knowledge

I just noticed the new 2018 ASQ CRE Body of Knowledge had been posted on the ASQ site. The new BoK will be in effect for CRE exams as of January 2018. Thus, we have six months to adjust to the new body of knowledge.

This is part 1 of a multipart review of the new BoK. Here we’ll look at the parts that those preparing for the exam will not have to master or review. There are 10+ topics dropped completely or in part from the BoK.

In future articles, we’ll review what has been added, what has been changed (a review), and how to best prepare for exams based on the new BoK. Plus, we can look over past BoK’s to understand where reliability engineering practice is today.

In part, the logic is these sets of tools (topics) that are not widely used by working reliability engineers. In some cases, I agree, and in others, I don’t. Let’s look at the eight topics not found in the upcoming CRE BoK. [Read more…]

by 1 Comment

The 6 Things Every Maintenance & Reliability Program Needs To Achieve Sustained Results

insanityquoteI want my customers to be successful, every one of them. Yet there are times I can see the writing on the wall and I know as hard as I might try to show them a clear path to what it takes to be successful they have their own plan. Some of them are so complex that people become confused just trying to make sense of them, and others get so hung up in the minutiae of even the simplest of steps like listing a 3 part failure mode they will word-smith themselves to a point where folks just give up. I find myself asking “why do people have to make what is really so simple into something that appears to be complex?” [Read more…]

by Leave a Comment

The Case of Drones

The Case of Drones

Guest post by Dr. Amir Segal & Yizhak Bot of BQR

Introduction

Reliability engineers are equipped with an arsenal of techniques (FTA, RBD, Markov, FMEA / FMECA, SIL) for reliability, availability, safety and maintainability analysis. However, it is not always clear when to use each technique.
In order to design a safe and reliable product, reliability engineering techniques should be integrated with the system design process. This fact is well known, and today many system engineering conferences include discussions regarding reliability and safety [1,2]. [Read more…]

by Leave a Comment

Relating to Reliability Goals

Reliability goals are often communicated in Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) 40,000 hrs,  Failure rate  0.00035,  or percentage still functioning over time  99.98%.  If you are not familiar with actually calculating these numbers they really don’t mean a lot.  Are any of those above numbers good?  bad? something we will even measure before release?

Are any of those above numbers good?  bad? something we will even measure before release? [Read more…]

by Leave a Comment

The Perfect Strength and Stress Concepts

The Perfect Strength and Stress Concepts

Recently Peter Stuttard asked if I knew of a reference for the perfect strength and perfect stress concepts. I didn’t and asked for a bit of explanation of the phrases.

Here is his reply (via Linkedin, btw a great tool to get and stay in touch) posted with permission with minor formatting edits.

To learn more about Peter check out his Linkedin profile.

Fred

Thanks for responding so quickly, the concepts of Perfect Strength and Perfect Stress are related to your discussion re Parts Count and Parts Stress predictions and reading this on your web site prompted me to ask you about them. [Read more…]

by Leave a Comment

Searching for Quick Fixes Now Leads to Problems Down the Road

Searching for Quick Fixes Now Leads to Problems Down the Road

I want it now and I want it cheap! Oh – and I don’t want to do any work for it.

When it comes to information, entertainment, finding your way around and communications these days, we more or less literally have it all at our fingertips and available to us just about anywhere.

We can even order and pay for coffee to pick up on our way from the commuter train to the office – no lineups for delays. We can book hotels, airlines and rental cars at the touch of our fingers with apps that show us the cheapest options.

We live in a world where instant gratification is a reality in many aspects of our private lives.

Consumer electronics has transformed a great deal of business – basically, anything where there is a service or goods that a consumer might buy on their own, we can get it easily and immediately.

We’ve grown used to instant gratification in much [Read more…]

by Leave a Comment

RCA – Show Me the Money

RCA – Show Me the Money

Reliability initiatives are implemented to improve a company’s bottom line, period.  

Root cause analysis is one of the fastest ways I know to achieve this improvement.  My boss used to say “show me the money” because he realized that upper management was driven by ROI (Return on Investment) or ROC (Return on Capital). 

You can argue all you want on whether that is good or bad, but it is the way things are. [Read more…]

  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.

by Leave a Comment

3 Case Studies of How to Define the Right Reliability Requirements for Each Customer

3 Case Studies of How to Define the Right Reliability Requirements for Each Customer

We all probably know Fred’s fight against the use of “MTBF” as a default measure of reliability.

And I concur. “MTBF” offers the least insight to product reliability. It offers little to the user in terms of realizing the benefits of reliability.

However, we all would like to see products that deliver more appealing benefits; and reliability is a key factor. But reliability is only part of the equation.

Technical performance is important.

So is price. So is appearance. So is delivery. So is the customer: different customers may see the world differently. And so may your competitors.

So, we can’t all adopt the same measurement for reliability. [Read more…]

  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.

by Leave a Comment

RCA is the Bedrock of a Reliability Program

RCA is the Bedrock of a Reliability Program

Basic Reliability Definition

Occasionally, I like to step back and reflect on reliability in basic terms.

In that spirit, the basic premise of reliability is usually stated as “The probability that an item will perform a required function, without failure, under stated conditions, for a stated period of time.”

To use the reliability equation, the definition of failure must be defined, so you can tell if your equipment has indeed failed.  This way you can include it in the MTBF (Mean Time Between Failure) calculation.

After you have defined a failure and recorded them appropriately, you can plug the numbers into the reliability equation, R = e ^-(λ*t)  where λ is the failure rate which is defined as λ= 1/MTBF and come up with an objective value for the reliability. [Read more…]

  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.

by Leave a Comment

Adjusting to Customer Expectations Changing

Adjusting to Customer Expectations Changing

Customers Expectations Tend Toward Better Reliability Over Time

Reliability goals or objectives are just a starting point.

You goals represent your target at one point in time.

At best they represent what your customers expect for reliability performance at one point in time.

When goals are set well, they anticipate what your customer expects when they receive your product. In a perfect world, you customer will find the reliability performance just a bit better than expected.

It’s not a perfect world. [Read more…]

by Leave a Comment

Math, Statistics, and Engineering

Math, Statistics, and Engineering

14586673050_b71972cc74_m_dMath, Statistics, and Engineering

In college, Mechanics was a required class from the civil engineering department. This included differential equation.

Luckily for me, I also enjoyed a required course called analytical mechanics for my physics degree. This included using Lagrange and Hamiltonian equations to derived a wide range of formulas to solve mechanisms problems.

In the civil engineering course, the professor did the derivation as the course lectures, then expected us to use the right formula to solve a problem. He even gave us a ‘cheat sheet’ with an assortment of derived equations. We just had to identify which equation to use for a particular problem and ‘plug-and-chug’ or just work out the math. It was boring. [Read more…]