Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Dennis Craggs Leave a Comment

SPC Assumptions

SPC Assumptions

Introduction

Statistical Process Controls (SPC) is a suite of methods that can be employed to control a manufacturing or assembly process. It has a wide range of potential applications ranging from consumer products to defense. It can be employed at the lowest element of component manufacturing or an assembly operation.

This article discusses the assumptions necessary to understand SPC.

Fundamental Assumptions

  • The process is stable and in control.
  • The data are independent of each other.
  • The data of each subgroup are identically distributed.
  • Real valued data are approximately normally distributed and counting data may be approximated by the normal distribution.
  • A measurement can occur in only one subgroup, i.e., sampling without replacement.

Stable Controlled Processes

The most important assumption is that a process can be controlled. The process is subject to common causes of variation, but special causes are absent. I was involved in a component process signoff. The process injected molded material around a sensor. The material needed to be preheated prior to the injection molding process.  However, the process controls were not secured. Anybody with access to the work station could adjust the dials. It was easy to set the duration to zero. The material would be injected at room temperature, damage the electronics, and produce defective parts. The plant quality manager was alerted to the issue, access to the control was restricted to the process control engineers, and removed this special cause of defects.

The challenge is to identify potential special causes before defects occur. Special causes can come from materials, methods, personnel, tools, machinery, and the environment. In modern manufacturing software controls and electronics need to be considered. A process FMEA should be created and reviewed by a team of design, manufacturing, and quality engineers plus experienced line personnel. For carryover processes with minor modifications, the team should focus on prior failure modes and the modifications.

Independence

The standard statistical assumption is that the data is independent and uncorrelated with the prior values. Any variation is from common causes. An example of a correlated process is the flight path of an aircraft. The current position is determined by the prior flight history, i.e., position and velocity. Embedded in the flight data is both common cause and special cause. A special cause would be changes in the flight controls. A common cause would be instrument measurement errors.

In manufacturing, tool wear is a cause of variation for some processes. The process average is constantly shifting, but at a known rate. About the expected average, there is variation due to common cause. The data can be corrected to account for the shift in the process average and the remaining variation should be common cause. A special SPC chart called the Average and Moving range can be used.

Distributions

The data from a stable controlled process can be described by statistical distribution appropriate to the type of data:

  • Real numbers are used to describe continuous variables. Measurements provide real numbered data rounded to some precision by the capability of the measurement equipment. The data can take any value within a range of values subject to some physical constraints. For example, the diameter of a hole or the electrical resistance of a circuit component will never have a negative value. Similarly, extremely large values are restricted for some processes. Measurement equipment provides data rounded to some definite precision. For example, I have a digital caliper that can be used to measure gaps from 0 to 6” with a precision of 0.001”. To analyze the data, the normal distribution is probably the most widely used, but in special situations, the lognormal and Weibull should be considered.
  • Counts of defects occur frequently in quality data. The count is a non-negative integer. Examples of this type of data could be the number of bubbles above a specific size in a unit of glass. Similarly, a void count in a cast or injection molded part is a reasonable quality measure. The binomial and Poisson distributions are used with counting data.
  • Other types of data may be subjective. For example, during the injection molding of an aluminum part, the mold surface can wear. The surface displays a unique appearance, but is difficult to measure. In this case, a picture of a worn mold was needed to alert the operator and the process engineers that a mold change was required.

Sample Group Distribution

Instead of measuring 100% of product, SPC methods rely on sampling. Sample groups from a stable process will show similar process averages and variation. If a special cause occurs, the process can suddenly shift to a new average and/or show a variation change. SPC charts provide visual descriptions of these sample groups average and variation. A goal is to make high probability decisions of the presence or absence of special causes.

Conclusions

If a process is stable and in control, the individual data are independent, data variation is due to common cause, then SPC methods may be used. The appropriate statistical method depends on the type of data to be analyzed.

Future articles in this series present further discussion of data types, the appropriate distribution, and how to construct control charts. The next article considers continuous variable measurement data, the normal distribution, and control charts. Understanding the construction of the charts builds an understanding of how to use the charts.

Note

If anybody wants to engage me as a consultant or trainer on this or other topics, please contact me. I have worked in Quality, Reliability, Applied Statistics, and Data Analytics over 30 years in design engineering and manufacturing. In the university, I taught at the graduate level. Also, I provide Minitab seminars to corporate clients, write articles, and have presented and written papers at SAE, ISSAT, and ASQ. I want to assist you.

Dennis Craggs, Consultant
810-964-1529
dlcraggs@me.com

 

 

 

Filed Under: Articles, Big Data & Analytics, on Tools & Techniques

« Set Up of New Equipment
Conductivity Meter Operation & Use »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Big Data & Analytics series Article by Dennis Craggs

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • How to Reduce Maintenance Cost The Right Way
  • Significance Over Success. Innovation Over Change. Anticipation Over Agility
  • Maintenance Planning and Scheduling for World Class Reliability and Maintenance Performance
  • Self-Discipline Part 1
  • Is Safety Training Helpful?

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.