Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

What Is a Standard Deviation and How Do I Compute It?

What Is a Standard Deviation and How Do I Compute It?

Most manufacturers would rate product quality as a key driver of their overall ability to satisfy customers and compete in a global market.  Poor quality is simply not tolerated. It follows that manufacturers require objective measures of their product quality.  While many companies still think of quality as “being in specification,” progressive companies focus on reducing variation to minimize waste and produce products that perform consistently well over time.  Quality may be thought of as inversely proportional to variation–that is, as variation increases, product quality decreases.

Since variation and quality go hand-in-hand, we require objective measures of variation.  The standard deviation is a statistic that describes the amount of variation in a measured process characteristic.  Specifically, it computes how much an individual measurement should be expected to deviate from the mean on average.  As shown below, the larger the standard deviation, the more dispersion there is in the process data.


All three processes above have a mean (average) of 10, but the standard deviations vary.  A smaller standard deviation means greater consistency, predictability and quality.

We can define a population (or process) standard deviation (usually indicated by σ) as well as a sample standard deviation (usually indicated by s).  Typically, the true process standard deviation is unknown so we compute a sample standard deviation in order to estimate it.

Computing the Standard Deviation

The formula for computing the standard deviation depends on whether we are computing the population (process) standard deviation or the sample standard deviation.  In order to compute the true value, all of the data comprising the population or process of interest must be measured (usually not feasible).

The formula for computing the true process standard deviation is:

$$ \displaystyle \sigma=\sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{N}\left(X_{i}-\mu\right)^{2}}{N}} $$

where Xi = the ith data value, μ = the true process average, N = the population size

Essentially, the formula tells us to do the following:

  1. Compute the process average μ
  2. Subtract the process average from each measured data value (the Xi values)
  3. Square each of the deviations computed in step 2
  4. Add up all of the squared deviations computed in step 3
  5. Divide the result of step 4 by the sample size
  6. Finally, take the square root of the step 5 result

Why do we need to square the deviations then take the square root? If we simply computed the average deviation of each value from the mean (the step 2 values)–we would always get a result of zero!  (This is because the positive deviations would cancel the negative deviations.)  Squaring and “un-squaring” resolves this issue and ensures that our standard deviation will have the same units that our measured values have.

An example: My daughter’s soccer team has eight girls on the team and their heights in inches are as follows:

46.3, 48.4, 47.1, 45.8, 48.0, 50.1, 46.7, 48.5

The standard deviation of the team’s height (we have access to the entire population here!) is found using the above formula and steps:

  1. Compute the process average μ

$$ \displaystyle \mu=\frac{46.3+48.4+47.1+45.8+48.0+50.1+46.7+48.5}{8}=47.6 $$

  1. Subtract the process average from each measured data value (the Xi values)
  2. Square each of the deviations computed in step 2
  3. Add up all of the squared deviations computed in step 3
  4. Divide the result of step 4 by the sample size
  5. Finally, take the square root of the step 5 result

$$ \displaystyle \begin{aligned} \small \sigma=&\sqrt{\frac{(46.3-47.6)^{2}+(48.4-47.6)^{2}+(47.1-47.6)^{2}+45.8-47.6)^{2}+(48.0-47.6)^{2}+(50.1-47.6)^{2}+(46.7-47.6)^{2}+(48.5-47.6)^{2}}{8}}\\\sigma=&1.4 \end{aligned} $$

The Sample Standard Deviation

Usually, we can only estimate the true standard deviation by using a sample. The formula for a sample standard deviation (S) is slightly different than the formula for s.  First of all, since we cannot compute μ (a true population or process average), we must estimate it using the sample data. This is called the sample average and is usually called x-bar. The other difference is not so obvious. Rather than dividing by the sample size (N), we divide by (n-1). The formula is:

$$ \displaystyle \textrm{S}=\sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(X_{i}-\bar{X}\right)^{2}}{\left(n-1\right)}} $$

where Xi = the ith data value, x-bar = the sample average, n = the sample size.

The reason for dividing by n-1 has to do with a concept called “degrees of freedom.” (An intuitive explanation will be given in a future article.)

Uses of Standard Deviation

Many statistical methods such as Statistical Process Control, Gage R&R, and Design of Experiments utilize the standard deviation to estimate variability.  Sometimes the square of the standard deviation (called the Variance) is utilized because of its nice additive properties.

The key point is that the standard deviation is an objective measure of variation.  Focusing on minimizing the standard deviation of key process characteristics will result in higher quality and customer satisfaction.

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

« How Can Reliability Engineers Improve Maintenance Management
Terry and Maura Jun 4th »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Steven Wachs, Integral Concepts
in the Integral Concepts article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • Risk And Safety
  • Risk Prioritization in FMEA – a Summary
  • What Are Best Practices for Facilitating Qualitative Assessments?
  • So, What’s Still Wrong with Maintenance
  • Foundation of Great Project Outcomes – Structures

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.