Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Robert Allen Leave a Comment

Tiered Meetings Structure Enables Production Oversight & Support

Tiered Meetings Structure Enables Production Oversight & Support

A complex production process requires a mixture of leadership, governance and management.  In this article, we’ll discuss a tiered meetings structure that can effectively enable this.  Empowerment, escalation paths, accountability and responsibility are included as some key ingredients.  We’ll start with the following diagram:

Production Floor Team Meeting (Tier 1):  the production supervisor (or manager) holds a daily meeting to resolve production issues (ideally) within the “shop floor” reporting structure.  Production issues are resolved directly by team members to the maximum extent possible.  Complex issues can be escalated to the production support core team.  Generally, the meeting would be held at the start of each shift (or during shift changes) with the goal of resolving issues in preparation for the day (or shift).

Production Core Team Meeting (Tier 2):  the production core team meeting is called by the operations project manager (Ops PM), but is primarily lead by core team leaders (CTLs) for their respective areas of expertise.  The Ops PM is responsible for keeping KPIs up-to-date, collecting information from production supervisors, facilitating the meetings, documenting action items or assisting with project schedules for more involved root-cause corrective action projects.  CTLs are the (functional) technical leads depending on the production problem that needs to be resolved (quality, engineering, manufacturing process, etc.).  Extended team members are expected to be responsive to the needs of the CTLs, and provide the expected deliverables required to resolve the issue(s).

The CTL and Ops PM also communicate the demand for functional resources to functional managers.  The functional managers may have constraints and communicate these constraints back to the core team.  If additional resources or skillsets are required, the escalation path is to the (Tier 3) steering committee meeting.

Production Steering Committee Meeting (Tier 3):  The Ops PM facilitates the weekly meeting and presents production key performance indicators to a committee of functional managers and the chairperson.  The CTLs present the status of production issues which they are responsible.  The steering committee chairperson keeps meetings efficient and effective, resolves issues and has the ultimate accountability for production performance.  The goal of the meeting is to provide the CTLs the support they need to be successful, the primary levers being cost/resources, scope or schedule.  The overall focus is on functional excellence.

Let’s use the example of supplier part shortages, a common problem for a production process:

Production Floor Team Meeting:  supplier part shortages are identified and addressed ‘real-time’ by a shop floor expeditor to the extent possible.  Supplier part shortages that need to be escalated are added to a list and provided to the production core team meeting CTL responsible supplier order fulfillment.  The CTL may communicate status through an expeditor or may provide status directly by attending production floor meetings.

Production Core Team Meeting:  the CTL responsible for supplier order fulfillment summarizes actions planned, or being taken, to ensure supplier parts are provided.  He or she may need an order scheduler, other procurement personnel, or supplier quality as team members and enlist the help of the OPS PM and functional managers to obtain this.  The “supplier order fulfillment CTL” also summarizes systemic issues or problematic suppliers in preparation for the production steerco meeting.  If escalation is required, the CTL and/or the Ops PM negotiates for skillsets with the functional manager.

Production Steering Committee Meeting:  the supplier order fulfillment CTL summarizes status, actions taken, projects and where he or she needs help.  Since the primary levers are cost/resources, scope or schedule, actions enabled by the production steerco might include enabling supplier visits, paying expedite fees, deferring engineering changes, etc.  Also, the production steerco might enable project resources to address systemic issues, such as scheduling inaccuracies.  A benefit of the steering committee is the VP or Director visibility across all the functions and/or with respect to specific cross-functional issues affecting production.  The Ops PM also has this visibility and can work closely with the VP or director to facilitate awareness of functional excellence.

Note several features listed as follows:

  • Production supervisor is responsible and accountable on the shop floor within his span of control
  • CTLs are functionally-based to address problems related to their area of expertise
  • CTLs may also lead special project teams outside of the production meetings
  • CTLs can be reassigned issues if, for example, a production issue is better addressed by engineering or vice-versa
  • Each tier has an escalation path
  • Escalation is primarily based on adding more resources or skillsets (supporting existing functional expertise and not necessarily “second-guessing” the solution path)
  • Escalation is through the core team efforts first, and with the functional managers concurrence to bring it to the steering committee
  • Functional managers focus on providing skillsets or experience in their area of discipline
  • Ops PMs are responsible and accountable for effectively facilitating meetings, escalating issues, project and program management
  • Ops PMs are not responsible or accountable for technical decision-making
  • CTLs are responsible, Functional Managers are accountable at the Tier 2 level
  • Meeting chairperson (director or VP) is accountable functional managers are responsible, at the Tier 3 level
  • Tier 3 should be asking how Tier 2 could be empowered without escalating issues…same is true for Tier 2 / 1.

Your production process might require an additional layer (tier), or might require clarification of roles and responsibilities.  At the very least, consider empowerment, escalation paths, accountability, responsibility and meeting effectiveness as some fundamentals of a continuous robust production support process.

Filed Under: Articles, on Leadership & Career, Product Development and Process Improvement Tagged With: engineering, lean manufacturing, project governance, Project Management, Project Manager, Project Schedule, six sigma, Statistical Process control (SPC) and process capability

« Trade War and Supply Chain Risk Management
Design for Six Sigma »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Rob Allen
in the Product Development and Process Improvement series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Join PD&PI

Your email is safe and the opt-in here provides your permission to send messages concerning the PD&PI article list plus special announcements. Privacy Policy

Recent Posts

  • Self-Discipline Part 1
  • Is Safety Training Helpful?
  • FINESSE Facilitation: What Are Best Practices for Qualitative Assessment Analysis?
  • ISO 9001 Context and in the Real World, What do we do?
  • The Galvanic Corrosion Piping Trap!

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.