Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • CMMSradio
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Asset Performance
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Hardware Product Develoment Lifecycle
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
      • FMEA Introduction
      • AIAG & VDA FMEA Methodology
    • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction
      • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Home » Articles » on Product Reliability » Reliability Knowledge » ALT: An in Depth Description

by Semion Gengrinovich Leave a Comment

ALT: An in Depth Description

ALT: An in Depth Description

Accelerated Life Testing (ALT) is a method used in reliability engineering to assess the lifespan and performance of a product under accelerated stress conditions. The goal is to uncover potential faults and failures in a shorter time frame than would be possible under normal operating conditions. ALT is particularly useful when the product’s expected lifespan is long, and waiting for failures to occur naturally is not feasible.

In the context of Design Verification (DV), ALT can help shorten the testing time by inducing failures more quickly than under normal conditions. This allows engineers to identify and address potential issues earlier in the product development process, thereby improving the product’s reliability and reducing the time to market.

For example, consider an aluminum part used in automotive applications. The primary stressor for this part would be cyclic mechanical loading, which can cause fatigue over time. An ALT would subject the part to this stress at an accelerated rate, causing it to fail more quickly than it would under normal conditions. By analyzing the part’s response to the test, engineers can predict its lifespan and maintenance intervals under normal service parameters.

Aluminum 6061 is a widely used alloy in the automotive sector due to its excellent strength-to-weight ratio, corrosion resistance, and weldability, making it suitable for various applications including frame components, wheels, and suspension parts.

Yield Strength and Stress Levels

The yield tensile strength of 6061 aluminum alloy is 276 MPa (40,000 psi) please see (Fig. 1)

Based on this, we define three stress levels for the ALT:

  1. First Stress Level (90% of Yield Strength): This level is set at 90% of the yield strength, which calculates to 248.4 MPa.
  2. Second Stress Level (80% of Yield Strength): This level is set at 80% of the yield strength, which calculates to 220.8 MPa.
  3. Third Stress Level (70-75% of Yield Strength): For a range, we consider the average, setting this level at 72.5% of the yield strength, which calculates to 200.1 MPa.
Fig.1 Stress-Strain, Aluminium 6061

For every stress level 3 samples was failed, fitting the Weibull distribution and choosing different Reliability and confidence level, (pay attention axes are in Logarithmic scale, see Fig. 2):

Fig.2 Stress Amplitude vs. time to failure.

The blue step function (see Fig.3) appears to represent the stress amplitude levels and the corresponding number of cycles at each level that the part is expected to experience throughout its life. The steps in the function indicate changes in stress amplitude, with each horizontal segment corresponding to a period where the stress amplitude remains constant.

Visually, the blue step function does not intersect or cross the black solid line labeled as R99.9 C99.9. This suggests that the stress levels and the number of cycles at each level are within the bounds of the R99.9 C99.9 reliability and confidence level.

In other words, the part is expected to withstand the stress levels represented by the blue line without reaching the failure criteria associated with the R99.9 C99.9 line.

According to Miner’s rule, the cumulative damage is calculated by summing the ratios of the number of cycles experienced at each stress level to the number of cycles to failure at that stress level. Since the blue line does not cross the black line, it implies that the cumulative damage DD is less than 1, meaning the part is not expected to fail within the life cycle represented by the blue line, given the reliability and confidence level of R99.9 C99.9.

Fig. 3 Stress amplitude vs cycle to failure, and the stress amplitude usage stress (blue line)

The ability to predict failures and estimate product lifespan through ALT enables companies to enhance product design, improve quality, and ensure reliability before market release. It also facilitates the identification of potential failure modes and the development of maintenance schedules, which are crucial for safety-critical components.

Furthermore, ALT can be tailored to specific reliability and confidence level targets, such as R99.9 C99.9, allowing engineers to validate that products meet stringent reliability standards.

By leveraging the insights gained from ALT, companies can achieve a competitive edge by reducing time-to-market and minimizing the risk of costly recalls or customer dissatisfaction due to product failures.

The process of conducting an ALT typically involves the following steps:

Define the test objectives: This could be to identify failure modes, estimate the part’s life expectancy, or verify design margins.

Select the stressors: These are the types of stresses the part will experience in service. For an aluminum part, the primary stressor would be cyclic mechanical loading.

Develop the test plan: This involves designing the test to apply the selected stressors in a controlled and measurable way.

Conduct the test: The test is run according to the plan, and the part is monitored for signs of fatigue. The test continues until the part fails or reaches a predetermined number of cycles.

Analyze the data: The results are used to estimate the part’s life under normal conditions. This can involve statistical analysis and modeling.

In conclusion, ALT is a valuable tool in reliability engineering and DV, allowing for the prediction of product lifespan and the identification of potential issues in a shorter time frame than under normal conditions. This can lead to improved product reliability, reduced testing time, and faster time to market.

Filed Under: Articles, on Product Reliability, Reliability Knowledge

About Semion Gengrinovich

In my current role, leveraging statistical reliability engineering and data-driven approaches to drive product improvements and meet stringent healthcare industry standards. Im passionate about sharing knowledge through webinars, podcasts and development resources to advance reliability best practices.

« Project Email Economics
3 Types of MTBF Stories »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Reliability Knowlege series logo Photo of Semion GengrinovichArticles & Videos by Semion Gengrinovich
in the Reliability Knowledge article & video series

Recent Posts

  • How to Get from Idea to Scale
  • Two Ways to Think and Talk about Reliability
  • Reliability Allocation
  • Good Project Management Leadership Will Reduce Project Risk
  • Using Condition Monitoring as a Reliability Improvement Strategy

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

Book the Course with John
  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.
This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.