Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

How do I Implement SPC for Short Production Runs (Part II)?

How do I Implement SPC for Short Production Runs (Part II)?

In Part I of this article, we introduced the concept of utilizing Deviation from Nominal (DNOM) control charts for short production runs.  These charts allow us to monitor process characteristics over time even when the units being controlled have varying nominal values.  DNOM charts assume that the process variability (i.e. standard deviation) does not vary significantly by part type.  However, often this assumption does not hold.  Characteristics with larger nominal values tend to have more variation than characteristics with smaller nominal values.  In Part II we discuss how to test whether or not significant differences in variability exist and if so, how to modify the DNOM methods and charts to handle this situation.

Testing for Variation Differences

A statistical test may be performed to test whether the differences observed in the standard deviations (or variances) of multiple groups represent a statistically significant difference.  Statistically significant differences mean that it is very unlikely that the magnitude of the differences occurred by chance.

Recall the data we presented in the example in Part I of the article:

When only two groups are being tested, an F test is performed (if each group follows a normal distribution) or a Levene’s Test is performed (if the normality assumption does not hold).

When more than two groups are being tested, a Bartlett’s test is performed (if the groups follow a normal distribution) or a Levene’s Test is performed (if the normality assumption does not hold).

The above graphic illustrates the results of the hypothesis test for equal variances for the 3 part types shown in the previous data.  The relatively large p values (> 0.05) indicate that we do not have sufficient evidence to conclude that the variances are different (with 95% confidence).

In this case, a regular DNOM chart (and S chart) would be appropriate.

Variation Differences

Now, we consider the case where the groups do not share a common degree of variation.  Data on Inner Diameter on 3 Part Types is shown below.  A statistical test is performed to test for equality of variances.

Clearly more variation exists for the larger diameter parts than for the smaller diameter parts.  The very small p-values (< 0.0005) indicate that the differences in group variances are statistically significant.  You can also see this by noticing that the estimated standard deviations of each group fall outside the confidence intervals for the other groups’ estimated standard deviations.

What if we hadn’t checked and just constructed a regular DNOM and S chart?  Can the 3 part types (segregated by the dashed vertical lines) be adequately monitored on these charts (on the next page)?

Standardized DNOM and Standardized S Charts

Since the control limits are based on the observed variation, we need a method to account for the variation differences between the groups.  The solution to the problem is a Standardized DNOM chart (to monitor location) and Standardized S chart (to monitor variation).

The Standardized DNOM chart plots the number of standard deviations each sample average is from the nominal value.  This is found simply by computing the deviation from nominal (as before) and dividing it by the estimated standard deviation for that part type.  Since each plotted sample statistic accounts for its specific group standard deviation, the data can be combined onto one chart.  The Standardized S Chart plots the ratio of the Sample Standard Deviation to the Group Standard Deviation.  The following table illustrates the required calculations.

The standardized DNOM is in the next to last column and the standardized S statistic is in the last column.  The notation, key statistics, and control limits for both charts are shown below.

Standardized DNOM and Standardized S Notation and Control Chart Calculations

pastedGraphic_5.png

pastedGraphic_6.png

pastedGraphic_7.png

 

 

Standardized DNOM and Standardized S charts based on the above data and calculations are shown below.

Summary

This article completes the 2-part series describing control charts for short production runs.  This article presented methods to test whether or not significant differences in variability among the part types exist.  When significant differences in variability exist, Standardized DNOM and S charts should be utilized.

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

« Should We Call it Precision Maintenance?
Asset Management Systems for Small Groups »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Steven Wachs, Integral Concepts
in the Integral Concepts article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • How to Reduce Maintenance Cost The Right Way
  • Significance Over Success. Innovation Over Change. Anticipation Over Agility
  • Maintenance Planning and Scheduling for World Class Reliability and Maintenance Performance
  • Self-Discipline Part 1
  • Is Safety Training Helpful?

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.