
Ann Marie Neufelder at RAMS Software Reliability
Abstract
Adam and Ann Marie discussing Software Reliability best practices
ᐅ Play Episode
Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site
by Adam Bahret Leave a Comment

Adam and Ann Marie discussing Software Reliability best practices
ᐅ Play Episode
by James Kovacevic Leave a Comment

This episode of the rooted in reliability podcast is about the condition of predictive maintenance in the industry and the guest in this episode is Thomas Wilk who is the editor in chief in Plant Services—a publication in the field of maintenance and reliability. There is no doubt in the fact that predictive maintenance is very critical for increasing uptime of your equipment and the productivity of your plant. When you can predict the failures that are sure to occur in the earlier or later stages, that is where you start to make the smart decisions regarding the maintenance of your assets that you have placed in your organization.
ᐅ Play Episode
by Adam Bahret Leave a Comment

Adam and Keegan discussing all the interesting factors of a career in Reliability Engineering
ᐅ Play Episode

Andre and Fred discussing finite element analysis and how it may be useful for reliability engineering professionals.
ᐅ Play Episode
by Fred Schenkelberg 2 Comments

Every failure has valuable information you and your team require to improve reliability. During the development process, each failure may represent a future recall. Celebrate every failure. Let your FRACAS prioritize which failures to resolve.
[Read more…]
by James Kovacevic Leave a Comment

In today’s episode, the guest Fred Schenkelberg explains the Monte Carlo simulation in a fair amount of detail. Before you get in the depth of how the tool works, you need to understand what basically this method is. The Monte Carlo simulation has been around since World War 2 and it is a mathematical technique that works based on probability functions, random variables, and the distribution of statistical data. The main concept of it to give the decision maker the most obvious choices while facing any risks to get the best out of every possible outcome. The tool serves the purpose for getting a better insight of the consequences relative to each choice the person making decisions has to make. When you’re looking for the reliability of your assets and checking the integrity of your different maintenance programs, it is a really powerful tool.
ᐅ Play Episode
by Carl S. Carlson Leave a Comment

Carl and Fred discussing the need to integrate Design for Reliablity activities throughout the entire organization.
ᐅ Play Episode
by Carl S. Carlson Leave a Comment

Carl and Fred discussing the reliability tool called “Root Cause Analysis,” and how RCA can be used in reliability programs.
ᐅ Play Episode
by James Kovacevic Leave a Comment

In this episode, the guest Paul Crocker tells his inspiring Maintenance and Reliability Engineering journey. He is an Uptime award holder in the innovative use of photography for maintenance in the Kansas City. He has been taking pictures of every equipment in the workshops, in the field, and everywhere he can. These pictures have worked like a living notebook for him—just a much better to look at, kind of. He suggests it to his coworkers and trains people to do the same as pictures of issues that an engineer faces in routine, failure data and equipment information can be pretty useful sometimes.
ᐅ Play Episode

Kirk and Fred discussing the difficulty of getting the failed products, especially low cost systems, back from the field to do failure analysis on.
ᐅ Play Episode

Kirk and Fred discussing what Reliability Engineers do considering the past and current approaches to reliability development
ᐅ Play Episode
by Tim Rodgers Leave a Comment

Fred interviews Ann Marie an author and consultant concerning her work in the field of software reliability.
by James Kovacevic Leave a Comment

Implementing Parts Kitting is challenging as doing so requires numerous systems, processes, and people to work together. This paper describes appropriate steps for successful implementation of Parts Kitting in a sustainable manner and outlines pitfalls to avoid.
At an average facility, maintenance staff wrench time is approximately 30% (Figure 1). That means that they only spent this amount of their time performing repairs and Preventative Maintenance or other value added work. The rest of the time is lost for a variety of reasons. Businesses work to address this lack in efficiency by implementing a maintenance planning & scheduling functions. When properly implemented, many realize the benefits in craft efficiency. However, improper implementation of these planning and scheduling functions leads to minimal or no improvement in work productivity. One of the main reasons for this lack of improvement is the time the craft spend traveling & looking for parts.
ᐅ Play Episode

James and Fred discussing the ongoing task to have the right parts available at the right time.
ᐅ Play Episode

Andre and Fred discussing the language of variation and why you need to speak this language as a reliability engineer.
ᐅ Play Episode
Ask a question or send along a comment.
Please login to view and use the contact form.