Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Gina Tabasso Leave a Comment

It Takes a Village

It Takes a Village

In May 2018, we sponsored a summit that brought electric power reliability leaders from all over the country to Houston to discuss the gap in reliability. I’ve had a few weeks now to reflect on the event, and I want to share those thoughts with you.

If SDMyers was the mother of the Electric Power Reliability Summit (EPRS), then I feel like I was the midwife.

Parents and midwives often have many questions about the baby before it is born. Will it be ugly? Will it sleep through the night? Who will take care of it in years to come? There were lots of questions about EPRS too (and, indeed, expectations) from our marketing group, from our sales group, and from leadership. We all shared variations of the same two questions, really: First, how many people would attend? And second, for would those who did come to the summit, what would they get out of it?

I was disappointed that there weren’t more reliability people keen (or aware) enough about the gap in electric reliability to come to the summit. But as far as information and content is concerned, the summit absolutely delivered, and the speakers each brought something worth hearing to the table.

We took a higher-order approach when we were putting the EPRS together. We decided to talk about where electrical system reliability fits in the whole scheme of corporate reliability. We had some of the most influential experts from the reliability field set the scene, and we were delighted to host Terry O’Hanlon (of ReliabilityWeb.com) on day one and Howard Penrose (Chair of the Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals) on day two as our keynotes.

We wanted EPRS to be different from other conferences. We wanted experts who are living electric reliability in their day-to-day operations to share their experiences and show us how it can be done. Dan Smith, of Austin Energy, did a magnificent job of showing us how the principles of electric power reliability apply to a very dynamic organization, one that serves a smart city which is among the fastest-growing cities in America with a very, very heavy focus on renewables. They also have a heavy focus on managing things differently from how they were managed in the past. Austin Energy is using all of the tools that everybody else talks about, and they have made reliability a key component of their organization. For them, safety is first, and the reliability of their systems second. Resiliency is their third. That’s going to be a big thing for next year.

Tony Dotson, from WestRock Paper, and Juan Rodriguez, from Gerdau Steel, spoke about how the culture of a corporation can change. They were at EPRS to show us how they got their organizations to look at a corporate reliability program for the high voltage system, and to share their struggles throughout the process.

When we conceived the EPRS we knew we wanted experts from every subfield of power system reliability. I work primarily with transformers, so if you ask me what makes up a high-voltage system I will probably talk to you about transformers. But an electrical system includes switchgear, breakers, relays, and cables, too. Every part of the system had an expert representative, and, in only a short period of time, each presented how their piece fits into the reliability of the system. We also had representatives from the insurance industry discuss risk, giving us a whole different perspective that is not always front-of-mind. What they all did was connect their separate disparate part to the whole, and people walked away getting that.

The consensus—and the main message, I think—is that power systems are at risk, but they can be protected. We were shown what you need to look at to protect them, and to see where the future of reliability is going.

For me, the most important takeaway from the summit was connections. People got to know each other and learn from each other and have conversations that were relevant to what they do every day. We want to keep those connections strong, and that’s going to be up to us to maintain that. Because if I feel like I am the midwife, and that the child is now birthed, we’re going to need a village to help raise it. And you know what? It’s not an ugly baby at all. In fact, it came out very pretty. I’m glad it’s here.

Several attendees have contacted me already to say they want to come next year, that they want to participate. We have support from the reliability organizations. In fact, we want this to impact our organizations, and we want to promote electrical system reliability because we never realized how much risk there was. You can see it in an article from Howard Penrose, when he talks about being at the EPRS. Electric reliability is one of the things that he’s committed to as the chairman of SMRP, and I believe that sentiment is a result, in part, of participating in the EPRS.

There was one oversight, however. One logistical thing that we need to address for next year. We had an ice cream social on the first night. An ice cream social on a hot, bright, sunny Tuesday evening in Houston, Texas. At 6 pm, we had ice cream. At 6:15 pm, we had buckets of cream. It was so hot. The ice cream melted. Fast. The idea of an ice cream social is that you get ice cream and you socialize, but it’s a little difficult to socialize with tepid cream running down your sleeve, or with a hot dish of cream soup in your hand.

Growing pains. Every baby has them.

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, The Intelligent Transformer Blog

« What are the Best Reference Books for Quality Engineers?
Turning RCA into ROI in Healthcare? – Part 3 – Unknown Benefit…Intellectual Capital »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Editor Gina Tabasso
of the The Intelligent Transformer Blog

Articles written by the folks at SDMyers

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • What is the Difference Between Quality Assurance and Quality Control?
  • Covariance of the Kaplan-Meier Estimators?
  • Use Of RFID In Process Safety: Track Hazardous Chemicals And Track Personnel
  • How to Reduce Maintenance Cost The Right Way
  • Significance Over Success. Innovation Over Change. Anticipation Over Agility

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.