Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
    • Asset Reliability @ Work
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

The Downside of a Fault Tolerant System

The Downside of a Fault Tolerant System

Maintaining high reliability or availability is a marked advantage for any system. A system that achieves the ability to avoid system downtime due to a single failure event, is essential in many applications. Yet, the fault tolerant capability comes at a price.

A system that achieves the ability to avoid system downtime due to a single failure event, is essential in many applications. Yet, the fault tolerant capability comes at a price.

Here is a short list and brief description of fault tolerant design disadvantages:

Masking or obscuring low-level failures

The nature of a fault tolerance design is to continue to operate normally even with a component failure.

Thus if the ability to detect a component failure relies on a loss of function or capability, it may be difficult to detect the failure. This sets the stage for a second component failure to cause a system downing event.

Being able to detect individual component failures permits the repair or replacement of faulty elements restoring the system to full fault tolerance capability.

Increase in testing challenges

Similar to the inability to detect some single point failures, the ability to test the functionality and parametric values of components is also limited by the nature of the fault tolerance design.

It may require additional test functionality designed into the system, further adding to the complexity of the system.

Increase in cost, weight, and complexity

Redundancy, error checking, and fault isolation designs, as examples, add components and logical elements to a system.

This increases the weight, due to the added components, board size, and power requirements. It also adds complexity by including parallel, and complex circuit and logic required to detect and ignore (functionally speaking) single point failures.

Add parts and complexity, additional cost.

Reduction in emphasis on improving component or subsystem reliability

The design team may not focus on improving the inherent reliability of elements of a fault-tolerant system. This tends to occur as the priority is on identifying single point failures and creating a design that is resilient enough to continue operation.

The focus in system availability and not necessarily on system reliability.

Increase in acceptance of inferior components

Similar to the loss of focus on inherent reliability, the team may accept the lower cost and inferior component despite the increasing frequency of component failures.

Again the focus on system availability and robustness even with component failures lose priority as the design demonstrates it’s ability to meet fault tolerant requirements.

Increase in support and maintenance expenses

The lack of focus on reliability and the increased use of inferior components causes an increase in component level failures. These failures then require replacements and repairs of the affected systems. This increases the cost of operation of the system.

Fault-tolerant design is for specific applications where the added cost, weight and complexity along with the other downsides to this approach are worth the expenses.

A good team will focus on both the system availability along with the cost of operation/maintenance and the inherent reliability of the individual elements.


Related:

Deciding What Should Have Fault Tolerance (article)

Fault Tolerance Basics (article)

Fault Tree Analysis 8 Step Process (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Reliability in Design and Development Tagged With: Fault Tolerance

« Nevada Charts to Gather Data
Using a Design FMEA »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2023 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.