Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • CMMSradio
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Asset Performance
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Hardware Product Develoment Lifecycle
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
      • FMEA Introduction
      • AIAG & VDA FMEA Methodology
    • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction
      • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Home » Articles » on Tools & Techniques » The Manufacturing Academy » Back to the Basics: Benchmarking for Improvement

by Ray Harkins Leave a Comment

Back to the Basics: Benchmarking for Improvement

Back to the Basics: Benchmarking for Improvement

Continuous improvement doesn’t happen in a vacuum. To raise the quality, reliability, and performance of their products and processes, organizations must look beyond their own four walls.
Benchmarking — the practice of studying others to improve your own performance — is a foundational tool for competitive advantage.

Whether comparing products, processes, or management systems, effective benchmarking helps organizations discover new ideas, set realistic goals, and accelerate improvement.

Let’s take a step back and explore the basics of benchmarking: what it is, how it works, and why it matters.

What Is Benchmarking?

According to Merriam-Webster, benchmarking is “to study something — such as a competitor’s product or business practice — in order to improve the performance of one’s own company.”

In simple terms, benchmarking means learning from others:

  • Studying what others do well
  • Understanding how they do it
  • Adapting that knowledge to strengthen your own operations

In quality engineering, manufacturing, and design, benchmarking offers a structured way to recognize gaps, discover best practices, and inspire innovation.

Types of Benchmarking

Benchmarking can take many forms, depending on the situation and objectives.

1. Competitive Benchmarking

This is the most recognized form of benchmarking: studying direct competitors to understand how your products, services, or processes compare.
One classic method of competitive benchmarking is the tear-down analysis — disassembling competitors’ products to study their materials, design choices, and cost-saving measures.

For example, a dishwasher manufacturer might maintain a tear-down lab stocked with competitors’ models. Engineers could analyze everything from hose quality to control panel electronics to aesthetic features, constantly learning and evaluating how their own products measure up.

Competitive benchmarking focuses on:

  • Product features and functionality
  • Material selection and costs
  • Manufacturing techniques
  • Service levels and customer experience

The goal is not merely to copy, but to understand strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities.

2. Functional Benchmarking

Benchmarking doesn’t have to involve direct competitors. Organizations can learn from non-competing companies that excel in specific activities.
For example:

  • A medical device company might study a consumer electronics company’s packaging methods.
  • A manufacturer of industrial pumps might learn inventory management techniques from a food distributor.
  • Two unrelated firms shipping to the same customers might collaborate on logistics improvements.

Functional benchmarking focuses on process excellence, not market competition. It highlights how cross-industry learning can drive operational efficiency.

3. Benchmarking Against Standards

Another form of benchmarking is measuring internal practices against external standards.
A common approach in quality management is the gap analysis, where a company compares its systems and procedures to industry-recognized standards like ISO 9001 or AS9100.

Gap analysis helps organizations:

  • Identify compliance shortfalls
  • Understand maturity levels relative to best practices
  • Prioritize improvement initiatives

Benchmarking against standards is especially important for organizations seeking certification or those working in regulated industries.

The Benchmarking Process

Effective benchmarking is structured and methodical. A typical benchmarking project involves several key steps:

  1. Identify the Focus Area
    Choose a product, process, or performance metric you want to improve. Be specific.
  2. Select Benchmark Partners
    Decide whether you will study direct competitors, non-competing companies, or standards.
  3. Collect Data
    Gather detailed information through product analysis, industry reports, site visits, customer feedback, or audits.
  4. Analyze Differences
    Understand how your performance, design, or process differs from the benchmark and why.
  5. Adapt Best Practices
    Identify feasible improvements that suit your context. Customize them intelligently rather than copying blindly.
  6. Implement and Monitor
    Put improvements into practice and track performance over time. Continuous monitoring helps sustain gains and reveals new opportunities.

Practical Example: Benchmarking in Action

Imagine a company that ships temperature-sensitive pharmaceutical products.
To improve shipping performance, they could:

  • Conduct competitive benchmarking by purchasing competitors’ shipped products and analyzing packaging integrity and temperature logs.
  • Engage in functional benchmarking by collaborating with a frozen food distributor to learn best practices in cold-chain logistics.
  • Benchmark against standards by performing a gap analysis against ISO 13485 quality management requirements.

Combining insights from all three forms of benchmarking would result in a far more robust shipping process than relying on internal experience alone.

Common Challenges in Benchmarking

While powerful, benchmarking has its pitfalls:

  • Incomplete or inaccurate data can lead to wrong conclusions.
  • Copying without adaptation often fails, as every company has different resources, goals, and cultures.
  • Narrow focus (looking only at competitors) can blind organizations to broader innovations.
  • Neglecting continuous monitoring can cause improvements to stagnate.

Successful benchmarking requires critical thinking, adaptability, and ongoing follow-up.

Final Thoughts

Benchmarking is not about imitation — it’s about learning intelligently.
By studying competitors, partners, and industry standards, professionals in quality, reliability, manufacturing, design, and laboratory fields can accelerate improvement, reduce risk, and deliver greater value to customers.

Used well, benchmarking expands an organization’s horizons: showing not just where it stands, but where it can go.

In a world of continuous improvement, benchmarking remains an essential tool for moving from good to great — and from great to exceptional.

Ray Harkins is the General Manager of Lexington Technologies in Lexington, North Carolina. He earned his Master of Science from Rochester Institute of Technology and his Master of Business Administration from Youngstown State University. He also teaches manufacturing and business-related skills such as Quality Engineering Statistics, Reliability Engineering Statistics, Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA), and Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process through the online learning platform, Udemy. He can be reached via LinkedIn at linkedin.com/in/ray-harkins or by email at the.mfg.acad@gmail.com.

Filed Under: Articles, on Tools & Techniques, The Manufacturing Academy

About Ray Harkins

Ray Harkins is a senior manufacturing professional with over 25 years of experience in manufacturing engineering, quality management, and business analysis.

During his career, he has toured hundreds of manufacturing facilities and worked with leading industry professionals throughout North America and Japan.

« Leveraging The Supply Chain Operations Reference Model
Is a Formal Criticality Analysis Necessary? »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Logo for The Manufacturing Acadamey headshot of RayArticle by Ray Harkins
in the The Manufacturing Academy article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • How to Get from Idea to Scale
  • Two Ways to Think and Talk about Reliability
  • Reliability Allocation
  • Good Project Management Leadership Will Reduce Project Risk
  • Using Condition Monitoring as a Reliability Improvement Strategy

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

Book the Course with John
  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.
This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.