
We have promoted this definition for Design of Experiments for a long time. This video provides the background of what each phrase is important. [Read more…]
Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site
by Perry Parendo Leave a Comment

We have promoted this definition for Design of Experiments for a long time. This video provides the background of what each phrase is important. [Read more…]
by James Kovacevic Leave a Comment

Imagine being able to easily share information across sites or even organizations. Â Or how about utilizing a risk management framework that is recognized and agreed upon by all in the organization. Benchmarking made easy? Â Standards enable this. [Read more…]
by Greg Hutchins Leave a Comment

General Electric (GE) for many years was the go-to company for competitiveness, efficiency, and innovation. General Electric’s tagline was ‘Imagination at work.’
GE more recently has had a number of troubles. GE’s profitability tanked. GE is selling many of its assets and divisions. GE was also taken off the Dow after 110 years. [Read more…]
by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Rotating shafts under bending stress. It is common to transmit motion using rotating shafts. The shafts are mounted in bearings and turned by force through a drive arrangement. The shafts usually also carry a load. These loads cause bending and the shaft reacts by producing counter stresses within itself. Provided the reactive stresses are within the shaft’s strength range it will take the load. But if the stresses are greater than what the shaft can take it will bend. Even if the stresses are below the load limit but fluctuate, it is possible that the shaft will break from fatigue. The point of highest stress can be found by looking at the arrangement of the shaft supports and loads and calculating the forces and stresses.
[Read more…]
by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment
I was presenting at the Aerospace Conference earlier this year, where something astounding happened. I was talking to the audience about ‘organizational culture’ and my experiences working with a small satellite manufacturer to help them improve their product’s reliability.
At the end of my talk, I was asked the following questions (which I have done my best to remember verbatim):
How do you accommodate the young engineers of today, who will only stay at one organization for a couple of years before moving on? Research has shown they typically leave within three years – so why should we invest time and effort into them?
If you are a team leader or manager that is searching for the answer to this question, I have some potentially bad news for you:
It is not them … it is you. [Read more…]
by Adam Bahret Leave a Comment

I just returned from a great conference in Stuttgart called “Reliability Days.” I presented on some new concepts and techniques with regard to assessing and improving reliability culture in the product development process. Enjoy the presentation.
-Adam
by Perry Parendo Leave a Comment

When testing, it is good to know your options. The Advanced tools of Design of Experiments are good to consider. What are they, why should you consider them, and when should they be used. Those are the topics we will discuss in this video. [Read more…]
by Doug Plucknette Leave a Comment

One of the best things about my job is from time to time I get to work with some fantastic young people who have a passion for the Maintenance and Reliability business and have made the decision to pursue a career in this business. I really enjoy being a mentor, guiding the ambitious and offering advice on where to find information, articles and real, workable solutions. [Read more…]
by James Kovacevic Leave a Comment

Imagine if every day you had to relearn a process or use a different CMMS. Â Chances are you would get virtually nothing accomplished, leaving your plant operating poorly. Â Now we all know that we having to relearn a process every day or using a new CMMS is not practical nor is it rooted in reality (not to be confused with the Rooted in Reliability podcast). Â But this type of thing happens more often than you may think. [Read more…]
by Greg Hutchins Leave a Comment

This story is about risk at the enterprise program/project level.  It is an example of centering your design around a high-tech solution to a problem when a low risk proven technology would have more than sufficed.  Technical expertise ego got in the way of a practical low-cost approach resulting in unplanned schedule and cost growth. [Read more…]
by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Orifice plate meter flow measurement. An orifice meter is a circular piece of metal plate placed between flanges in a pipe. In it is a square-edged round hole machined 0.5 to 0.8 pipe diameter in size. Pressure tapping points are placed either side of the plate at specified distances. The orifice causes a flow restriction and produces a pressure drop from one side of the hole to the other. The amount of pressure difference is proportional to the flow of fluid through the hole. The flow is calculated from the pressure difference and flow areas using accurate mathematical formulas. [Read more…]
by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment

I was recently talking with my colleague Fred Schenkelberg from FMS Reliability (this conversation can be heard here), about a plane that he had never heard of. Most of the world hasn’t heard of it. And there is a reason you probably haven’t either. The plane in question is a case study on how to design something to fail.
by Perry Parendo Leave a Comment

How do you know if YOU need robustness? It is a combination of testing and analysis. Can you afford it? How do you decide? This video helps set the stage for this decision. [Read more…]
by James Kovacevic Leave a Comment

I recently had a very interesting  discussion with a craftsman at a large automotive manufacturer.  During this discussion, he outlined a few of the issues he saw in his plant, and why they weren’t able to overcome them.
The craftsman indicated that he had been reading my previous posts and that it all made sense. Â In fact, he stated, ” it is common sense, but we don’t have that here”.

Using IOT Intelligent Things to Monitor Risk in Real-time
Although in ISO 31000 monitoring risk is another of its key tenets, I again see little monitoring in most risk management systems. Periodic review, dashboards, heat maps, and KRI reports are all Review (a different ISO 31000 tenet) not monitoring. IoT technology can deliver real-time monitoring of risk for more than just physical environmental metrics.
To monitor means to supervise and continually check and critically observe. It means to determine the current status and to assess whether or not the required or expected performance levels are actually being achieved. [Read more…]
Ask a question or send along a comment.
Please login to view and use the contact form.